agentsclimarketplace

Car theory development

Skill brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/Contemporary-Accounting-Research-Skills/skills/car-theory-development

Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. | 覆盖主流期刊的 Claude Code/Codex 期刊技能包,从选题、识别策略到表格规范与审稿回复全流程,助你快速发论文。

Install
npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill car-theory-development

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

What its author says it does

Copied from the file, not written here

Use when building the conceptual engine of a Contemporary Accounting Research (CAR) manuscript — the economic or behavioral mechanism, predictions/hypotheses, or the formal model — adapted to whether the paper is archival, experimental, analytical, or qualitative. Builds the argument; it does not run estimation (car-data-analysis) or frame the contribution (car-contribution-framing).

SKILL.md

4.9 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it

Theory & Prediction Development (car-theory-development)

When to trigger

  • Predictions are descriptive ("X is associated with Y") with no mechanism
  • An analytical paper has equations but no clear economic intuition
  • An experiment lacks a theory that pins down the predicted direction and the process
  • A reviewer says "this is atheoretical" or "the predictions don't follow from the framework"

CAR develops theory differently by tradition

Because CAR is method-agnostic, "theory development" means different things across its traditions, and a reader should never be able to swap in a generic management-theory template:

  • Archival / capital-markets. Ground predictions in economics-based frameworks (information asymmetry and disclosure, agency and contracting, market efficiency and the properties of accounting numbers). Derive directional, falsifiable predictions and, critically, predict cross-sectional variation — the moderators that make the effect stronger or weaker are where the theoretical content lives. State the maintained assumptions linking the accounting construct to the market outcome.
  • Experimental. Specify the psychological/economic process (e.g., motivated reasoning, mental accounting, ambiguity, incentives) that produces the effect, then design predictions that isolate that process — including a predicted mediator and the conditions under which the effect reverses or vanishes. Theory must justify the manipulation, not just the dependent variable.
  • Analytical / modeling. The model is the theory. State the setting, players, information structure, timing, and equilibrium concept; derive results as propositions with proofs; and translate each comparative static into an empirical or institutional implication. The contribution is the economic insight, not the algebra.
  • Field / qualitative. Build theory inductively from the data; make the abductive logic from observations to constructs explicit and traceable.

Predictions and hypotheses

  • Write each prediction so the data could falsify it; state sign and, where possible, relative magnitude.
  • For mediation/process claims, theorize the mechanism before testing it.
  • Distinguish the maintained assumptions (untested) from the tested predictions.

Checklist

  • The mechanism is named and its logic is explicit, not assumed
  • Predictions are directional and falsifiable; cross-sectional/conditional predictions stated
  • (Analytical) assumptions, equilibrium concept, and the intuition behind each result are stated
  • (Experimental) the predicted process/mediator and reversal conditions are specified
  • Predictions map cleanly to constructs the chosen method can measure or manipulate

Anti-patterns

  • Association dressed as theory: "we expect X relates to Y" with no why.
  • Algebra without intuition (analytical) or DV-only theory (experimental) that ignores the process.
  • Borrowed-template theory that ignores accounting's information/contracting context.

Operating pass for Contemporary Accounting Research

Use this as a second-pass capability check. First lock the accounting construct, setting, identification or theory, and disclosure/market/organizational implication; then test whether the manuscript addresses accounting reviewers who expect accounting-specific constructs, credible design, and contribution to reporting, auditing, tax, or governance debates.

  • Primary move: Return a claim-evidence-risk ledger; every recommendation must point to a manuscript location or missing artifact.
  • Decision ledger: return claim / evidence / blocker / next edit rows so the next pass can patch the manuscript directly.
  • Neighbor test: compare against The Accounting Review for US flagship breadth, JAR for Chicago-style accounting research, JAE for economics/accounting interface; if the neighboring outlet has the stronger audience claim, recommend re-routing before polishing.
  • Verification floor: before submission-ready advice, re-open resources/official-source-map.md for volatile rules and name the one unresolved fact that could change the recommendation.

Output format

【Tradition】archival / experimental / analytical / qualitative
【Mechanism】the economic/behavioral logic ...
【Predictions/Hypotheses】H1..Hn, signs, conditional/cross-sectional ...
【Assumptions】maintained vs. tested (or model primitives) ...
【Process】predicted mediator / equilibrium intuition ...
【Next step】car-literature-positioning or car-methods

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 328,083. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.