agentsclimarketplace

Experiment

Skill alirezarezvani/gaios/.claude/skills/experiment

Open-source AI Operating System (AIOS) blueprint for Claude Code & Codex — turn any agent into your personal second brain + Chief of Staff: skills, self-verifying workflows, a second-brain wiki, and deterministic tools. Fork it for any role or domain.

Install
npx -y skills add alirezarezvani/gaios --skill experiment

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

One thing to look at

  • no licenseNo license file was found in the repository. Code published without one is not open source by default, so using it at work is a question for whoever answers licensing questions where you are.

What its author says it does

Copied from the file, not written here

Use to run an autoresearch-style experiment loop — improve a measurable artifact by trying changes, measuring against one objective metric, keeping if better and reverting if not, on an isolated git branch with a logged trail. Trigger on "/experiment", "run an experiment loop", "autoresearch X", "tune/optimize X against a metric", "hill-climb X". Follows references/sops/experiment-loop.md. Enforces the autonomy gate (objective metric + reversible sandbox + no PHI/external) before any unsupervised looping.

SKILL.md

2.2 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it

Experiment loop (autoresearch)

Hill-climb a measurable artifact: try → measure → keep-or-revert → log, on a branch, with a trail. Full procedure: references/sops/experiment-loop.md. Existing examples + use-case cards: experiments/.

First, the autonomy gate

Before looping unsupervised, confirm all three:

  1. Objective, cheap, automatable metric (code computes it in seconds–minutes).
  2. Reversible sandbox (git branch / throwaway data / .tmp).
  3. No PHI, no confidential data, no external send, no prod deploy.

If any fails → human-in-the-loop: propose each change, get approval, no overnight run. Regulated/production outcomes feed the human-reviewed change process — never auto-deploy. This is CLAUDE.md's scale-caution-to-stakes rule.

Run it

  1. Pick or write the experiment's CARD.md (objective, metric+direction, the one mutable surface, budget, autonomy, owner). New ones can copy experiments/forecast-tuning/.
  2. git checkout -b experiments/<tag>.
  3. Baseline run → tools/experiment_log.py add <results.tsv> --id ... --metric ... --status keep --note baseline.
  4. Loop: edit the one mutable surface → run the read-only harness → log → keep (commit) if improved, else git reset. Simpler-and-equal = keep.
  5. Stop on interrupt or the budget. Hand the winner + trail to the human.

Guardrails

  • The eval harness is read-only ground truth — never edit it to game the metric.
  • One mutable surface only (reviewable diffs).
  • Run artifacts (results.tsv, run.log, data/) are git-ignored; the harness + surface + CARD are the tracked blueprint.
  • Don't ship regulated/production changes from the loop.

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 328,083. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.