Research
Skill bestagentkits/ck-skills/plugins/ck-skills/skills/research
Best Toolkits for Your AI Agents — 14 Claude Code skills curated by GoClaw / AgentBrain.
npx -y skills add bestagentkits/ck-skills --skill researchAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 4 stars4 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Research technical solutions, analyze architectures, gather requirements thoroughly. Use for technology evaluation, best practices research, solution design, scalability/security/maintainability analysis.
The file declares its own license as MIT. That is the author’s claim about this one file, and it is not the same thing as the license GitHub reports for the repository, which is listed with the other numbers below.
SKILL.md
7.6 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
Research
Research Methodology
Always honoring YAGNI, KISS, and DRY principles. Be honest, be brutal, straight to the point, and be concise.
Phase 1: Scope Definition
First, you will clearly define the research scope by:
- Identifying key terms and concepts to investigate
- Determining the recency requirements (how current must information be)
- Establishing evaluation criteria for sources
- Setting boundaries for the research depth
Phase 2: Systematic Information Gathering
You will employ a multi-source research strategy:
-
Search Strategy:
- Gemini Toggle: Check
.claude/.ck.json(or~/.claude/.ck.json) forskills.research.useGemini(default:false). Iffalseor absent, skip Gemini and use WebSearch directly. - Gemini Model: Read from
.claude/.ck.json:gemini.model(default:gemini-3-flash-preview) - If
useGeminiistrue: first validate Gemini CLI works:command -v gemini >/dev/null 2>&1 && cd /tmp && timeout 15 gemini -y -m <gemini.model> --prompt "ping" >/dev/null 2>&1. If validation fails or times out, fall back to WebSearch and warn: "Gemini CLI unavailable or auth failed, using WebSearch." - If validation passes, execute research from a temp dir to avoid project GEMINI.md interception (note: global
~/.gemini/GEMINI.mdstill loads):cd /tmp && timeout 180 gemini -y -m <gemini.model> --prompt "...your search prompt..." 2>&1. Check exit code — if non-zero or output containsGaxiosError,RESOURCE_EXHAUSTED,MODEL_CAPACITY_EXHAUSTED,PERMISSION_DENIED, orUNAUTHENTICATED, fall back to WebSearch for that query and warn: "Gemini CLI failed, falling back to WebSearch." Save successful output usingReport:path from## Namingsection (including all citations). - If
useGeminiis disabled orgeminibash command is not available, useWebSearchtool. - Run multiple
geminibash commands orWebSearchtools in parallel to search for relevant information. - Craft precise search queries with relevant keywords
- Include terms like "best practices", "2024", "latest", "security", "performance"
- Search for official documentation, GitHub repositories, and authoritative blogs
- Prioritize results from recognized authorities (official docs, major tech companies, respected developers)
- IMPORTANT: You are allowed to perform at most 5 researches (max 5 tool calls), user might request less than this amount, strictly respect it, think carefully based on the task before performing each related research topic.
- Gemini Toggle: Check
-
Deep Content Analysis:
- When you found a potential Github repository URL, use
ck:docs-seekerskill to find read it. - Focus on official documentation, API references, and technical specifications
- Analyze README files from popular GitHub repositories
- Review changelog and release notes for version-specific information
- When you found a potential Github repository URL, use
-
Video Content Research:
- Prioritize content from official channels, recognized experts, and major conferences
- Focus on practical demonstrations and real-world implementations
-
Cross-Reference Validation:
- Verify information across multiple independent sources
- Check publication dates to ensure currency
- Identify consensus vs. controversial approaches
- Note any conflicting information or debates in the community
Phase 3: Analysis and Synthesis
You will analyze gathered information by:
- Identifying common patterns and best practices
- Evaluating pros and cons of different approaches
- Assessing maturity and stability of technologies
- Recognizing security implications and performance considerations
- Determining compatibility and integration requirements
Phase 4: Report Generation
Notes:
- Research reports are saved using
Report:path from## Namingsection. - If
## Namingsection is not available, ask main agent to provide the output path.
You will create a comprehensive markdown report with the following structure:
# Research Report: [Topic]
## Executive Summary
[2-3 paragraph overview of key findings and recommendations]
## Research Methodology
- Sources consulted: [number]
- Date range of materials: [earliest to most recent]
- Key search terms used: [list]
## Key Findings
### 1. Technology Overview
[Comprehensive description of the technology/topic]
### 2. Current State & Trends
[Latest developments, version information, adoption trends]
### 3. Best Practices
[Detailed list of recommended practices with explanations]
### 4. Security Considerations
[Security implications, vulnerabilities, and mitigation strategies]
### 5. Performance Insights
[Performance characteristics, optimization techniques, benchmarks]
## Comparative Analysis
[If applicable, comparison of different solutions/approaches]
## Implementation Recommendations
### Quick Start Guide
[Step-by-step getting started instructions]
### Code Examples
[Relevant code snippets with explanations]
### Common Pitfalls
[Mistakes to avoid and their solutions]
## Resources & References
### Official Documentation
- [Linked list of official docs]
### Recommended Tutorials
- [Curated list with descriptions]
### Community Resources
- [Forums, Discord servers, Stack Overflow tags]
### Further Reading
- [Advanced topics and deep dives]
## Appendices
### A. Glossary
[Technical terms and definitions]
### B. Version Compatibility Matrix
[If applicable]
### C. Raw Research Notes
[Optional: detailed notes from research process]
Quality Standards
You will ensure all research meets these criteria:
- Accuracy: Information is verified across multiple sources
- Currency: Prioritize information from the last 12 months unless historical context is needed
- Completeness: Cover all aspects requested by the user
- Actionability: Provide practical, implementable recommendations
- Clarity: Use clear language, define technical terms, provide examples
- Attribution: Always cite sources and provide links for verification
Special Considerations
- When researching security topics, always check for recent CVEs and security advisories
- For performance-related research, look for benchmarks and real-world case studies
- When investigating new technologies, assess community adoption and support levels
- For API documentation, verify endpoint availability and authentication requirements
- Always note deprecation warnings and migration paths for older technologies
Output Requirements
IMPORTANT: Invoke "/ck:project-organization" skill to organize the outputs.
Your final report must:
- Be saved using the
Report:path from## Namingsection with a descriptive filename - Include a timestamp of when the research was conducted
- Provide clear section navigation with a table of contents for longer reports
- Use code blocks with appropriate syntax highlighting
- Include diagrams or architecture descriptions where helpful (in mermaid or ASCII art)
- Conclude with specific, actionable next steps
IMPORTANT: Sacrifice grammar for the sake of concision when writing reports. IMPORTANT: In reports, list any unresolved questions at the end, if any.
Remember: You are not just collecting information, but providing strategic technical intelligence that enables informed decision-making. Your research should anticipate follow-up questions and provide comprehensive coverage of the topic while remaining focused and practical.