Audit ux laws

Audit UX Laws

Self-contained reference for the 30 Laws of UX (based on lawsofux.com by Jon Yablonski), tuned for an agent to find the relevant law, apply it to real code, and flag violations by severity. No live fetch — all law content is bundled in references/.

This skill does two jobs: proactive design (pick the right law while building UI) and review (audit an interface and report violations as CRITICAL / MINOR with concrete fixes). It works on UI only — components, layouts, navigation, forms, interactions, perceived performance. It is not a visual/CSS-correctness pass and it does not redesign brand or content.

The agent owns one decision: which laws are relevant to the thing in front of me? Everything downstream — the takeaway, the code pattern, the severity threshold — lives in the routed reference file. Read the router, open the one category file you need, apply it.

When to Use

Trigger on phrases and contexts like:

• "is this good UX?", "review this interface", "what's wrong with this design?"
• building or editing components, pages, layouts, navigation, menus, dropdowns, forms
• "too many options", "this feels overwhelming", decision points, pricing tiers
• touch-target sizing, click areas, spacing, visual grouping, hierarchy, what stands out
• loading states, response time, perceived performance, animation timing
• any named law: Fitts's, Hick's, Miller's, Jakob's, Doherty Threshold, Gestalt, Von Restorff, choice overload, chunking, cognitive load, Tesler's, Postel's, Pareto, Occam's, Zeigarnik, peak-end, goal-gradient, serial position

Do NOT use when

• The work is backend / API / data-layer with no user-facing surface.
• The ask is pure visual polish (exact colors, shadows, brand) — that is a CSS/design-system pass.
• You need a full persona-driven usability audit with saved findings → use audit-ux-and-save-files.
• You need a visual UI bug audit across pages with screenshots → use audit-ui-and-save-files.

Step 1 — Route the symptom to a law

Match what you see to a row; open only the reference file in the last column.

What you're checking	Laws	Reference file
Too many options (menus, dropdowns, nav, plans)	Hick's Law, Choice Overload	references/heuristics.md
Touch targets too small / far apart / hard to hit	Fitts's Law	references/heuristics.md
Beautiful-but-is-it-usable / first-impression trust	Aesthetic-Usability Effect	references/heuristics.md
Too much info on screen / dense forms / long lists	Miller's Law, Cognitive Load, Chunking, Working Memory	references/cognitive.md
What stands out / CTA emphasis / scanning order	Von Restorff, Serial Position, Selective Attention	references/cognitive.md
Onboarding / first-time users skip instructions	Paradox of the Active User, Cognitive Bias, Flow	references/cognitive.md
Grouping / spacing / layout relationships	Proximity, Similarity, Common Region, Uniform Connectedness, Prägnanz	references/gestalt.md
Users confused by an unfamiliar pattern	Jakob's Law, Mental Model	references/gestalt.md (Mental Model), references/principles.md (Jakob's)
Response time / loading / perceived speed	Doherty Threshold	references/principles.md
Forms too long / complexity	Tesler's Law, Parkinson's Law, Occam's Razor, Pareto	references/principles.md
Input handling / error tolerance	Postel's Law	references/principles.md
Motivation / progress / completion / memorable ending	Goal-Gradient, Zeigarnik, Peak-End Rule	references/principles.md

If more than one row matches, open each named file once and apply every relevant law.

Step 2 — Apply or review

Designing (proactive): read the law's Key Takeaways + Frontend Code Implications, then build to them.

Reviewing (audit): walk the law's Review Criteria, classify each violation, and report it with the fix. Severity scale:

• CRITICAL — breaks usability, accessibility, or trust. Fix before ship. (e.g. touch target <44×44px mobile; >7 ungrouped options; primary CTA indistinguishable from secondary; no loading feedback >400ms; required cross-screen memorization.)
• MINOR — polish / optimization. (e.g. >6 colors, inconsistent spacing, missing smart default, no progress indicator, suboptimal CTA placement.)

Always connect the finding to the why (the psychological principle) and give a concrete, actionable fix — code pattern or specific change, never "improve the UX."

Step 3 — Follow Related links when warranted

Each law entry ends with Related pointers (e.g. Choice Overload → Hick's Law → Doherty Threshold). Follow them only when the current law's fix creates a new question the related law answers.

Quick Reference — all 30 laws

Law	Category	One-liner	Related
Aesthetic-Usability Effect	Heuristic	Beautiful design is perceived as more usable	Von Restorff, Jakob's
Choice Overload	Heuristic	Too many options cause decision paralysis	Hick's, Doherty
Fitts's Law	Heuristic	Larger, closer targets are faster to hit	Doherty, Choice Overload
Hick's Law	Heuristic	Decision time grows with number of choices	Choice Overload, Miller's
Chunking	Cognitive	Group info into meaningful units	Miller's, Cognitive Load
Cognitive Bias	Cognitive	Systematic thinking errors shape decisions	Selective Attention, Peak-End
Cognitive Load	Cognitive	Minimize mental effort to use the interface	Miller's, Tesler's
Miller's Law	Cognitive	Working memory holds ~7±2 items	Chunking, Working Memory
Working Memory	Cognitive	Don't force recall across steps/screens	Miller's, Chunking
Selective Attention	Cognitive	Users filter to goal-relevant stimuli	Von Restorff, Cognitive Bias
Serial Position Effect	Cognitive	First and last items remembered best	Von Restorff, Peak-End
Von Restorff Effect	Cognitive	The distinct item stands out — use for CTAs	Serial Position, Selective Attention
Flow	Cognitive	Balance challenge & skill; remove friction	Doherty, Goal-Gradient
Paradox of the Active User	Cognitive	Users skip manuals and learn by doing	Jakob's, Mental Model
Law of Proximity	Gestalt	Near elements are perceived as grouped	Common Region, Similarity
Law of Similarity	Gestalt	Similar-looking elements are seen as related	Proximity, Uniform Connectedness
Law of Common Region	Gestalt	A shared boundary groups elements	Proximity, Uniform Connectedness
Law of Uniform Connectedness	Gestalt	Visually connected elements are most related	Common Region, Similarity
Law of Prägnanz	Gestalt	Users read complex shapes in their simplest form	Occam's, Similarity
Mental Model	Gestalt	Users carry prebuilt expectations from other products	Jakob's, Paradox of Active User
Jakob's Law	Principle	Users expect your site to work like the others they know	Mental Model, Prägnanz
Doherty Threshold	Principle	Keep response <400ms to hold attention & flow	Flow, Fitts's
Goal-Gradient Effect	Principle	Motivation rises as the goal nears — show progress	Zeigarnik, Flow
Zeigarnik Effect	Principle	Incomplete tasks are remembered — use progress cues	Goal-Gradient, Peak-End
Peak-End Rule	Principle	Experiences are judged by their peak and ending	Serial Position, Zeigarnik
Postel's Law	Principle	Be liberal in what you accept, strict in what you output	Jakob's, Tesler's
Tesler's Law	Principle	Irreducible complexity must live in design, not the user	Cognitive Load, Occam's
Occam's Razor	Principle	Remove elements until you can't without breaking function	Tesler's, Prägnanz, Pareto
Pareto Principle	Principle	~80% of effects come from ~20% of causes	Occam's, Tesler's
Parkinson's Law	Principle	Work expands to fill available time/space — constrain it	Doherty, Goal-Gradient

Reference routing

Load only the file for the category you routed to in Step 1.

File	Read when
references/heuristics.md	Decision time, target acquisition, choice volume, aesthetic trust.
references/cognitive.md	Memory limits, attention, scanning, learning, biases.
references/gestalt.md	Visual grouping, layout relationships, shape simplification, expectations.
references/principles.md	Trade-offs, simplicity, response time, input handling, motivation, conventions.

Guardrails

• Self-contained: never fetch lawsofux.com at runtime; bundled references are the source of truth.
• Don't load all four category files for every request — route, then apply only what's relevant.
• Every review finding needs a severity (CRITICAL/MINOR), a why (the law), and a concrete fix.
• Don't invent thresholds; use the numbers in the reference files.
• Severity numbers are usability heuristics, not a substitute for WCAG accessibility testing.