agentsclimarketplace

Dac workflow

Skill brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/DAC-Skills/skills/dac-workflow

Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. | 覆盖主流期刊的 Claude Code/Codex 期刊技能包,从选题、识别策略到表格规范与审稿回复全流程,助你快速发论文。

Install
npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill dac-workflow

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

What its author says it does

Copied from the file, not written here

Use to plan a full ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference (DAC) Research-Manuscript campaign backward from the mid-to-late-November manuscript deadline through the two-stage abstract-then-manuscript submission on Softconf, the winter review, the March notification, the April camera-ready and copyright for the ACM Digital Library, and the July conference in Long Beach — with the Engineering-Track and Late-Breaking-Results side calendars.

SKILL.md

5.4 KB, ~1.3k tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it

DAC Workflow

Run the DAC year backward from the deadline. DAC's Research-Manuscript cycle is a single annual deadline in mid-to-late November (DAC 2026: manuscript ~19 November 2025) leading to a July conference (DAC 2026: Long Beach, California, 26-29 July 2026). Unlike the two-cycle software venues, DAC gives you one archival shot per year, so the calendar is unforgiving. Every date below is a DAC 2026 snapshot read on 2026-07-09; reopen the live event pages first (resources/official-source-map.md).

The two-stage submission (do not miss stage one)

DAC splits the research submission into two stages on the Softconf/START system (dac26):

  • Stage 1 — Abstract. Register title, full abstract, and all co-authors roughly a week before the manuscript deadline. This stage seeds reviewer assignment and conflict detection; if you skip it, the system will not accept your PDF later.
  • Stage 2 — Manuscript. Upload the anonymized 6+1-page PDF by the manuscript deadline. There is no grace period to fix a malformed or non-anonymous PDF after the cutoff.

Register with the real title and abstract, not a placeholder — the abstract drives which TPC members bid on and are assigned to your paper.

The DAC 2026 research calendar (snapshot — verify each cycle)

[~Nov 12, 2025]  Abstract stage closes (title/abstract/co-authors on Softconf)   待核实 exact day
[Nov 19, 2025]   Research Manuscript deadline (final anonymized 6+1 PDF)          待核实 exact day
[Nov 2025-Feb]   Double-blind TPC review + program-committee discussion
[Feb 23, 2026]   Accepted research-manuscript IDs published
[Mar 9, 2026]    Accept / reject notifications
[Mar 23, 2026]   Acceptance confirmation forms due
[Apr 14, 2026]   Copyright form + final (proceedings) manuscript due — ACM DL camera-ready
[Jul 26-29, 2026] DAC 2026, Long Beach Convention Center — presentation + exhibition

Whether DAC 2026 runs an author rebuttal / response period between review and notification is 待核实 — DAC's research review has historically been TPC-driven without the ISCA/MICRO-style author response. Do not plan a rebuttal window into your calendar until the live cycle confirms one.

Side calendars (different deadlines — do not conflate)

  • Engineering Track: separate call, separate committee, later Call-for-Contributions deadline (DAC 2026 extended to ~20 January 2026). Presentation-oriented; see dac-topic-selection.
  • Late Breaking Results (LBR): short poster-style track on softconf.com/dac26/lbr26, deadline in early 2026 (extended in past cycles into ~March). Good for a timely, early result that is not yet an archival Research Manuscript.
  • Special Sessions / Panels / Tutorials / Workshops: proposal-based, their own timelines.

Backward plan from the November manuscript deadline

[Deadline − 12 wk]  Lock the contribution and the QoR claim; pick benchmark suites (ISPD/EPFL/
                    ISCAS/ITC/TAU/CircuitNet) and the baselines you must beat
[Deadline − 8 wk]   Freeze the experimental harness; start the runs that take longest (full-flow
                    P&R, large-benchmark sweeps) — these cannot be compressed at the end
[Deadline − 4 wk]   Full draft in the ACM double-column template; check the 6-page body budget early
[Deadline − 2 wk]   Internal review; tighten to 6+1; build every figure at column width and legible
[Deadline − 1 wk]   Complete the abstract stage on Softconf with the real title/abstract/co-authors
[Deadline − 3 day]  Double-blind sweep on the PDF; re-run the headline numbers on a clean checkout
[Deadline − 1 day]  Upload; re-download and read the PDF cold; confirm it is the intended file

Between notification and camera-ready

  • Accept: de-anonymize, apply the ACM template's final-version rules, complete metadata and the copyright form, and hit the April proceedings deadline for the ACM Digital Library archival version (dac-camera-ready).
  • Reject: DAC has no formal appeal; reroute promptly — ICCAD (fall), DATE (Europe), ASP-DAC (January), or a journal (TCAD/TODAES) — using dac-topic-selection.

Standing reminders

  • One archival deadline a year: a missed November means a full year, so calendar the abstract stage, not just the manuscript stage.
  • The 6-page body budget is tight; plan the paper's argument to fit six double-column pages rather than writing long and cutting.
  • Track choice (Research vs Engineering) is a workflow decision made before the deadline, not a fallback after rejection.

Output format

[Cycle target]     DAC 20XX research manuscript / engineering track / LBR
[Abstract stage]   locked by the earlier cutoff? yes/no
[Manuscript stage] on track for the November deadline? blockers?
[Longest runs]     which experiments gate the deadline; started? yes/no
[Post-decision]    camera-ready plan (ACM DL, April) or reroute target (ICCAD/DATE/ASP-DAC)

What ships with it

Read from the repository

Just SKILL.md. No reference files, no scripts.

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 328,083. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.