agentsclimarketplace

Journal of the american society of nephrology

Skill brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/Clinical-Medicine-Journal-Skills/skills/journal-of-the-american-society-of-nephrology

Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. | 覆盖主流期刊的 Claude Code/Codex 期刊技能包,从选题、识别策略到表格规范与审稿回复全流程,助你快速发论文。

Install
npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill journal-of-the-american-society-of-nephrology

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

What its author says it does

Copied from the file, not written here

Use when targeting the Journal of the American Society of Nephrology or deciding whether a nephrology clinical, translational, or basic study fits this venue. Encodes the journal's fit across kidney disease, dialysis, transplantation, and renal physiology, the mechanistic and evidence bar, reporting-guideline and registration requirements, ASN house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics. Venue-fit aid only, not clinical advice.

SKILL.md

7.7 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it

Journal of the American Society of Nephrology (journal-of-the-american-society-of-nephrology)

Journal positioning

The Journal of the American Society of Nephrology (JASN) is the American Society of Nephrology flagship, publishing high-impact nephrology research across the full evidence spectrum: clinical trials and cohorts in kidney disease, dialysis, and transplantation; translational kidney biomarker and -omics work; and basic renal physiology, cell biology, and disease-mechanism science. Its defining expectation is a mechanistically or clinically significant advance in kidney health and disease, with an emphasis on discovery and disease mechanism alongside rigorous clinical work — not a small single-center series or a descriptive registry slice. With its U.S. society base, JASN often anchors strongly in mechanism, novel biology, and trials that move nephrology practice. This skill is a fit / venue-selection / re-framing aid; it is not clinical or regulatory advice and does not replace the journal's current instructions for authors. Before submitting, re-check the live JASN author instructions.

When to trigger

  • The author names JASN for a nephrology clinical, translational, or basic-science study and wants a fit/framing check.
  • A kidney study must be re-framed around a disease mechanism or a practice-changing nephrology question rather than a descriptive report.
  • The author is choosing between JASN and Kidney International (ISN flagship), or between JASN and general medicine.
  • The author needs the journal's reporting-guideline, registration, and basic/animal-study expectations for kidney research.

Scope & topic fit

  • Chronic and acute kidney disease: CKD progression, AKI, glomerular and tubulointerstitial disease, and diabetic and hypertensive kidney disease.
  • Dialysis and renal replacement: hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis, and outcomes/access research.
  • Kidney transplantation: immunology, rejection, allograft outcomes, and organ-preservation science.
  • Renal physiology and cell biology: tubular transport, podocyte and glomerular biology, fibrosis, and electrolyte/acid-base mechanism.
  • Translational nephrology: kidney biomarkers, genetics/genomics, single-cell and -omics atlases with disease relevance.
  • Clinical trials and large cohorts with kidney endpoints (eGFR/kidney failure, mortality, cardiovascular outcomes in CKD).

Method & evidence bar

  • Clinical studies must be adequately powered with prespecified, patient-centered kidney endpoints; trials require prospective registration and the registration number.
  • The applicable reporting guideline and checklist are expected: CONSORT for trials, STROBE for observational work, PRISMA for systematic reviews, ARRIVE for animal studies.
  • Basic/translational work needs rigorous controls, biological replication, validated reagents/models, and blinded/randomized animal experiments where applicable.
  • Mechanistic claims require perturbation evidence in cells or animals plus anchoring to human kidney tissue, biofluids, or cohorts where feasible.
  • Effect estimates need confidence intervals and absolute as well as relative measures; causal language must match the design and model.
  • eGFR/biomarker methods, kidney-outcome definitions, and statistical-analysis plans must be explicit.

Structure & house style

  • ASN format with a structured abstract and a significance/visual-abstract statement; re-check current article types (Original Article, Basic Research, Clinical Research, etc.) and limits on the live guide.
  • The introduction frames the kidney-biology or clinical gap; the discussion states the mechanistic insight or practice implication and bounds overreach.
  • A CONSORT/STROBE/PRISMA flow diagram is expected for the relevant clinical design; animal work reports ARRIVE-aligned detail.
  • Figures show representative data with statistics, N, and replication; a supplement carries full methods, the protocol/SAP, and additional experiments.

Official-submission checklist

  • Before giving submission-ready advice, read ../../resources/source-basis.md and ../../resources/official-source-map.md; start from the ICMJE/EQUATOR and ASN anchors, then cite the current JASN page you checked.
  • Search the live site for "JASN American Society of Nephrology instructions for authors" and follow the current version.
  • Re-check article types, abstract and significance-statement format, and word/figure/reference limits.
  • Confirm trial registration, the reporting checklist (CONSORT/STROBE/PRISMA/ARRIVE), data/code-availability, and protocol/SAP submission.
  • Re-check IRB/ethics and consent, transplant-donor consent where relevant, animal-care/IACUC approval, ICMJE authorship and conflict-of-interest disclosure, funding, and AI-use disclosure.
  • If the live official instructions conflict with this skill, the official instructions win.

Pre-submission self-check

  • The study delivers a clear kidney-disease mechanism or a practice-changing nephrology finding.
  • Clinical kidney endpoints are prespecified and powered; trials are registered with the number in the manuscript.
  • The correct reporting checklist (CONSORT/STROBE/PRISMA/ARRIVE) is completed and attached.
  • Basic/translational work shows controls, replication, model validation, and human anchoring.
  • Mechanistic claims rest on perturbation evidence, not association alone.
  • IRB/consent, IACUC (if animal), ICMJE disclosures, and a data-availability statement are prepared.

Common desk-reject triggers

  • Single-center descriptive series or registry slice with no mechanism and no practice change.
  • Association-only biomarker/-omics studies with no validation cohort or functional follow-up.
  • Animal/cell kidney work without human relevance, replication, or ARRIVE-aligned rigor.
  • Missing trial registration, protocol, or the required reporting checklist.
  • Incremental dialysis/transplant outcome reports with limited generalizability or novelty.

Re-routing decision

  • Global-perspective or epidemiology-heavy nephrology with less mechanistic depth → kidney-international.
  • Diabetic kidney disease framed primarily around endocrine/metabolic mechanism → diabetologia / journal-of-clinical-endocrinology-and-metabolism.
  • Critical-care AKI dominated by ICU organ-support → critical-care-medicine / american-journal-of-respiratory-and-critical-care-medicine.
  • Broad practice-changing nephrology trial → general medicine (jama / NEJM / The Lancet in the natural-science bundle).
  • Pure renal cell biology with no disease anchor → a basic-science venue in the natural-science bundle.

Output format

[Fit] High / Medium / Low (one-line reason)
[Target] Journal of the American Society of Nephrology (ASN)
[Specialty tags] <CKD / AKI / dialysis / transplant / renal physiology + clinical/translational/basic>
[Study design / reporting guideline] <RCT-CONSORT / cohort-STROBE / review-PRISMA / animal-ARRIVE>
[Method/evidence] <power, mechanism, controls/replication, registration>
[Top risk] <the single most likely reason for rejection>
[Official items to re-check] <article type / registration / checklist / IACUC / consent / disclosures>
[Re-route suggestion] <if not a fit, a better-matched venue>

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 328,083. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.