Cps workflow
Skill brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/Comparative-Political-Studies-Skills/skills/cps-workflow
Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. | 覆盖主流期刊的 Claude Code/Codex 期刊技能包,从选题、识别策略到表格规范与审稿回复全流程,助你快速发论文。
npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill cps-workflowAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Use when starting or navigating any Comparative Political Studies (CPS) manuscript and you need the right next sub-skill, chosen by lifecycle stage and whether the paper makes a genuinely comparative claim across countries or over time. It dispatches; it does not draft content.
SKILL.md
4.8 KB, 993 tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it
CPS Workflow Router (cps-workflow)
The orchestrator for a Comparative Political Studies submission. Figure out the stage, then send the user to the matching skill. CPS is the discipline's comparative-politics specialist (SAGE, since 1968) — the router's first job is to confirm the paper makes a comparative argument (across countries, subnational units, or over time), not a single-case study with no comparative leverage.
When to trigger
- Starting a new CPS paper and unsure where to begin
- Mid-project and unsure which skill applies next
- Unsure whether the paper is comparative enough for CPS (vs. a single-country area-studies piece)
- Returning with a decision letter (route to
cps-rebuttal)
First question: is it comparative?
| Situation | CPS fit | Route to |
|---|---|---|
| Cross-national or cross-regional claim | Strong | normal pipeline below |
| Subnational comparison or over-time within one country | Strong (intra-national counts) | normal pipeline |
| Single case used to build/test a portable theory | Conditional — must travel | cps-topic-selection + cps-theory-building |
| Single country, descriptive, no comparative leverage | Weak — likely off-fit | cps-topic-selection (reframe) |
| General US poli-sci or pure IR theory | Off-fit — see sibling guard | reconsider venue |
CPS publishes work on democratization & regimes, institutions, political behavior & participation, ethnic politics & conflict, comparative political economy, and parties & elections — comparative in design or in the portability of the claim.
Routing map (stage → skill)
Idea / comparative fit? → cps-topic-selection
Where does it sit in the field? → cps-literature-positioning
What's the argument? → cps-theory-building
Is the design defensible? → cps-research-design
Are the analyses sound? → cps-data-analysis
Are the exhibits clear? → cps-tables-figures
Does it read for comparativists? → cps-writing-style
Replication & transparency? → cps-transparency-and-data
How will it be judged? → cps-review-process
Ready to submit? → cps-submission
Got an R&R / decision? → cps-rebuttal
Default order
topic-selection → literature-positioning → theory-building → research-design → data-analysis → tables-figures → writing-style → transparency-and-data → review-process → submission → rebuttal
Iterate: most papers loop theory ↔ design ↔ analysis several times before writing-style.
Comparative-fit routing check
Before selecting the next skill, force a one-minute CPS fit check:
| Check | Pass condition | Route if weak |
|---|---|---|
| Comparative leverage | The variation that identifies the claim is across cases or time, not within one snapshot. | cps-research-design |
| Travel | The argument is stated as a portable mechanism a comparativist of another region can import. | cps-theory-building |
| Generality | The contribution speaks to a comparative-politics debate, not only to one country's specialists. | cps-topic-selection |
| Transparency | Quantitative results have a CPS Dataverse plan; qualitative evidence has a documentation plan. | cps-transparency-and-data |
If the paper fails the comparative-leverage check, do not route to writing-style — it needs a design or fit repair, because CPS reviewers reject well-executed single-case papers that never become comparative.
Anti-patterns
- Treating CPS like an area-studies outlet — a lone country case with no comparative leverage is off-fit
- Pitching to the whole discipline like APSR/AJPS — CPS wants the comparative-politics contribution
- Submitting a pure-IR or pure-formal-theory paper that never compares political systems
- Deferring the replication package to acceptance — quantitative papers cannot be finally accepted without it
Output format
【Stage】idea / positioning / theory / design / analysis / exhibits / writing / transparency / review / submit / rebut
【Comparative?】cross-national / subnational / over-time / single-case-that-travels / not-yet
【Route to】cps-<skill>
【Why】one line
【Then】the next skill after that
Supplementary resources
../../resources/external_tools.md— comparative-politics data + software by method../../resources/official-source-map.md— official CPS / SAGE URLs behind every fact in this pack
What ships with it
Read from the repository
Just SKILL.md. No reference files, no scripts.