Audit unit

Audit a Unit

Review an existing unit for common issues: missing dependencies, incorrect license, unnecessary build dependencies, suboptimal configure flags, missing sub-package splits, and deviation from project conventions.

Workflow

Step 1: Read the Unit

Find and read the unit's .star file:

Glob: modules/**/units/**/<name>.star

Step 2: Cross-Reference with Other Distributions

Check how Alpine, Yocto, and Buildroot package the same software. Compare:

• Dependencies — are any build or runtime deps missing? Are any listed deps unnecessary?
• Configure flags — are there important flags that other distros use that this unit is missing? Are there flags enabled here that are unusual?
• Patches — do other distros carry patches that might be needed here?
• License — does the SPDX identifier match what other distros declare?

Step 3: Check Dependencies

Verify the unit's dependency lists:

• Missing build deps — if configure.ac or CMakeLists.txt requires a library via pkg-config or find_package, it should be in deps.
• Missing runtime deps — if the built binary links against a shared library, that library's unit should be in runtime_deps.
• Dep has no unit — every dependency must be built from source as a unit. If a dep is listed but has no corresponding .star unit file, flag it. If a dep is satisfied only because it happens to be in the container's base image (Alpine artifacts), that is a bug — it needs its own unit. Never rely on apk add in the Dockerfile for library dependencies.
• Unnecessary deps — check if any listed deps are actually unused by the build.
• Circular deps — verify no dependency cycles exist via yoe graph.
• Machine-flavored dep in a generic unit — flag as a warning if a generic library or tool depends on a unit that varies by machine (anything with provides set, or a unit reachable only via MACHINE_CONFIG). It forks the generic unit's apk per machine. Generic units' deps should be other generic libraries/tools only.

Step 3b: Check provides usage

provides is a []string of virtual package names. If the unit sets it, check that it's appropriate:

• provides is reserved for leaf artifacts that get swapped per machine or project: kernel, base-files, init, bootloader. Flag as a warning if a build-time library, a generic tool, or a daemon with a busybox alternative declares provides — every transitive consumer's apk forks per swap.
• For runtime alternatives (mdev/eudev, udhcpc/dhcpcd, busybox-ntpd/ntp-client), recommend installing both side-by-side and selecting which daemon runs from the init script in a config unit instead of using provides.
• See docs/naming-and-resolution.md §"When NOT to use provides" for details.

Step 3c: Check replaces usage

replaces is a []string of package names whose files this unit may overwrite at install time. Verify:

• The unit only sets replaces if it actually ships a file path that another package also claims. Flag as a warning if replaces is set but no shadowed paths can be identified — likely a copy-paste from another unit.
• The replaced package(s) are real units in the project (busybox, ncurses, etc.). Typos silently degrade to "no shadow declared" and apk will fail the install.
• The shadow direction is correct: if pkg A overwrites pkg B's files, A declares replaces = ["B"], not the other way around.

To check linked libraries after a successful build:

# Inside the container, check what the built binaries link against. The build
# tree is segmented by distro: build/<distro>/<unit>/ (e.g. build/alpine/...,
# build/debian/...), and <unit> carries its arch suffix.
find build/<distro>/<unit>/destdir -type f -executable | head -5

Step 3d: Check for per-distro / per-machine build forks

yoe's rule is one unit, one artifact; resolve variation at runtime. A unit should produce a single binary that every project and machine shares.

• Flag as a warning any field that forks the build by machine or project (per-machine configure_args, per-project flags) where a runtime mechanism would do — an init script that detects what's installed, a conditional config file, a replaces: annotation. Forking multiplies the cache surface and breaks binary reuse.
• Building twice along the distro axis is expected, not a fork. A source unit consumed by both an Alpine (musl) image and a Debian (glibc) image necessarily builds once per libc — musl- and glibc-linked binaries cannot share at the ABI level. That is the one legitimate split; do not flag it.
• If the same package is also pulled from an Alpine feed for some images (via prefer_modules) while built from source for others, confirm that is intentional (usually to get a shared-library soversion Alpine ships) rather than an accident.

Step 4: Check Build Configuration

Review configure flags and build steps:

• Security flags — for network-facing software, ensure TLS/crypto is enabled and linked against openssl (not a bundled copy).
• Unnecessary features — for embedded targets, disable features that add bloat (e.g., GUI support, test suites, documentation generation).
• Hardcoded paths — build commands should use $PREFIX, $DESTDIR, $NPROC, not hardcoded values.
• Parallel build — verify make -j$NPROC is used (the classes handle this, but custom build steps might not).

Step 5: Check Metadata

Verify unit metadata:

• license — must be a valid SPDX identifier. Cross-check against the upstream LICENSE/COPYING file.
• description — should be a clear, concise one-liner.
• version — check if a newer stable version exists upstream.
• source — prefer git URLs over tarballs. If using git, verify tag matches the version.

Step 6: Check for Known Issues

• Version staleness — is the unit significantly behind upstream? Note any known CVEs in the current version.
• Patch applicability — if patches exist, are they still needed or have they been merged upstream?
• Build reproducibility — are there any non-deterministic elements (embedded timestamps, random ordering)?

Step 7: Report Findings

Present findings organized by severity:

Errors (must fix):

• Missing runtime dependencies (will cause runtime failures)
• Incorrect license
• Security issues (e.g., using bundled crypto instead of system openssl)

Warnings (should fix):

• Missing build dependencies (build may work by accident via sysroot)
• Stale version with known CVEs
• Suboptimal configure flags

Suggestions (nice to have):

• Version bump available
• Patches that could be dropped
• Configure flags to reduce image size

For each finding, explain what the issue is, why it matters, and how to fix it.

What NOT to Do

• Do not modify the unit during an audit — only report findings. The user decides what to fix.
• Do not flag style issues that match existing project conventions (e.g., if all units omit description periods, don't flag that).
• Do not recommend changes without checking how other distributions handle the same package — there may be good reasons for the current configuration.
• Do not recommend installing missing dependencies in the Dockerfile — every library and build tool must be a unit built from source.