Aejmic workflow
Skill brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/AEJ-Microeconomics-Skills/skills/aejmic-workflow
Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. | 覆盖主流期刊的 Claude Code/Codex 期刊技能包,从选题、识别策略到表格规范与审稿回复全流程,助你快速发论文。
npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill aejmic-workflowAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Use when deciding which aejmic-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from topic selection through rebuttal for an American Economic Journal: Microeconomics (AEJ: Micro) submission. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills.
SKILL.md
6.8 KB, ~1.6k tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it
AEJ: Micro Workflow Router (aejmic-workflow)
Overview
This is the router. It tells you which aejmic- skill to use at the current stage* of a manuscript aimed at the American Economic Journal: Microeconomics (AEJ: Micro) — the American Economic Association's quarterly journal (founded 2009, one of four AEJs) for microeconomic THEORY and its applications: game theory, mechanism and market design, industrial-organization theory, contract theory, information economics, decision theory, behavioral theory, and theory-grounded experiments. AEJ: Micro is theory-first — it rewards a clean, general, well-motivated result, with structural/experimental applications welcome when the economics is the point.
Default assumption: unless the user says otherwise, treat the target as AEJ: Micro. Operational tells that you are at AEJ: Micro and not a sibling: it wants broad micro interest + the AEA editorial process (vs. specialist JET / GEB / Theoretical Economics); it is less abstract/methodological than TE or Econometrica; and it is theory, not empirical applied micro (that is AEJ: Applied). Process tells: single-blind review via the AEA submission system (author revealed to referees; referees anonymous), a submission fee (AEA member rate — volatile), JEL classification per AEA practice, and the AEA Data and Code Availability Policy for any paper with data, code, experiments, or numerical results. Re-verify volatile specifics on the official AEA pages (see resources/official-source-map.md).
When to trigger
- The user asks "what should I do next?"
- A draft needs its current bottleneck diagnosed
- Work is ping-ponging between the model, the proofs, the framing, and the response letter
- An AEJ: Micro decision letter arrived and the user needs to switch into revision mode
Routing table
| Current symptom | Next skill |
|---|---|
| Unsure the question is broad-micro-interesting theory (not JET/TE/AEJ:Applied) | aejmic-topic-selection |
| Contribution vs. the closest existing result is fuzzy or oversold | aejmic-literature-positioning |
| The model, equilibrium concept, or proof architecture is the bottleneck | aejmic-theory-model |
| Unclear what makes the result tight / which assumption is doing the work | aejmic-identification |
| Extensions, edge cases, or (applied) robustness checks are missing | aejmic-robustness |
| Propositions, numerical examples, or experimental exhibits are messy | aejmic-tables-figures |
| Prose buries the result; abstract/intro do not land | aejmic-writing-style |
| Proof appendix, numerical/structural/experimental code deposit, README | aejmic-replication-package |
| Want to anticipate referee objections / calibrate desk-reject odds | aejmic-referee-strategy |
| Ready to submit via the AEA system; need a preflight | aejmic-submission |
| Received an R&R; need a response-letter strategy | aejmic-rebuttal |
Default order
aejmic-topic-selection— lock a broad-interest microeconomic-theory questionaejmic-literature-positioning— stake the result against the closest theoremaejmic-theory-model— the central skill: model, equilibrium concept, proof strategyaejmic-identification— what makes the result tight / what identifies parametersaejmic-robustness— extensions, edge cases, applied robustnessaejmic-tables-figures— propositions, numerical examples, experimental tablesaejmic-writing-style— make the result land (abstract + intro last)aejmic-replication-package— proof appendix + code (AEA Data Editor)aejmic-referee-strategy— pre-empt the objections theory referees raiseaejmic-submission— AEA system preflight (single-blind, JEL, fee)aejmic-rebuttal— after the R&R
aejmic-writing-styleis a late-stage polish; do not rewrite the intro before the model and proofs settle.
Anti-patterns
- Polishing prose or exhibits while the model or main proof is still moving —
aejmic-theory-modelmust settle first - Treating AEJ: Micro like JET/GEB (specialist, maximal generality) or AEJ: Applied (empirical) — wrong fit gate
- Deferring the proof appendix and any numerical/experimental code until acceptance — the AEA Data Editor checks before publication
- Reporting an applied result with significance asterisks instead of standard errors
Routing by paper archetype
AEJ: Micro spans several branches; the bottleneck differs. Read the archetype, then enter the chain at the right link.
| Archetype | Likely first bottleneck | Enter at |
|---|---|---|
| pure theory (mechanism/game/decision) | equilibrium concept + proof strategy + generality | aejmic-theory-model |
| theory with structural estimation | parameter identification + counterfactual validity | aejmic-identification → aejmic-theory-model |
| theory-grounded experiment | design maps to the model's prediction; pre-registration | aejmic-topic-selection → aejmic-identification |
| IO theory / applied micro-theory | the mechanism's robustness to modeling choices | aejmic-theory-model → aejmic-robustness |
Worked routing example (illustrative)
A user says: "My mechanism-design result is proved, but a referee says it hinges on a knife-edge tie-breaking assumption and asks whether it survives a continuum of types." That is two distinct AEJ: Micro pushbacks — which assumption is doing the work (owned by aejmic-identification) and does the mechanism extend (owned by aejmic-robustness), both anchored to aejmic-theory-model. Route to aejmic-theory-model to restate the proof under the relaxed assumption, then aejmic-robustness for the continuum extension; only once the proposition is stable do you return to aejmic-tables-figures and aejmic-rebuttal.
Minimal decision snippet
if decision_letter_arrived: -> aejmic-rebuttal
elif ready_to_submit: -> aejmic-submission
elif anticipating_referees: -> aejmic-referee-strategy
elif proof_appendix_or_code: -> aejmic-replication-package
elif prose_or_intro: -> aejmic-writing-style
elif exhibits_or_examples: -> aejmic-tables-figures
elif extensions_or_edge_cases: -> aejmic-robustness
elif which_assumption_or_id: -> aejmic-identification
elif model_or_proof_unsettled: -> aejmic-theory-model
elif fit_or_positioning_fuzzy: -> aejmic-topic-selection / aejmic-literature-positioning
else: -> aejmic-topic-selection
What ships with it
Read from the repository
Just SKILL.md. No reference files, no scripts.