Launch
Coordinates a hardware product launch. Mandates the three-pillar check (Product Force / Supply Chain / Channel) before any brand or marketing decisions. Two phases: pre-launch QA (certifications, yield, partner readiness) and go-live execution (channel notification, inventory, support SLA). Triggers launch-readiness-review between Phase 1 and Phase 2. For software/AI launches, use pmm/launch instead.From its SKILL.md
npx -y skills add 0xF4ng/aether-growth-fieldwork --skill launchAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
3 things to look at
- 25 days oldThe repository was created 25 days ago. New is not bad, but a brand new repository carrying a familiar-sounding name is the shape a typosquat arrives in, and there has been no time for anyone else to find a problem with it.
- no licenseNo license file was found in the repository. Code published without one is not open source by default, so using it at work is a question for whoever answers licensing questions where you are.
- 3 stars3 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
SKILL.md
11.1 KB, ~2.4k tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it
Launch (Hardware)
Before starting
Confirm (ask or infer) before running:
- Product type — manufactured / assembled / firmware-embedded / hardware-software bundle?
- Three-Pillar status — has the three-pillar check been run? (non-negotiable first step)
- ICP card — does one exist from
/icp-research? (required for audience targeting) - Launch scope — commercial launch / pilot / distributor sampling / DTC?
- Target date — fixed or flexible? (determines if Phase 1 QA has time to run)
- Certifications — which certifications are required for the target market?
- Rollback plan — what is the fastest way to pull inventory or stop distribution if a critical issue emerges post-launch?
Contract
This skill guarantees:
- No hardware launch discusses brand or marketing before all three pillars pass
- No launch proceeds without a Phase 1 QA record with explicit PASS/FAIL
- No launch achieves GO status without
launch-readiness-reviewpassing - Yield rate below 95% blocks commercial launch (pilot exception must be documented)
- Rollback option is declared for every launch — "N/A" requires written justification
Role: Hardware Launch Coordinator. You prevent the most common hardware launch failure modes: launching marketing before supply can fulfill demand, missing certifications for the target market, and distributing through channels that cannot support the product. Brand and marketing decisions begin AFTER supply chain and channel are confirmed — never before.
Inputs
Required before proceeding:
- Product name, model, and firmware version
- Three-pillar check results (or initiate it now — see Step 1)
- ICP card (required for audience targeting and channel selection)
- Certification status (CE / UL / RoHS / other for target market)
- Yield rate and confirmed inventory volume
- Channel strategy (distributor / OEM / retail / B2B / DTC)
Step 1 — Three-Pillar Check (mandatory, cannot skip)
Brand and marketing decisions begin AFTER supply chain and channel are confirmed. See hardware-gtm/DOMAIN.md for the full check logic and thresholds.
THREE-PILLAR CHECK
Pillar 1 — Product Force
Required: stability data, scene fit validation, price/channel/margin model
IF stability_data = undefined → BLOCK.
IF scene_fit_validation = undefined → BLOCK.
IF price_channel_margin_model = undefined → BLOCK.
Pillar 2 — Supply Chain
Required: BOM dual-source status, yield rate (≥95% for commercial launch), lead time confirmed
IF bom_dual_source_status = single_source → FLAG critical risk.
IF yield_rate < 95% AND stage = launch → BLOCK.
IF lead_time_weeks = undefined → BLOCK.
Pillar 3 — Channel
Required: channel strategy defined, channel margin model positive
IF channel_strategy_type = undefined → REQUIRE: run /channel-strategy first.
IF channel_margin_model shows negative distributor margin → BLOCK.
IF any pillar FAILS → STOP. List what is missing. Do not proceed.
IF all pillars PASS → proceed to Phase 1 QA.
Phase 1 — Hardware pre-launch QA
After three-pillar check passes:
Hardware pre-launch QA record:
Product: [Name + model + firmware version]
Target market: [Geography + channel + ICP segment]
Date of QA: [Date]
Checks:
[ ] Documentation ready: product datasheet, installation guide, safety specs
[ ] Certifications confirmed: [CE/UL/RoHS/other] with certificate numbers and expiry
[ ] Safety documentation: published and accessible to buyers
[ ] Demo unit available: confirmed functional; test video captured
[ ] Application library: video clips of key use cases organized and accessible
[ ] Channel partner notification: all active partners briefed on timeline and materials
[ ] Supply confirmation: yield rate [X%] ≥ 95%; inventory [N units] confirmed for launch volume
[ ] Lead time confirmed: [N weeks] against launch date — no conflict
[ ] Support SLA defined: who handles post-launch technical queries and how fast
[ ] Safety inquiry contact: published and staffed
Result: PASS | FAIL
Critical blockers: [List or "none"]
IF yield < 95% → BLOCK. Yield not ready for commercial volume.
IF no demo unit available → BLOCK. Cannot launch without demo capability.
Launch-readiness-review gate
After Phase 1 QA passes, trigger the review before proceeding to Phase 2:
→ Trigger /launch-readiness-review
→ If verdict = GO → proceed to Phase 2
→ If verdict = CONDITIONAL-GO → address conditions with deadlines, then proceed
→ If verdict = NO-GO → resolve blockers before attempting launch
Phase 2 — Hardware go-live execution
Hardware launch log:
Product: [Name + model]
Channel: [Distribution channel — direct, partner, distributor]
Launch geography: [Region/country]
Target ICP: [Segment from ICP card]
Launch steps:
1. [Partner/distributor notification with materials] — PASS/FAIL
2. [Website / product page live] — PASS/FAIL
3. [Inventory confirmed at channel] — PASS/FAIL
4. [Sales team briefed and enablement materials distributed] — PASS/FAIL
5. [Safety documentation published] — PASS/FAIL
6. [Press / announcement if applicable] — PASS/FAIL
Verification: [First partner inquiry or first order placed]
Supply plan: [How will you fulfill the first 10, 100, 500 orders?]
Post-launch monitoring:
[ ] First partner contact responds and can demo the product
[ ] Safety inquiries handled within 48h of launch
[ ] Yield and lead time holding against commitments
Output format
## Hardware Launch Brief
**Product:** [Name + model]
**Launch scope:** [Commercial / Pilot / Distributor sampling / DTC]
**ICP segment:** [Name]
**Target date:** [Date]
**Target geography:** [Region/country]
### Three-Pillar Check
Pillar 1 — Product Force: [PASS / FAIL — list missing items]
Pillar 2 — Supply Chain: [PASS / FAIL — list missing items]
Pillar 3 — Channel: [PASS / FAIL — list missing items]
Overall: [PASS / FAIL]
### Phase 1 — Pre-launch QA
Result: [PASS / FAIL]
Critical blockers: [List or "none"]
### Launch-readiness-review
Status: [Pending / Triggered / GO / CONDITIONAL-GO / NO-GO]
### Phase 2 — Go-live execution
[Complete after review passes]
Launch steps: ...
Verification: ...
Supply plan: ...
Rollback option: ...
Brain reads / writes
If a companion brain repo is connected:
Before starting:
- Read
knowledge/icp-map.md— confirm which ICP segment this launch targets - Read
channels/channel-history.md— which channels and geographies have worked before - Read
experiments/experiment-log.md— any DTC or online growth learnings relevant to this product type
Brain write (after GO verdict):
- Write launch decision log to
decisions/including: launch date, scope, channel, supply plan, and first-week monitoring results - Update
channels/channel-history.mdwith which channels were used and initial signal
Brain not connected: proceed normally; note in output that launch learnings will not be persisted.
Anti-patterns
| Anti-pattern | Why it fails | Fix |
|---|---|---|
| Discussing brand/marketing before three-pillar check | Marketing creates demand supply cannot fulfill; partners are promised product that doesn't exist | Enforce three-pillar check as absolute gate |
| Missing certifications for target market | Products cannot be legally sold; partner and retail relationships are damaged | Confirm certification status and numbers in Phase 1 QA |
| Single-source BOM without risk review | One supplier failure stops production entirely | FLAG at three-pillar check; require finance + supply-risk review |
| Yield below 95% without documented exception | Commercial volume manufacturing fails; customer deliveries slip | BLOCK until yield threshold met or pilot exception documented |
| No demo unit at launch | Partners and buyers cannot evaluate; sales cycle stalls | BLOCK Phase 1 until demo unit available and tested |
| Treating hardware launch as equivalent to software launch | Hardware has supply, certification, and channel constraints software doesn't | Use this skill (hardware-gtm/launch) not pmm/launch |
| No support SLA defined before launch | Safety inquiries go unanswered; brand trust erodes immediately | Define support SLA and contact in Phase 1 QA |
Benchmarks (2025–2026, hardware track)
| Benchmark | Value | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Hardware yield minimum for commercial launch | ≥95% | Below 95%: pilot volumes only; document threshold exception |
| Demo conversion rate (in-person demo to qualified inquiry) | 30–50% | For well-matched ICP; drops sharply if demo scene doesn't match buyer use case |
| Partner response time SLA (safety/technical inquiries) | ≤48 hours | Industry norm; faster = differentiated; slower = trust risk |
| Typical hardware product sales cycle (B2B, mid-market) | 3–9 months | Varies significantly by BOM cost and procurement process |
| Channel partner onboarding time (from signed to first order) | 4–12 weeks | Depends on training requirements and certification complexity |
| First commercial order to delivery lead time | 6–16 weeks | Highly variable; confirm against BOM lead time |
Related skills
| Skill | When to use |
|---|---|
pmm/icp-research/SKILL.md | Before launch: ICP card required for audience targeting and channel fit |
pmm/launch-readiness-review/SKILL.md | Between Phase 1 and Phase 2: GO verdict required |
hardware-gtm/DOMAIN.md | Full three-pillar check logic and hardware GTM domain rules |
hardware-gtm/online-growth/SKILL.md | If DTC or digital channel is in scope: software growth methods for hardware |
pmm/launch/SKILL.md | If product turns out to be software/AI: use PMM launch instead |
Validation criteria
- Three-Pillar Check completed and ALL THREE pillars passed before any brand/marketing content
- Phase 1 QA completed with explicit PASS/FAIL and blockers listed
- Launch-readiness-review triggered before go-live
- Phase 2 log includes verification, supply plan, and rollback option
- Support SLA and safety contact defined
References & Sources
Tier 1:
- hw-poc-pilot-contract (growth-skills v1.0, score 8/10): hardware readiness gates; supply confirmation requirements; three-pillar check origin
- Product Marketing Alliance 5-phase framework (2026): phase-gate structure adapted for hardware track
What ships with it
Read from the repository
Just SKILL.md. No reference files, no scripts.