agentsclimarketplace

Ajps workflow

Skill brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/American-Journal-of-Political-Science-Skills/skills/ajps-workflow

Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. | 覆盖主流期刊的 Claude Code/Codex 期刊技能包,从选题、识别策略到表格规范与审稿回复全流程,助你快速发论文。

Install
npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill ajps-workflow

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

What its author says it does

Copied from the file, not written here

Use as the entry point for any American Journal of Political Science (AJPS) manuscript. Routes to the right AJPS sub-skill based on lifecycle stage and which submission type (Article, Research Note, Correspondence) fits, and reminds you that AJPS re-runs your code via a third-party verifier before publishing. It dispatches; it does not draft content.

SKILL.md

5.0 KB, ~1.0k tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it

AJPS Workflow Router (ajps-workflow)

The orchestrator for an AJPS submission. Figure out the stage and the submission type, then send the user to the matching skill. AJPS is the MPSA's flagship, Wiley-published, double-blind journal whose defining feature is mandatory third-party verification of replication materials before publication — so this router also makes sure reproducibility is engineered from the start, not bolted on at acceptance.

When to trigger

  • Starting a new AJPS paper and unsure where to begin
  • Mid-project and unsure which skill applies next
  • Deciding whether the paper is an Article, Research Note, or Correspondence
  • Returning with a decision letter (route to ajps-rebuttal)

First question: which submission type?

SituationTypeRoute to
Full original studyArticle (<= 10,000 words)normal pipeline below
A methodology advance or a meta-analysisResearch Note (<= 4,000 words)normal pipeline, tighter scope
Critique / correction of a paper already published in AJPSCorrespondence (<= 4,000 words)ajps-literature-positioning + ajps-data-analysis

The Research Note is not a short empirical paper — at AJPS it is reserved for methodology (including methodology in normative theory) and meta-analyses. Do not mis-route a small empirical study into it.

Routing map (stage -> skill)

Idea / fit?                       -> ajps-topic-selection
Where does it sit in the field?   -> ajps-literature-positioning
What's the argument?              -> ajps-theory-building
Is the design identified?         -> ajps-research-design
Are the analyses sound?           -> ajps-data-analysis
Are the exhibits clear?           -> ajps-tables-figures
Does it read well + fit caps?     -> ajps-writing-style
Will the code re-run for a verifier? -> ajps-replication-and-verification
How will it be judged?            -> ajps-review-process
Ready to submit?                  -> ajps-submission
Got an R&R / decision?            -> ajps-rebuttal

Default order

topic-selection -> literature-positioning -> theory-building -> research-design -> data-analysis -> tables-figures -> writing-style -> replication-and-verification -> review-process -> submission -> rebuttal

Iterate: theory <-> design <-> analysis usually loops several times. Critically, start the replication-and-verification package while you analyze — at acceptance an independent verifier re-runs your code, and an unscripted analysis cannot be fixed quickly under deadline.

Anti-patterns

  • Treating reproducibility as a post-acceptance chore — AJPS verifies before publishing
  • Mis-routing a short empirical study into the methodology-only Research Note type
  • Sending a critique of a non-AJPS paper as Correspondence (it is for published AJPS work)
  • Forgetting that table/figure captions and footnotes count toward the word limit

Router pass for American Journal of Political Science

Run this as a concrete capability pass. First lock the political theory, design leverage, measurement validity, and scope condition; then test whether the manuscript addresses political-science reviewers who expect tight theory, transparent design, and a contribution that travels across political settings.

  • Primary move: Run the pack as fit gate, evidence gate, writing gate, source-map gate, and output contract; stop when a gate lacks evidence.
  • Decision ledger: return claim / evidence / blocker / next edit rows so the next pass can patch the manuscript directly.
  • Sibling comparison: compare against APSR for field-wide breadth, Journal of Politics for broader political-science audience, Political Analysis for methods-first work; if the neighboring outlet has the stronger audience claim, recommend re-routing before polishing.
  • Verification floor: before submission-ready advice, re-open resources/official-source-map.md for volatile rules and name the one unresolved fact that could change the recommendation.

Output format

【Stage】idea / positioning / theory / design / analysis / exhibits / writing / replication / review / submit / rebut
【Type】Article / Research Note (methodology|meta-analysis) / Correspondence
【Route to】ajps-<skill>
【Why】one line
【Then】the next skill after that

Supplementary resources

What ships with it

Read from the repository

Just SKILL.md. No reference files, no scripts.

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 328,083. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.