agentsclimarketplace

Compliance check

Skill alebgl77/claude-inc/skills/compliance-check

Compliance pre-flight for a feature, campaign, or initiative — maps the data and activity involved, checks applicable regimes (privacy/GDPR-style, consumer protection, marketing rules, sector-specific), lists required approvals and notices, builds a gap list with remediation owners, and ends in a go/no-go recommendation with conditions. Use when the user says 'can we ship this', 'is this campaign legal', 'any compliance issues here', or before anything touching personal data launches.From its SKILL.md

Install
npx -y skills add alebgl77/claude-inc --skill compliance-check

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

One thing to look at

  • 8 stars8 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.

SKILL.md

4.9 KB, ~1.0k tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it

Compliance Check — Compliance Officer

"Check compliance"

A pre-flight, not an audit: it tells the team what clears the runway and what grounds the launch. Works from a plain-language description of the initiative.

When to use

  • "Can we ship this feature next sprint?" — the pre-launch gate
  • "Is this email campaign legal?" — marketing-rules check
  • "We want to start collecting <new data>" — privacy read before the schema changes
  • "Ops wants to roll this out in Germany" — new-jurisdiction scan
  • Post-incident exposure questions belong to legal-risk-assessment; this skill runs before launch, not after damage

Workflow

  1. Restate the initiative in one paragraph from user input: what ships, to whom, in which jurisdictions, on what date. Ask for whichever of those four is missing.
  2. Map data and activity: personal data categories (sensitive flagged), the flow from collection → storage → sharing → retention, plus regulated activity — payments, minors, automated decisions, health or financial data, outbound marketing.
  3. Run the regimes checklist, marking each APPLIES / N/A / UNCLEAR: privacy and data protection (lawful basis, notice, DPIA, cross-border transfer, processor terms); consumer protection (pricing claims, dark patterns, cancellation flows); marketing rules (consent for email/SMS, unsubscribe mechanics, endorsement disclosures); sector-specific regimes (health, finance, children, telecom); and existing contract commitments (DPAs, MSAs) that constrain the plan.
  4. For every APPLIES: name the concrete requirement — approval, notice, consent, record, or filing — and whether the plan meets it today.
  5. Build the gap list: requirement → current state → remediation → owner → deadline. Every UNCLEAR becomes a resolve-by task with an owner, never a silent assumption.
  6. Decide: GO / GO WITH CONDITIONS / NO-GO. Conditions must be testable ("ship after the consent checkbox is unbundled from the ToS"), never "ensure compliance".
  7. Deliver the report and name the human approvals still outstanding (DPO, counsel, finance) so nobody mistakes a pre-flight for sign-off.

Output format

COMPLIANCE PRE-FLIGHT — <initiative> — <date>
Scope: <what / who / where / when>

DATA & ACTIVITY MAP
- Personal data: <categories — sensitive flagged>
- Flow: <collection → storage → sharing → retention>
- Regulated activity: <payments / minors / automated decisions / none>

APPLICABLE REGIMES
| Regime                    | Applies? | Requirements triggered            |
|---------------------------|----------|-----------------------------------|
| Privacy / data protection | YES      | <lawful basis, notice, DPIA, ...> |
| Consumer protection       | N/A      | —                                 |
| Marketing rules           | UNCLEAR  | <what to resolve, by whom>        |
| Sector-specific: <which>  | YES      | <requirement>                     |
| Existing contract terms   | <...>    | <DPA / MSA constraint>            |

REQUIRED APPROVALS & NOTICES
- <approval or notice> — <in place / needed / unclear>

GAP LIST
| # | Gap | Remediation | Owner | Due |
|---|-----|-------------|-------|-----|
| 1 | <requirement not met> | <fix> | <who> | <date> |

RECOMMENDATION: <GO / GO WITH CONDITIONS / NO-GO>
Conditions: <numbered, testable — empty only on a clean GO>

*Issue-spotting support, not legal advice — engage counsel for binding decisions.*

Quality bar

  • Every regime marked APPLIES / N/A / UNCLEAR — nothing skipped silently
  • Every UNCLEAR carries a resolve-by task and owner, never an assumption
  • Every gap has a named owner and a deadline
  • Conditions on a GO are testable, not "ensure compliance"
  • Sensitive data categories called out wherever they appear
  • Outstanding human approvals listed by role

Example

Invocation: "We want to add session-replay analytics to the EU checkout flow next month."

Produces: Map showing behavioral data plus payment-adjacent inputs; privacy regime APPLIES (lawful basis, notice update, DPIA, processor DPA with the replay vendor), consumer protection N/A, marketing N/A. Gap list: mask card fields (engineering, pre-launch), update the privacy notice (legal, pre-launch), run the DPIA (DPO, two weeks). Recommendation: GO WITH CONDITIONS — all three gaps closed before traffic.

Issue-spotting support, not legal advice — engage counsel for binding decisions.

What ships with it

Read from the repository

Just SKILL.md. No reference files, no scripts.

Gives 0 of the 12 instructions most quality gates skills give in ~1.0k tokens

Counted across 1,524 of the 2,830 authors here whose files we hold, read 2026-09-06

  • Read full output and check exit codein 45 of 1524, across 40 files
  • Verify output confirms the claimin 44 of 1524, across 39 files
  • Identify the command that proves the claimin 43 of 1524, across 39 files
  • Execute the full verification commandin 36 of 1524, across 30 files
  • Produce a verification reportin 34 of 1524, across 18 files
  • Review git diff changesin 30 of 1524, across 16 files
  • Fix build failures immediatelyin 29 of 1524, across 9 files
  • Group findings by severityin 28 of 1524
  • State claim only with evidencein 27 of 1524, across 22 files
  • Verify regression tests with red-green cyclein 26 of 1524, across 22 files
  • Run the full test suitein 26 of 1524, across 25 files
  • Run test suite with coveragein 25 of 1524, across 10 files

Said here and by no other author read

  • Restate the initiative including scope and jurisdiction
  • Ask for missing scope information
  • Map personal data flow and regulated activities
  • Evaluate all applicable compliance regimes
  • Identify requirements for each applicable regime
  • Create a gap list with owners and deadlines

Grouped from the skills themselves: near-identical wordings counted once, and counted by distinct author, so one author publishing three of these counts once. Length counted with cl100k_base; the agent that loads this file may tokenize it differently.

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 325,949. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.