agentsclimarketplace

Aamas camera ready

Skill brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/AAMAS-Skills/skills/aamas-camera-ready

Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. | 覆盖主流期刊的 Claude Code/Codex 期刊技能包,从选题、识别策略到表格规范与审稿回复全流程,助你快速发论文。

Install
npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills --skill aamas-camera-ready

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

What its author says it does

Copied from the file, not written here

Use when preparing an accepted AAMAS paper for the IFAAMAS open-access camera-ready, covering author de-anonymization, proceedings metadata, two-column reflow of game figures and learning curves, resolving rebuttal-stage promises, registration, in-person presentation, and the public code and environment release for a multiagent paper.

SKILL.md

4.0 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it

AAMAS Camera Ready

Use this after acceptance. Reopen the current AAMAS camera-ready instructions, the proceedings author kit, the registration page, and the decision notice before advising authors; AAMAS proceedings are published open-access by IFAAMAS.

Camera-ready audit

  • Convert the anonymous submission to the public version: author names, affiliations, acknowledgements, funding, and de-anonymized code, data, and environment links.
  • Apply the current final-page rules and template. Confirm whether the accepted-paper mode changes the page budget from the 8-page submission body, and reflow accordingly.
  • Check proceedings metadata: title, abstract, author order and ORCID, subject areas, bibliography, and any required copyright or release form.
  • Integrate every rebuttal-stage promise without expanding the accepted contribution: a wording fix, a moved assumption, or an added caption line - not a new experiment.
  • Prepare the public artifact: repository, multiagent environments, opponent/population sets, seeds, checkpoints, and an archival citation, now that anonymity no longer applies.
  • Confirm registration and in-person presentation obligations for at least one author.

Anonymous-to-final flip: what to recheck

ElementSubmission (anonymous)Camera-ready (final)
Page oneTracking number, no author blockAuthor names, affiliations, ORCID
Acknowledgements / fundingRemovedRestored
Code / environment linksAnonymized placeholderPublic, licensed, citable archive
Self-citation phrasing"prior work [anon]"Natural first-person, de-anonymized
Page budget8-page bodyConfirm the accepted-paper budget, then reflow

Two-column reflow for multiagent papers

  • Switching the style file from anonymous to final mode changes spacing; recheck every page break, figure placement, and table width after the flip.
  • Extensive-form game trees, payoff matrices, and multi-panel learning curves often need full-width spans; verify nothing is clipped at the column boundary.
  • Material that fit under the tracking number can overflow once the author block and acknowledgements are added; confirm rather than assume the budget absorbs it.
  • Keep theorem, assumption, and game-definition numbering identical to the reviewed version so the public reviews on OpenReview remain traceable to the final text.

De-anonymization sweep

  • Restore the author block, acknowledgements, grants, and contribution statements the anonymous version stripped.
  • Rewrite anonymized self-citations ("prior work [anon]") into natural first-person form.
  • Replace anonymized repository placeholders with the public, licensed, citable archive, and test every link and every environment install from a logged-out machine.

Worked example: honoring a rebuttal promise

The area chair accepted on the condition that the paper add a held-out opponent to the evaluation, which the rebuttal promised. Camera-ready move: add the one opponent, report it with the same seeds and standard errors as the others, and add a sentence to the protocol - without re-tuning the method or re-framing the contribution the reviewers evaluated.

Hedged logistics

  • Registration pricing, copyright-form mechanics, the exact camera-ready date, and the proceedings template can change every cycle; confirm against the decision notice and current author kit.

Output format

[Camera-ready status] Ready / Needs fixes / Blocked
[Final package] <PDF/source/bib/metadata/forms/artifacts>
[Policy checks] <page/authors/presentation/registration/artifact release>
[Rebuttal-promise map] <promise -> final edit>
[Remaining owner] <person -> task>

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 328,083. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.