International journal of plasticity
Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. | 覆盖主流期刊的 Claude Code/Codex 期刊技能包,从选题、识别策略到表格规范与审稿回复全流程,助你快速发论文。
npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill international-journal-of-plasticityAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Use when targeting the International Journal of Plasticity (IJP) or deciding whether a plastic-deformation modeling manuscript fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit, the constitutive-model-plus-experimental-validation bar, the plasticity-centric scope, the IJP-vs-JMPS routing, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.
SKILL.md
7.8 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
International Journal of Plasticity (international-journal-of-plasticity)
Journal positioning
The International Journal of Plasticity (IJP) is a leading archival journal focused specifically on the theory and modeling of plastic deformation of solids: rate-dependent and rate-independent constitutive models, crystal plasticity, finite-deformation plasticity, and the coupling of plasticity with damage, fracture, and phase transformation. Unlike a broad solid-mechanics journal, IJP is plasticity-centric — its center of gravity is a new or improved constitutive description of inelastic behavior, formulated rigorously and validated against experiment. Papers that report a deformation observation with no constitutive contribution, or that apply an off-the-shelf plasticity model to one part with no modeling advance, are a weak fit. This skill is a fit / venue-selection / re-framing tool. It does not replace the journal's current official author guidelines. Before submitting, re-check the live IJP Guide for Authors.
When to trigger
- The author names IJP for a plasticity, crystal-plasticity, or inelastic-behavior manuscript and wants a fit/framing check.
- A paper must be re-framed from "we observed plastic deformation" into a constitutive-model contribution validated against data.
- The author is choosing between IJP (plasticity-centric, constitutive focus) and a
broader fundamental-mechanics venue (
journal-of-the-mechanics-and-physics-of-solids). - The author needs IJP's constitutive-model rigor bar and desk-reject heuristics.
Scope & topic fit
- Phenomenological constitutive models of plasticity/viscoplasticity: rate-dependent and rate-independent flow rules, hardening laws, yield-surface evolution, anisotropy.
- Crystal plasticity: single-crystal and polycrystal models, slip/twinning kinematics, texture evolution, and grain-scale-to-macroscale linking.
- Finite-deformation and large-strain plasticity: kinematic decompositions, objective formulations, and their numerical implementation.
- Coupled plasticity: plasticity coupled with damage, ductile fracture, phase transformation, recrystallization, or thermomechanical effects.
- Gradient, size-dependent, and dislocation-based plasticity capturing length-scale effects with a constitutive contribution.
- Plasticity of advanced materials (high-entropy alloys, TWIP/TRIP steels, polymers, metallic glasses) when the advance is the constitutive model, not just the material.
Method & evidence bar
- The central object is a constitutive model of inelastic behavior — clearly formulated, thermodynamically and kinematically consistent, and physically motivated.
- Models must be validated against experimental data across more than one loading path or condition; fitting a single curve is not validation.
- Calibration and identification of parameters must be transparent: state the data, the procedure, and the predictive (not merely fitted) evidence.
- Numerical implementation, when central, must be verified (e.g., convergence, objectivity, consistency of the tangent) and clearly described.
- Position against the closest existing plasticity models: what behavior, coupling, or class of materials does the new model capture that prior ones do not.
- Reproducibility: report model equations, parameter values, loading protocols, and material/microstructure details sufficient to reproduce the predictions.
Structure & house style
- Standard full-length research-article structure; IJP publishes archival modeling papers — re-check article types on the live guide.
- The introduction motivates the constitutive gap (what inelastic behavior is not captured); the body develops the model, its identification, and its validation.
- Equations are central and must be self-consistent; use standard finite-deformation plasticity notation and define all internal variables.
- Figures carry the validation: model-vs-experiment overlays across loading paths, yield-surface/texture evolution, and parameter-sensitivity plots.
- Implementation details, derivations, and extended calibration go to appendices/supplementary material; the main text must establish the model and its predictive validity unaided.
Official-submission checklist
- Before giving submission-ready advice, read
../../resources/source-basis.mdand../../resources/official-source-map.md; start from the Elsevier anchors, then cite the current IJP Guide for Authors page you checked. - Search the live site for "International Journal of Plasticity guide for authors" and follow the current Elsevier/Editorial Manager version.
- Re-check article types, length/figure expectations, and the data- and code-availability policy (model parameters, implementation, raw test data).
- Confirm equation/notation formatting and any highlights or graphical-abstract requirement.
- Re-check competing-interests, funding, author-contribution (CRediT), and AI-use disclosure requirements.
- If the live official instructions conflict with this skill, the official instructions win.
Pre-submission self-check
- The contribution is a constitutive model of inelastic behavior, not a deformation observation or an off-the-shelf application.
- The formulation is thermodynamically and kinematically consistent with explicit internal variables.
- The model is validated against experiment across multiple loading paths/conditions, not a single fitted curve.
- Parameter identification is transparent and the predictive (not just fitted) evidence is shown.
- Novelty is pinned to specific prior plasticity models (new coupling / behavior / material class).
- The article type and length fit IJP's archival modeling format.
Common desk-reject triggers
- Applying an existing plasticity model to one component with no constitutive advance.
- A new model fitted to a single test curve and presented as validated.
- Experiment-only deformation study with no constitutive modeling contribution.
- Constitutive equations proposed without thermodynamic/kinematic consistency or numerical verification.
- Scope mismatch: a broad solid-mechanics, materials-processing, or pure structural-FE paper with plasticity only as a label.
- Better framed as fundamental (non-plasticity) mechanics or a materials/microstructure study.
Re-routing decision
- Broad fundamental solid mechanics (fracture, instabilities, soft matter) →
journal-of-the-mechanics-and-physics-of-solids. - Microstructure-first plasticity mechanism (processing–structure–property) →
acta-materialia. - Plasticity in composites or composite-structure inelasticity →
composites-part-b-engineering. - Forming/machining process mechanics where plasticity is the manufacturing tool →
international-journal-of-machine-tools-and-manufacture. - Highest-impact conceptual mechanics-of-materials advance for a broad audience →
nature-materials.
Output format
[Fit] High / Medium / Low (one-line reason)
[Target] International Journal of Plasticity
[Topic tags] <2–3 closest plasticity subtopics>
[Constitutive contribution] <the new model / coupling / behavior in one line>
[Method/evidence] <does the model clear IJP's formulation + multi-path validation bar?>
[Top risk] <the single most likely reason for rejection>
[Official items to re-check] <article type / length / data-code / abstract / disclosures>
[Re-route suggestion] <if not a fit, a better-matched venue>