Crypto report writer

crypto-report-writer

Final reporting skill for the crypto audit framework.

When to Use

• A finding has passed crypto-fp-check and needs report-ready prose
• You need a consistent report section structure across multiple findings
• You are summarizing severity and test evidence for an audit deliverable
• You are drafting disclosed writeups that may later map into zkbugs-index

When NOT to Use

• The finding is still hypothesis-shaped or missing verification evidence
• You are still building protocol context or running domain-specific review
• You need to decide severity before the evidence is assembled

Workflow

Choose the report variant first, then fill it with verified evidence only:

• templates/client-report-template.md for client-facing delivery with concise executive and remediation language
• templates/internal-report-template.md for engineering/internal circulation with investigation notes and rollout risk
• templates/public-disclosure-template.md for external publication without private client context
• templates/report-template.md for generic/default findings when no specialized variant is required

Do not write around missing proof or test gaps; state them explicitly.

Reference Use

• Use audit-common for shared severity and finding-structure rules
• Use crypto-fp-check output as the source of truth for verified claims
• Cite zkbugs-index only when the referenced entry is disclosed and citable

Output Contract

Produce a report-ready finding package that includes:

• Final severity and short title
• Summary, root cause, impact, and remediation
• Test evidence status, including PoC status where required
• Whether the writeup is suitable for external citation or index ingestion