agentsclimarketplace

Verification

Skill Aurite-ai/agent-verifier/skills/verification

Agent Verifier is a coding agent skill that verifies code against organizational policies, code quality patterns, security requirements, and framework best practices — before code ships. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, Windsurf, and 30+ agents.

Install
npx -y skills add Aurite-ai/agent-verifier --skill verification

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

What its author says it does

Copied from the file, not written here

Full agent verification suite. Runs security, patterns, quality, and language-specific checks. Use when asked to "verify agent", "verify my agent", "audit agent", or "full verification".

SKILL.md

7.3 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it

Agent Verifier

Purpose

Run comprehensive verification on AI agent code. This orchestrator invokes focused verification skills and consolidates results into a unified report. All analysis happens locally—code never leaves your machine.

When to Use

Trigger this skill when the user asks to:

  • "verify agent" (primary invocation)
  • "verify my agent"
  • "audit agent"
  • "full verification"
  • "verify my code" (when agent patterns are detected)
  • "check compliance"

Available Verification Modes

CommandSkillWhat it checks
"verify agent"This skillFull suite (all below)
"verify agent security"verify-securitySecrets, dependencies, input validation
"verify agent patterns"verify-patternsLoops, retries, tools, context size
"verify agent quality"verify-qualityNaming, organization, documentation
"verify agent language"verify-languageType hints, idioms, language best practices

Process

Step 1: Context Discovery

Scan the project to identify:

  1. Primary language:

    • Check for pyproject.toml, package.json, go.mod
    • Look at file extensions in src/ or project root
  2. Agent framework (if any):

    • langgraph in imports → LangGraph
    • crewai in imports → CrewAI
    • autogen in imports → AutoGen
    • langchain in imports → LangChain
    • Direct SDK usage → Custom agent
  3. Kahuna integration:

    • Check if .kahuna/ directory exists
    • If yes, read .kahuna/context-guide.md for organizational rules

Record the detected context for reporting.

Step 2: Run Security Checks

Load the verify-security skill and execute its process.

This checks for:

  • Hardcoded secrets and API keys
  • Dependency version pinning
  • Input validation patterns
  • Error message exposure
  • Secure defaults

Record all findings.

Step 3: Run Pattern Checks

Load the verify-patterns skill and execute its process.

This checks for:

  • Loop safety (termination conditions)
  • Retry limit enforcement
  • Tool registry consistency
  • Context size awareness
  • LangGraph cycle analysis (if applicable)

Record all findings.

Step 4: Run Quality Checks

Load the verify-quality skill and execute its process.

This checks for:

  • Naming conventions
  • Code organization
  • Magic numbers/strings
  • Documentation
  • Error handling patterns

Record all findings.

Step 5: Run Language-Specific Checks

Based on detected language, load the verify-language skill and execute its process.

Python checks:

  • Type hints on public functions
  • Docstrings
  • Requirements pinning
  • Python idioms

TypeScript/JavaScript checks:

  • Strict mode enabled
  • No any types
  • Async/await error handling
  • Promise handling

Go checks:

  • No ignored errors
  • Context propagation
  • Package structure
  • Go idioms

Record all findings.

Step 6: Consolidate Report

Combine all findings from Steps 2-5 into a unified verification report.

Report Format

# Agent Verification Report

**Project:** [project name or path]
**Date:** [current date]
**Mode:** [Kahuna-enhanced | Standalone]
**Language:** [Python | TypeScript | JavaScript | Go]
**Agent framework:** [LangGraph | CrewAI | AutoGen | LangChain | Custom | None]
**Files analyzed:** [count]

## Summary

✅ X checks passed | ⚠️ Y warnings | ❌ Z issues

### By Category
| Category | Pass | Warn | Issue |
|----------|------|------|-------|
| Security | X | X | X |
| Patterns | X | X | X |
| Quality | X | X | X |
| Language | X | X | X |

## Security

*(Summary from verify-security)*

- [x] No hardcoded secrets
- [x] Dependencies pinned
- [ ] ⚠️ [finding]
- [ ] ❌ [finding]

## Agent Patterns

*(Summary from verify-patterns — include only if agent detected)*

### Loop Safety
- [x] All loops have termination conditions
- [ ] ⚠️ Potential unbounded loop at `[file:line]`

### Retry Limits
- [x] All retry mechanisms have explicit limits
- [ ] ❌ Missing retry limit at `[file:line]`

### Tool Consistency
- [x] Tool registry found: X tools defined
- [ ] ❌ Hallucinated tool reference at `[file:line]`
- [ ] ⚠️ Undocumented tool: `[name]`

### Context Size
- [x] System prompt within limits (~X tokens)
- [ ] ⚠️ System prompt exceeds recommended size

## Quality

*(Summary from verify-quality)*

- [x] Naming conventions consistent
- [x] Code well-organized
- [ ] ⚠️ [finding]

## Language ([Python/TypeScript/Go])

*(Summary from verify-language)*

- [x] Type safety enforced
- [ ] ⚠️ [finding]
- [ ] ❌ [finding]

## Detailed Findings

> `[P]` = pattern-matched (structurally reliable) · `[H]` = heuristic (best-effort judgment)

### ✅ Passing
- `[P]` No hardcoded secrets or API keys
- `[P]` All retry decorators have stop conditions
- `[H]` Code organization follows best practices

### ⚠️ Warnings
- `[P|H]` [Check name]: [Description]
  - **Location:** [file:line]
  - **Category:** [Security | Patterns | Quality | Language]
  - **Suggestion:** [How to address]

### ❌ Issues
- `[P|H]` [Check name]: [Description]
  - **Location:** [file:line]
  - **Category:** [Security | Patterns | Quality | Language]
  - **Rule:** [Which rule this violates]
  - **Fix:** [Specific remediation steps]

## Recommendations

1. **[Highest priority]** - [Specific action]
2. **[Second priority]** - [Specific action]
3. [Additional improvements]

---

*Report generated by Agent Verifier v1.0.0*

Step 7: Export Report (Optional)

After presenting the report, ask the user:

Would you like to save this verification report to a file?

If confirmed:

  1. Create the reports directory if it doesn't exist:

    mkdir -p reports/verification
    
  2. Generate filename using the current date and time (NOT placeholders):

    • Get the actual current timestamp from your environment context
    • Format: reports/verification/{date}_{time}.md
    • Date format: YYYY-MM-DD (e.g., 2026-03-17)
    • Time format: HH-MM-SS (e.g., 08-15-42 for 8:15:42 AM)

    IMPORTANT: Use the real current time, not zeros or placeholders. Check your system context for "Current Time" information.

    Example: If the current time is March 17, 2026 at 1:05:30 AM PST, the filename should be: reports/verification/2026-03-17_01-05-30.md

  3. Save the complete report to that file.

Check Tier Discipline

Throughout all verification steps, maintain tier discipline:

  • [PATTERN] checks — Apply exactly as written. A rule says "flag X" → flag X. No judgment.
  • [HEURISTIC] checks — Apply with judgment. Mark findings clearly with [H].

Tag every finding in the report with [P] or [H] so readers understand confidence level.

Notes

  • Privacy first: All code analysis happens locally. Nothing is sent to external services.
  • Kahuna enhances, not requires: The skill works standalone with built-in rules. Kahuna adds organization-specific knowledge.
  • Be specific: Include file names and line numbers when reporting issues.
  • Explain the "why": Help developers understand why each rule matters.
  • Honor existing configs: Respect project's existing lint rules, .editorconfig, etc.

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 328,083. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.