agentsclimarketplace

Advmat figures

Skill brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/Advanced-Materials-Skills/skills/advmat-figures

Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. | 覆盖主流期刊的 Claude Code/Codex 期刊技能包,从选题、识别策略到表格规范与审稿回复全流程,助你快速发论文。

Install
npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill advmat-figures

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

What its author says it does

Copied from the file, not written here

Use when designing or auditing figures for an Advanced Materials manuscript, including the lead figure, multi-panel characterization figures, and the Table-of-Contents graphic, where visual quality is a house expectation. Designs figure strategy; does not run the analysis or write prose.

SKILL.md

5.3 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it

Advanced Materials Figures (advmat-figures)

When to trigger

  • You have many candidate panels and need a coherent figure set
  • Your lead figure does not convey the central advance at a glance
  • Characterization panels are crowded, mislabeled, or unreadable at column width
  • You have no Table-of-Contents (TOC) graphic, or it is an afterthought
  • A coauthor wants to "add one more panel just in case"

Figure strategy for Adv. Mater.

Advanced Materials is a visually demanding journal — striking, cover-quality figures are a house expectation, and the journal actively selects work for cover art. But visual polish must serve the science. The hierarchy:

  • Lead figure (Figure 1) — usually a schematic of the material/design concept plus the single most decisive piece of evidence. A reader skimming should grasp the advance from this figure and its caption alone.
  • Characterization figures — each closes one link of the structure → property → function chain (e.g. one figure for structure by XRD/TEM, one for the property, one for the device + benchmarking).
  • The TOC graphic — a small, self-explaining image plus a short blurb that sells the advance to a browsing reader; treat it as a designed object, not a cropped panel.
  • Everything else — optimization sweeps, extra samples, raw traces → Supporting Information.

If a panel does not advance the central claim or one essential link, move it to the SI.

Multi-panel characterization figures

Materials figures are dense by nature; discipline keeps them readable:

PrinciplePractice
One figure, one linkGroup panels that jointly prove one claim (e.g. all structure)
Reading orderLabel (a),(b),(c) top-left to bottom-right; caption follows it
Scale bars, alwaysEvery micrograph carries a scale bar in the image, not only the caption
Consistent color-codingThe same sample/condition keeps one color across all figures
Annotate the featureArrow/label the lattice fringe, peak, or interface that matters
Overlay, don't scatterShow theory-vs-experiment or before-vs-after on shared axes

Production standards (Wiley format)

  • Design for the journal's two-column layout; check legibility at final printed width.
  • Fonts, axis labels, and tick numbers legible at print size; keep a consistent typeface across figures.
  • Vector formats for line art/schematics; high-resolution raster (meeting Wiley's DPI requirement) for micrographs — verify the current DPI/format spec.
  • Color is free in Adv. Mater. (online and print), but keep palettes color-blind-safe and distinguishable in grayscale; never encode by color alone.
  • Define every symbol, abbreviation, and unit in the caption; give micrographs their scale and technique.
  • Match nomenclature and units to the main text; use SI units and consistent significant figures.

The TOC graphic and cover art

  • The TOC entry (graphic + short text) is a required, high-visibility asset — design it to communicate the advance to a non-specialist in one glance.
  • If aiming for cover consideration, prepare a separate high-resolution cover image; do not repurpose a cramped data panel. Verify current cover-submission format and dimensions.

Checklist

  • Figure 1 conveys the central advance (concept + decisive evidence) at a glance
  • Each figure closes exactly one link of the structure → property → function chain
  • Every micrograph has an in-image scale bar and names its technique
  • Sample/condition color-coding is consistent across all figures
  • Legible at two-column print width; consistent fonts and units
  • Color-blind-safe and grayscale-distinguishable; not color-dependent
  • A designed TOC graphic + blurb exists and sells the advance
  • Non-essential panels/datasets moved to the SI

Anti-patterns

  • A lead figure too dense to parse without the main text
  • Micrographs with no scale bar, or scale bars only mentioned in the caption
  • Ten-panel megafigures that bury the takeaway
  • Inconsistent color-coding of the same sample across figures
  • Color-only encoding that fails in grayscale or for color-blind readers
  • A TOC graphic that is a cropped, unreadable data panel

Output format

【Figure count】N — each essential?  yes / cut list
【Fig. 1 conveys the advance at a glance】yes / redesign
【Per-figure single chain-link】list
【Scale bars on all micrographs】yes / fix
【Consistent color-coding】yes / fix
【Color-blind / grayscale safe】yes / fix
【TOC graphic】designed + blurb?  yes / fix
【Next】advmat-supplementary (SI) or advmat-length-management (fit format)

Figure DPI, format, TOC-graphic, and cover-art specifications are set by Wiley and change — verify current requirements on the official Advanced Materials author page.

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 328,083. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.