agentsclimarketplace

Visual reasoner

Skill Biolytics-AI/rhetoric-engine/skills/visual-reasoner

Biolytics Rhetoric Engine: a staged presentation cognition pipeline for user-led slide creation

Install
npx -y skills add Biolytics-AI/rhetoric-engine --skill visual-reasoner

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

One thing to look at

  • 1 stars1 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.

What its author says it does

Copied from the file, not written here

Use after a slide thesis is clear to choose the visual reasoning pattern that makes each slide thesis understandable and believable through charts, diagrams, annotations, or other nondecorative visual forms.

SKILL.md

3.6 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it

Visual Reasoner

Choose visual forms that help the audience reason from thesis to belief. Do not choose visuals before the slide thesis is clear.

Inputs

  • Approved slide thesis map with audience question, answer thesis, and proof job per slide.
  • Argument spine, evidence needs, and known objections.
  • Available data, examples, images, diagrams, source material, and constraints.
  • Cognitive design notes, accessibility requirements, and medium constraints when available.

Outputs

Return a Visual Reasoning Plan with:

  • visual_plan_per_slide: selected reasoning pattern, visual role, key encodings, and audience takeaway.
  • chart_diagram_recommendations: chart, diagram, table, map, timeline, process, hierarchy, comparison, or annotated figure choices.
  • annotation_plan: labels, callouts, emphasis, sequencing, and explanation needed to make the visual believable.
  • rejected_visuals: decorative, weak, misleading, or thesis-mismatched visuals and why they were rejected.

Workflow

  1. Confirm the slide thesis, audience question, and proof job are explicit.
  2. Select a visual reasoning pattern that matches the thinking task: compare, sequence, locate, quantify, classify, explain causality, show structure, reveal change, or decide.
  3. Map evidence to visual elements only where it proves, clarifies, or qualifies the thesis.
  4. Recommend the simplest chart or diagram that makes the relationship legible and credible.
  5. Plan annotations that direct attention to the claim-relevant signal, not every available detail.
  6. Reject visuals that decorate, imply unsupported causality, hide uncertainty, or compete with the thesis.
  7. Flag slides that need stronger evidence, a clearer thesis, or cognitive design review before visual selection can proceed.

Evaluation Checks

  • Every visual has a reasoning job tied to the slide thesis.
  • The recommended form fits the data relationship and audience task.
  • Annotations make the belief path visible.
  • Decorative or weak visuals are explicitly rejected.
  • Uncertainty, caveats, and comparisons are not visually distorted.
  • No visual choice depends on a specific renderer or slide backend.

Failure Modes

  • Choosing a chart because data exists instead of because it proves the thesis.
  • Selecting visual style before the thesis is stable.
  • Using illustrations, icons, or photos as decoration.
  • Encoding too many variables for the audience's decision need.
  • Hiding caveats or uncertainty to make the visual cleaner.
  • Creating visuals that contradict cognitive design or accessibility constraints.

Next Route

  • If visual reasoning is blocked by unclear theses: return to slide-thesis-mapper.
  • If visual reasoning is blocked by weak or missing proof: load evidence-curator.
  • If visual choices create hierarchy, density, or accessibility risks: load cognitive-designer.
  • If the Visual Reasoning Plan is complete and content is too dense: load content-distiller.
  • If visual reasoning, cognitive design, evidence, and content fit are sufficient: load deck-compiler.
  • This artifact feeds the whole presentation by making every chart, diagram, image, annotation, or table serve the approved slide thesis rather than decoration.

Handoff

Handoff the Visual Reasoning Plan to cognitive-designer, evidence-curator, or deck compilation. Include rejected visuals and unresolved evidence or thesis issues so downstream work does not substitute decoration for reasoning.

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 328,083. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.