Check feedback
Outbound sales, autopiloted.
npx -y skills add aitit-inc/leadace --skill check-feedbackAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
2 things to look at
- no licenseNo license file was found in the repository. Code published without one is not open source by default, so using it at work is a question for whoever answers licensing questions where you are.
- 1 stars1 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Surface PMF signals from rejection feedback: feature_gap notes and competitor presence (already_have_solution / competitor_locked). Read-only product reflection, not sales tactics. Triggers: "check feedback", "PMF signals".
SKILL.md
4.6 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
Check Feedback - PMF Signals from Rejection Feedback
A read-only skill that surfaces product/pricing/business-model signals from rejection feedback recorded by /check-responses. Use this for PMF reflection — questions like "is there a missing feature people keep asking for?" or "are we losing to a specific competitor?".
This skill is not for sales tactics. Tactical signals from rejections (when to recontact, who to redirect to, which industries to deprioritize) are consumed automatically by /evaluate in the daily cycle. Do not use /check-feedback to drive operational decisions.
Before starting: Read ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/references/workspace-conventions.md and follow the cross-cutting conventions there (data storage, MCP error handling, document writes, output discipline).
Steps
1. Verify Arguments
- Project ID:
$0(required)
Return an error if $0 is empty.
2. Fetch Two Windows in Parallel
Call mcp__plugin_leadace_api__get_rejection_feedback_summary twice in parallel, both with scope: "pmf":
projectId: "$0",windowDays: 30,scope: "pmf"-> recentprojectId: "$0",scope: "pmf"(nowindowDays) -> all-time
If the tool returns "Project not found", instruct the user to run /leadace first and abort.
With scope: "pmf" the server filters to PMF-relevant reasons only and computes total + percentage within the PMF subset. recontactWindows is returned with all five buckets at {count: 0, samples: []} and decisionMakerPointers is an empty array — those signals are tactical and consumed by /evaluate, not by this skill.
3. Format Report
Render in this order. Always lead with featureGapNotes — that section drives product/roadmap decisions.
a. Feature Gap Notes (PMF signal)
Pull from featureGapNotes (already ordered most-recent-first). For each entry:
- {receivedAt, ISO date} — {organizationName} / {prospectName}
"{freeText}"
If empty in both windows, render: "No feature_gap rejections recorded yet."
b. PMF-Relevant Reason Distribution
Render side-by-side: 30-day vs all-time. With scope: "pmf" the response's primaryReasonDistribution contains only:
feature_gap— concrete missing capability (highest PMF signal)already_have_solution— incumbent vendor presence (competitive pressure)competitor_locked— multi-year contract / renewal-only window (competitive pressure)
count, percentage, and total are all computed within the PMF subset by the server — render them as-is. Skip rows where both windows are 0.
Reason 30 days all-time
feature_gap N (PP%) N (PP%)
already_have_solution N (PP%) N (PP%)
competitor_locked N (PP%) N (PP%)
PMF-relevant total N N
If total is 0 in both windows, render: "No PMF-relevant rejections recorded yet."
4. Closing Note
End with one short, plain-English summary. Decide which line to write in this order — first match wins:
- Thin signal — if
total(from the response) is < 3, say so and recommend continued data collection. Stop. - Capability clustering in
featureGapNotes— scanfeatureGapNotes[].freeTextfor repeated capability/feature terms across entries. If ≥2 notes name the same capability, use the dominant-feature example. - Competitor-pressure share — if
already_have_solution+competitor_lockedtogether exceed half of the PMF-relevant total, use the competitor example. (Free-text is not returned for these reasons, so do not name a specific vendor.) - Otherwise — use the mixed example.
Example tones:
- Dominant feature_gap capability: "Multiple recent rejections cite
<feature>— strongest PMF signal is for that. Consider a strategy revision (refine it via/leadace) or product roadmap input." - High competitor pressure: "A large share of rejections cite an incumbent solution or contract lock-in — competitive pressure is the dominant PMF signal. Consider differentiation messaging (refine the strategy via
/leadace)." - Mixed: "Rejection volume is N over 30 days, no single PMF signal dominates. Continue monitoring."
Do not invent product/strategy actions when the data does not support them.
This is a read-only skill — no DB writes, no side effects.