agentsclimarketplace

Verify security

Skill Aurite-ai/agent-verifier/skills/verify-security

Agent Verifier is a coding agent skill that verifies code against organizational policies, code quality patterns, security requirements, and framework best practices — before code ships. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, Windsurf, and 30+ agents.

Install
npx -y skills add Aurite-ai/agent-verifier --skill verify-security

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

What its author says it does

Copied from the file, not written here

Verify code for security issues including hardcoded secrets, input validation, error exposure, and dependency vulnerabilities. Use when asked to "verify security", "check for secrets", or "scan for vulnerabilities".

SKILL.md

7.1 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it

Security Verification

Purpose

Verify code for security anti-patterns and vulnerabilities. All analysis happens locally—code never leaves your machine.

When to Use

Trigger this skill when the user asks to:

  • "verify agent security"
  • "verify security"
  • "check for secrets"
  • "scan for vulnerabilities"
  • "security audit"

Note: For full verification including patterns, quality, and language-specific checks, tell the user to say "verify agent".

Process

Step 1: Discover Files

Locate files to analyze:

Configuration files:

  • package.json, pyproject.toml, Cargo.toml - Dependencies
  • .env, .env.example, .env.local - Environment files
  • config.py, settings.py, config.ts - Configuration

Source files:

  • *.py, *.ts, *.js, *.go, *.rs - Source code
  • Prioritize files with: auth, api, client, secret, config in name

Exclude:

  • node_modules/, .venv/, venv/, __pycache__/
  • *.test.*, *.spec.*, *_test.go

Step 2: Run Security Checks

Check Tiers

  • [PATTERN] — Mechanical check. Apply exactly as written.
  • [HEURISTIC] — Judgment required. Mark findings clearly.

Tag every finding with [P] for pattern or [H] for heuristic.


2.1 [PATTERN] Hardcoded Secrets

Scan for assignments matching these patterns (case-insensitive):

Variable patternFail condition
API_KEYAssigned to string literal
SECRETAssigned to string literal
PASSWORDAssigned to string literal
TOKENAssigned to string literal
PRIVATE_KEYAssigned to string literal
AWS_ACCESS_KEY_IDAssigned to string literal
AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEYAssigned to string literal

Examples of failures:

# ❌ Issue
API_KEY = "sk-abc123..."
password = "hunter2"
OPENAI_API_KEY = "sk-proj-..."

# ✅ Pass
API_KEY = os.environ["API_KEY"]
password = os.getenv("PASSWORD")
api_key = settings.API_KEY

Also flag:

  • String literals matching known API key patterns:
    • sk-... (OpenAI)
    • sk-ant-... (Anthropic)
    • AKIA... (AWS)
    • ghp_... (GitHub)
    • xoxb-... (Slack)

Severity: ❌ Issue


2.2 [PATTERN] Dependency Version Pinning

Python (requirements.txt):

PatternSeverity
package>=1.0❌ Issue
package>1.0❌ Issue
package (no version)❌ Issue
package==1.0.0✅ Pass
package~=1.0✅ Pass

Python (pyproject.toml):

Check [project.dependencies] and [tool.poetry.dependencies]:

  • Unpinned or >= versions → ❌ Issue
  • Pinned with == or ^ or ~ → ✅ Pass

JavaScript/TypeScript (package.json):

PatternSeverity
"package": "*"❌ Issue
"package": "latest"❌ Issue
"package": ">=1.0.0"⚠️ Warning
"package": "^1.0.0"✅ Pass
"package": "~1.0.0"✅ Pass
"package": "1.0.0"✅ Pass

2.3 [HEURISTIC] Input Validation

Check for external data handling:

Look for:

  • HTTP request handlers (@app.route, router.get, etc.)
  • User input processing (request.body, req.params, input())
  • File uploads
  • Database queries with user input

Flag if:

  • User input is passed directly to database queries without sanitization
  • File paths are constructed from user input without validation
  • JSON parsing without schema validation on external data

Severity: ⚠️ Warning

Example patterns to flag:

# ⚠️ Warning - SQL without parameterization
query = f"SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = {user_id}"

# ⚠️ Warning - Path traversal risk
file_path = os.path.join(base_dir, user_filename)

# ✅ Pass - Parameterized query
cursor.execute("SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = ?", (user_id,))

2.4 [HEURISTIC] Error Message Exposure

Check error handling for information leakage:

Flag if:

  • Stack traces returned in HTTP responses
  • Database error messages exposed to users
  • Internal paths or system info in error messages
  • Debug mode enabled in production code

Look for:

# ⚠️ Warning
except Exception as e:
    return {"error": str(e)}  # Exposes internal details

# ⚠️ Warning
app = Flask(__name__)
app.debug = True  # Debug in production

# ✅ Pass
except Exception as e:
    logger.error(f"Error: {e}")
    return {"error": "An error occurred"}

Severity: ⚠️ Warning


2.5 [HEURISTIC] Secure Defaults

Check configuration for insecure defaults:

SettingInsecureSecure
CORS* (allow all)Specific origins
SSL verificationverify=Falseverify=True or omitted
Debug modedebug=Truedebug=False
Cookie securitysecure=Falsesecure=True
CSRFDisabledEnabled

Examples:

# ⚠️ Warning
requests.get(url, verify=False)
app.config["SESSION_COOKIE_SECURE"] = False
CORS(app, origins="*")

# ✅ Pass
requests.get(url)  # verify=True is default
app.config["SESSION_COOKIE_SECURE"] = True
CORS(app, origins=["https://example.com"])

Severity: ⚠️ Warning


2.6 [HEURISTIC] Sensitive Data Logging

Check logging statements for sensitive data:

Flag if logging includes:

  • Passwords or tokens
  • API keys
  • Personal identifiable information (PII)
  • Credit card numbers
  • Session tokens

Look for:

# ⚠️ Warning
logger.info(f"User login: {username} with password {password}")
print(f"API response: {response.json()}")  # May contain tokens

# ✅ Pass
logger.info(f"User login: {username}")
logger.debug(f"Request to {url}")  # No sensitive data

Severity: ⚠️ Warning


Step 3: Generate Report

# Security Verification Report

**Project:** [name or path]
**Date:** [current date]
**Files analyzed:** [count]

## Summary

✅ X checks passed | ⚠️ Y warnings | ❌ Z issues

## Secrets

- [x] No hardcoded secrets found
- [ ] ❌ Hardcoded secret at `[file:line]`

## Dependencies

- [x] All dependencies pinned
- [ ] ❌ Unpinned dependencies in `[file]`

## Input Validation

- [x] External input properly validated
- [ ] ⚠️ Potential injection at `[file:line]`

## Error Handling

- [x] Errors properly sanitized
- [ ] ⚠️ Information leakage at `[file:line]`

## Findings

> `[P]` = pattern-matched · `[H]` = heuristic

### ✅ Passing
- `[P]` No hardcoded API keys or secrets
- `[P]` Dependencies properly pinned

### ⚠️ Warnings
- `[H]` [Check]: [description]
  - **Location:** [file:line]
  - **Risk:** [what could go wrong]
  - **Suggestion:** [how to fix]

### ❌ Issues
- `[P]` [Check]: [description]
  - **Location:** [file:line]
  - **Rule:** [which rule violated]
  - **Fix:** [specific remediation]

## Recommendations

1. [Priority recommendation]
2. [Additional improvements]

For full verification including patterns, quality, and language-specific checks, say "verify agent".

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 328,083. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.