agentsclimarketplace

Amj tables figures

Skill brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/Academy-of-Management-Journal-Skills/skills/amj-tables-figures

Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. | 覆盖主流期刊的 Claude Code/Codex 期刊技能包,从选题、识别策略到表格规范与审稿回复全流程,助你快速发论文。

Install
npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill amj-tables-figures

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

What its author says it does

Copied from the file, not written here

Use when building or cleaning the tables and figures for an Academy of Management Journal (AMJ) manuscript — correlation tables, regression/SEM/HLM result tables, the theoretical-model figure, and interaction plots in AOM house style. Finalizes exhibits; it does not run the analysis (amj-data-analysis) or frame the contribution (amj-contribution-framing).

SKILL.md

5.5 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it

Tables & Figures (amj-tables-figures)

When to trigger

  • Result tables are cluttered, hard to read, or not self-explanatory
  • The correlation/descriptives table is missing reliabilities or has inconsistent decimals
  • Interaction effects are reported only in text, not plotted
  • The theoretical model has no figure, or the figure does not match the hypotheses
  • Tables/figures are off AOM house style (verify the current AMJ Style Guide for Authors)

The exhibits an AMJ paper expects

  1. Means, SDs, and correlations table — typically Table 1; reliabilities on the diagonal in parentheses; note significance.
  2. Main results table(s) — regression/SEM/HLM, organized by nested models (controls → main effects → interactions), with standardized or unstandardized coefficients consistently labeled.
  3. Theoretical model figure — boxes and arrows mapping one-to-one to the hypotheses (H1, H2, …).
  4. Interaction/simple-slopes plots — one figure per significant interaction, with high/low moderator lines and axis labels in construct terms.
  5. Mediation/path figure where SEM is used — coefficients on paths, fit indices noted.

House-style discipline (verify against the current AOM Style Guide)

  • Self-contained: a reader should understand each table/figure from its title and notes alone.
  • Title above the table; comprehensive note below defines abbreviations, N, SE type, and significance markers.
  • Significance: use consistent markers (e.g., † p<.10, * p<.05, ** p<.01, *** p<.001) and define them in the note; state whether tests are one- or two-tailed.
  • Standard errors / CIs: report SEs (or CIs) in parentheses; be consistent across tables.
  • Decimals: consistent precision (commonly two decimals); align on the decimal point.
  • Nested models: report model fit / ΔR² / Δ-2LL across steps so the incremental contribution of interactions is visible.
  • Exhibits do not count toward the page limit. AOM's 40-page main-body maximum excludes tables and figures (it includes text, references, and appendices), so move dense supporting material into well-built exhibits rather than crowding the prose — but keep each exhibit genuinely necessary, not padding.
  • Confirm current limits on number/format of exhibits and figure resolution against the AMJ Style Guide for Authors and the ScholarOne portal.

Figures

  • Theoretical-model figure: clean boxes/arrows; label each path with its hypothesis number; no decorative clutter.
  • Interaction plots: plot predicted values of the DV across the predictor at ±1 SD of the moderator; label lines; keep the y-axis in the DV's metric.
  • Use grayscale-safe designs; ensure figures are legible in print and meet the resolution the portal requires.

Execution bridge (StatsPAI / Stata MCP)

Generate exhibits from the fitted result, not by retyping numbers (the usual source of body-vs-appendix drift). Full map: execution-with-mcp. AMJ is empirical management — panel, multilevel, DiD, IV, and field/lab experiments; the chain below serves that lane, while grounded-theory / qualitative work uses its own standards.

  • Tables: etable (multi-model columns) or did_summary_to_latex straight from the result_id.
  • Figures: plot_from_result / enhanced_event_study_plot / event_study_table — axis units and the SE/clustering note baked in.
  • Every note names the estimator + clustering and states the effect size in interpretable units.

See a full fitted-result → exhibit chain in the JF execution walkthrough.

Checklist

  • Table 1 = means, SDs, correlations, with reliabilities on the diagonal
  • Result tables use nested models with ΔR²/fit reported across steps
  • SEs/CIs in parentheses; consistent decimals and alignment
  • Significance markers defined in notes; one-/two-tailed stated
  • Every significant interaction has a simple-slopes plot
  • Theoretical-model figure maps one-to-one to the hypotheses
  • Each exhibit is self-contained (title + complete note)
  • Exhibit count/format checked against the AMJ Style Guide (tables/figures are excluded from the 40-page limit)

Anti-patterns

  • Wall-of-numbers tables with no nested structure and no fit statistics.
  • Undefined abbreviations or missing N/SE-type in notes.
  • Interactions reported in text only — reviewers expect a plot.
  • Model figure that contradicts the hypotheses (extra/missing arrows).
  • Inconsistent decimals/significance markers across tables.
  • Color-only figures that are unreadable in grayscale or below required resolution.

Output format

【Table 1】means/SD/correlations + reliabilities on diagonal? yes/no
【Result tables】nested models + ΔR²/fit reported? yes/no
【Interaction plots】one per significant interaction? yes/no
【Model figure】matches hypotheses one-to-one? yes/no
【Self-contained】all titles/notes complete? yes/no
【House-style check】markers/SE/decimals/resolution vs. AOM guide: pass/fix
【Next step】amj-writing-style

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 328,083. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.