agentsclimarketplace

Demog workflow

Skill brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/Demography-Skills/skills/demog-workflow

Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. | 覆盖主流期刊的 Claude Code/Codex 期刊技能包,从选题、识别策略到表格规范与审稿回复全流程,助你快速发论文。

Install
npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill demog-workflow

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

What its author says it does

Copied from the file, not written here

Use as the entry point for any Demography (PAA / Duke University Press) manuscript. Routes to the right Demography sub-skill based on where you are in the lifecycle and which article type (Research Article, Research Note, Commentary) fits. It dispatches; it does not draft content.

SKILL.md

4.8 KB, ~1.0k tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it

Demography Workflow Router (demog-workflow)

The orchestrator for a Demography submission. Figure out the stage and the article type, then send the user to the matching skill. Demography is the multidisciplinary flagship of the Population Association of America — the router's first job is to confirm the paper poses a genuine population-science question (how populations change, or why, and with what consequences), not a study that merely uses demographic data in passing.

When to trigger

  • Starting a new Demography paper and unsure where to begin
  • Mid-project and unsure which skill applies next
  • Deciding which article type fits (Article vs. Note vs. Commentary)
  • Returning with a decision letter (route to demog-rebuttal)

First question: which article type?

SituationTypeRoute to
Full original population studyResearch Article (<= 8,000 words)normal pipeline below
One focused, self-contained contributionResearch Note (<= 4,000 words)normal pipeline, tighter scope
Short response/perspective on published work or a debateCommentary (<= 2,000 words)demog-literature-positioning + demog-writing-style

Word caps are main-text counts (exclude abstract, keywords, footnotes, acknowledgments). Confirm current caps on the official page (see 待核实).

Routing map (stage -> skill)

Idea / fit?                       -> demog-topic-selection
Where does it sit in the field?   -> demog-literature-positioning
What's the argument/mechanism?    -> demog-theory-building
Is the demographic design sound?  -> demog-research-design
Are the analyses sound?           -> demog-data-analysis
Are the exhibits clear?           -> demog-tables-figures
Does it read for population sci.? -> demog-writing-style
Data statement & repro package?   -> demog-data-and-reproducibility
How will it be judged?            -> demog-review-process
Ready to submit (ScholarOne)?     -> demog-submission
Got an R&R / decision?            -> demog-rebuttal

Default order

topic-selection -> literature-positioning -> theory-building -> research-design -> data-analysis -> tables-figures -> writing-style -> data-and-reproducibility -> review-process -> submission -> rebuttal

Iterate: most demographic papers loop theory <-> design <-> analysis several times (e.g., choosing among life-table, decomposition, event-history, or APC framings) before writing-style.

Anti-patterns

  • Treating Demography like a generic applied-stats venue — the question must be about population change
  • Forcing one demographic method (e.g., a regression) when the question calls for a life table, a decomposition, or an event-history model
  • Calling the $1,000 editorial-management fee an open-access charge (Demography is free to read via S2O)
  • Leaving the data availability statement until acceptance — build it as you go

Router pass for Demography

Run this as a concrete capability pass. First lock the demographic process, data source, time scale, selection/migration/mortality issue, and uncertainty; then test whether the manuscript addresses population-science reviewers who inspect demographic process, measurement, cohort/period logic, and population validity.

  • Primary move: Run the pack as fit gate, evidence gate, writing gate, source-map gate, and output contract; stop when a gate lacks evidence.
  • Decision ledger: return claim / evidence / blocker / next edit rows so the next pass can patch the manuscript directly.
  • Sibling comparison: compare against Population and Development Review for policy synthesis, JMF for family process, Social Forces for broader sociology; if the neighboring outlet has the stronger audience claim, recommend re-routing before polishing.
  • Verification floor: before submission-ready advice, re-open resources/official-source-map.md for volatile rules and name the one unresolved fact that could change the recommendation.

Output format

【Stage】idea / positioning / theory / design / analysis / exhibits / writing / data / review / submit / rebut
【Type】Research Article / Research Note / Commentary
【Route to】demog-<skill>
【Why】one line
【Then】the next skill after that

Supplementary resources

What ships with it

Read from the repository

Just SKILL.md. No reference files, no scripts.

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 328,083. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.