Ieee transactions on power electronics
Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. | 覆盖主流期刊的 Claude Code/Codex 期刊技能包,从选题、识别策略到表格规范与审稿回复全流程,助你快速发论文。
npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ieee-transactions-on-power-electronicsAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Use when targeting IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics (TPEL) or deciding whether a power-conversion manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, the hardware-validation bar, the converter-and-control scope, the TPEL-vs-TIE routing, house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.
SKILL.md
7.3 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics (ieee-transactions-on-power-electronics)
Journal positioning
IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics (TPEL) is the leading archival venue for power conversion: converter and inverter topologies, motor drives, control of power-electronic systems, magnetics and passive components, wide-bandgap devices in circuits, and power-electronics-enabled energy systems. The defining expectation is a concrete power-conversion advance backed by experimental validation — a topology, modulation, or control method whose benefit (efficiency, power density, reliability, dynamic response) is demonstrated on hardware, not only in simulation. Simulation-only proposals and minor topology permutations without measured benefit are a weak fit. This skill is a fit / venue-selection / re-framing tool. It does not replace the journal's current official author guidelines. Before submitting, re-check the live IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics author information and submission system.
When to trigger
- The author names TPEL for a converter, inverter, drive, or power-electronic-control manuscript and wants a fit/framing check.
- A design must be re-framed from "we built a converter" into a generalizable power-conversion contribution with measured, benchmarked benefit.
- The author is choosing between TPEL and
ieee-transactions-on-industrial-electronics(broader industrial electronics) or an energy-systems venue. - The author needs the hardware-validation bar and desk-reject heuristics specific to power electronics.
Scope & topic fit
- Converter and inverter topologies: DC-DC, DC-AC, AC-DC, multilevel, resonant, and soft-switching converters with a clear conversion advantage.
- Modulation and control of power-electronic systems: current/voltage control, model predictive control, stability of grid-tied and standalone converters.
- Motor drives and electric-machine control from the power-electronics side: drive topologies, modulation, and torque/efficiency performance.
- Wide-bandgap (SiC/GaN) device application in converters, gate drives, packaging, and thermal management with measured impact.
- Magnetics, passive components, EMI, and reliability of power-electronic converters; power-electronics interfaces for renewables, storage, and transportation.
Method & evidence bar
- The contribution is a power-conversion method with experimental validation — a hardware prototype with measured efficiency, power density, thermal, dynamic, or reliability results, typically expected at this venue.
- Simulation establishes design and operating principles but generally does not substitute for measurement; the absence of any hardware result is a common weakness.
- Efficiency and performance must be benchmarked against the relevant state-of-the-art topology/control under comparable conditions, with operating points and loss breakdowns reported.
- Claims (e.g., higher efficiency, lower EMI, better dynamics) must be supported by instrumented measurements with stated test conditions, component ratings, and control parameters.
- The contribution must generalize beyond one built unit: the design principle, trade-offs, and applicable operating range should be made explicit.
Structure & house style
- IEEE format; TPEL publishes full Papers and shorter Letters — match scope to the article type and re-check current definitions and limits on the live guide.
- The introduction motivates the conversion problem and positions against prior topologies/control; the analysis derives the operating principle before the experiment validates it.
- Figures are central and quantitative: schematics, modulation/control diagrams, measured waveforms, efficiency/loss curves, thermal images, and prototype photos.
- Hardware specifications (devices, magnetics, switching frequency, power level) must be reported in enough detail to reproduce the result.
Official-submission checklist
- Before giving submission-ready advice, read
../../resources/source-basis.mdand../../resources/official-source-map.md; start from the IEEE Author Center anchors, then cite the current Transactions on Power Electronics page you checked. - Search the live site for "IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics information for authors" and follow the current submission-system version.
- Re-check article types (Paper vs. Letter), length/overlength policy, and the IEEE template.
- Confirm expectations for experimental validation, measured-data reporting, and any reproducibility requirements.
- Re-check ORCID, competing-interests, funding, author-contribution, and AI-use disclosure requirements, and IEEE open-access options.
- If the live official instructions conflict with this skill, the official instructions win.
Pre-submission self-check
- The contribution is a generalizable power-conversion advance, not a one-off build or a minor topology permutation.
- A hardware prototype provides measured efficiency/dynamic/thermal/reliability results, not simulation only.
- Performance is benchmarked against the relevant state-of-the-art topology/control under comparable conditions.
- Loss breakdowns, operating points, and test conditions are reported.
- Component ratings, switching frequency, and control parameters are detailed enough to reproduce.
- Article type (Paper vs. Letter) and length fit current limits.
Common desk-reject triggers
- Simulation-only converter/control proposal with no experimental validation.
- A minor topology permutation with no measured efficiency/performance benefit over existing designs.
- Efficiency claims with no loss breakdown, no benchmark, or under non-comparable test conditions.
- Results from a single built unit with no generalizable design principle or trade-off analysis.
- Application/integration paper where power electronics is incidental and no converter-level advance is shown.
Re-routing decision
- Broader industrial-electronics, drives, or industrial-systems emphasis →
ieee-transactions-on-industrial-electronics. - Grid/system-level integration rather than the converter →
ieee-transactions-on-power-systems. - Energy-system performance is the primary narrative →
applied-energy. - Battery/storage-cell or device materials focus →
journal-of-power-sources/energy-storage-materials. - Broad tutorial/survey of a power-electronics area →
proceedings-of-the-ieee.
Output format
[Fit] High / Medium / Low (one-line reason)
[Target] IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics
[Topic tags] <2–3 closest power-electronics subtopics>
[Conversion advance] <the topology/control idea and the metric it improves>
[Hardware validation] <prototype + measured results present? benchmarked?>
[Top risk] <the single most likely reason for rejection>
[Article type] Paper / Letter
[Official items to re-check] <article type / length / experimental-validation / disclosures>
[Re-route suggestion] <if not a fit, a better-matched venue>