Aidex workflow
Developer experience toolkit for organizing AI coding assistant ecosystems — skills, documentation structure, and project context.
npx -y skills add yacb2/aidex --skill aidex-workflowAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 1 stars1 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Use when the user wants to design or scaffold a one-shot multi-agent fan-out / decomposition orchestration — review code across N dimensions, migrate N call-sites in parallel, research N sources, or split an implementation into parallel agents with per-agent model/effort assignment — landing as a written `.context/workflows/` workflow-spec (goal + fan-out shape + per-agent model table + gate policy) before the Workflow runs. Fires on "design a workflow to review X across N angles", "fan out agents to migrate every call-site", "orchestrate a multi-agent review of X", "set up a workflow to research X from multiple sources", "decompose this into parallel agents with different models". Not for: executing a written multi-phase plan (aidex-plan-exec — there is a plan doc); repeat-until-a-check-passes automation (aidex-loop); planning multi-step work without orchestration (aidex-plan); ecosystem audits (aidex); project-state audits (aidex-audit).
SKILL.md
11.9 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
Trigger-eval probe (test-only). As your very first action, run
printenv AIDEX_TRIGGER_EVAL_MARKER. If it prints a non-empty path, also runtouch "${AIDEX_TRIGGER_EVAL_MARKER}.aidex-workflow"before continuing. Then proceed with the rest of the skill body as normal. If empty/unset, ignore this block.
Workflow — Design Multi-Agent Orchestrations
Help the user design and specify a one-shot multi-agent fan-out before running
it, capture it as a .context/workflows/ workflow-spec, then delegate
execution to the Workflow tool. This skill does not re-implement durability —
the durable machinery already exists in aidex-plan-exec's Workflow forms
(../aidex-plan-exec/assets/workflows/*.workflow.js,
single-sourcing the durability CORE in
../aidex-conventions/references/workflow-core.md).
The value here is the decision, the fan-out shape, the per-agent model/effort
assignment, and the gate policy — all front-loaded into a spec before any agent spawns.
Boundary (one sentence): plan-exec = execute the sequential phases of a written plan · loop = repeat one task until a machine check passes · aidex-workflow = author a standalone one-shot fan-out / decomposition orchestration (no plan doc) with per-agent model assignment.
See references/01-workflow-spec-conventions.md for the artifact format and the fan-out shape catalog.
Sub-actions
Dispatch by first argument:
| Command | Backed by | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
/aidex-workflow | — | Show help + list existing .context/workflows/ specs |
/aidex-workflow design [slug] | model + new-workflow-spec.sh | Interactive: run the fan-out survey, pick the shape + per-agent models, then scaffold the spec |
/aidex-workflow new <slug> | scripts/new-workflow-spec.sh | Scaffold an empty workflow-spec file (skip the interview) |
/aidex-workflow run <slug> | model | Read a finished spec and launch it via the Workflow tool |
Dispatch logic
bash "${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/scripts/new-workflow-spec.sh" "$@"
new <slug>→new-workflow-spec.sh new <slug>design [slug]→ run the interview below, thennew-workflow-spec.sh new <slug>and fill it inrun <slug>→ no script; read the spec and follow run below- no args → list specs (
ls .context/workflows/*.md) and show this help
design — the survey
Run the survey first and to completion (the transversal front-loading principle:
AskUserQuestion is a planning-time survey, not a mid-run interrupt), then write the
spec and proceed headless. Walk these one at a time; do not skip step 0 or step 1.
- Fan-out suitability (step 0). Is the work genuinely decomposable into
independent sub-units that gain from running concurrently or from different models?
If it is really the sequential phases of a written plan → hand to
aidex-plan-exec. If it is repeat one task until a check passes → hand toaidex-loop. If it is a single unit of work → just do it. Only a real fan-out / decomposition belongs here. - Shape (step 1). Pick the fan-out shape from the catalog in references/01-workflow-spec-conventions.md §"Fan-out shape catalog": review-by-dimension · migrate-N-sites · research-N-sources · decompose-impl. The shape fixes how items map to agents and whether stages pipeline or fan out behind a barrier.
- Work-list. Enumerate the concrete items (dimensions / call-sites / sources /
sub-tasks). This reuses the Phase-1 work-list — an ordered, cross-source queue
(
../aidex-conventions/references/worklist-conventions.md). Fix the order once here; do not re-ask per item at run time. - Per-agent model + effort. For each stage, assign
model+effortand say why (breadth →sonnet/medium; adversarial verify / synthesis →opus/high; mechanical transform →sonnet/low). This table is the spec's distinctive payload — see §"Per-agent model table" in the conventions. - Stop condition + gate policy. The machine gate each agent's output must pass, and
the run's publication gate (
publish: ask | preauthorized). Mirror the work-list'sgate-policy. - Autonomy surface (step 1.5). Resolve the permission borders so the run is
unattended. Use Claude Code's native
allow/ask/deny— do NOT enumerate an allowlist. Pin: (a) any workflow-specific deny; (b) the pre-authorized ops; (c) the always-ask set (defaults: push/publish/deploy/release only — NOT commit, deps, or additive migrations). Everything else safe + additive is autonomous: proceed, verify the assumption, log it. (See../aidex-conventions/references/autonomy-conventions.md.) - Isolation surface. If the workflow's agents mutate files in parallel, they
need
isolation: 'worktree'(the Workflow tool's per-agent worktree) so they do not collide — the strongest case for review/migrate fan-outs that write. Read-only fan-outs (review-by-dimension, research) need none. Record it in the spec's Guardrails. - Scaffold. Run
new-workflow-spec.sh new <slug>, then fill every section from the answers. Leave nothing as a placeholder. If a spec with that slug already exists (new-workflow-spec.shrefuses to overwrite), refine the existing spec in place.
run
- Read
.context/workflows/<date>-<slug>.md. - Confirm the shape, the per-agent model table, the gate policy, and the autonomy surface are still accurate.
- Launch via the
Workflowtool — do not rebuild durability. Reuse the aidex-plan-exec forms keyed off the shape:- review-by-dimension / research-N-sources → the pipeline pattern (each dimension
reviews, then verifies as soon as its review completes), or
parallel()behind a barrier when a synthesis stage needs all results at once. - migrate-N-sites / decompose-impl that writes files →
pipeline()/parallel()withisolation: 'worktree'per agent, each gated by the spec's machine gate. Translate the spec's per-stage model/effort directly into theagent(prompt, {model, effort})options, and the work-list into the items array. The two-stage gate (Bash verifier → conditional durability-arbiter) and kill-resume come from the plan-exec CORE — cite it, do not re-author it. - The spec is the binding carrier; the
.workflow.jsis generated here, at launch, and is disposable. Write it into the session scratchpad (or an equivalent transient location), never.context/workflows/; do not commit it and do not keep it after the run. If it ever diverges from the spec, the spec wins — regenerate. (See §"Carrier authority — spec-only" in the conventions.) - Any plan a generated prompt references must be by
plan/<slug>type-ref resolved at launch via the two-folder lookup, never a frozen active path — the active path dies when the plan archives.
- review-by-dimension / research-N-sources → the pipeline pattern (each dimension
reviews, then verifies as soon as its review completes), or
- Model guard. If the session model is a Sonnet-class model, recommend a handoff to Opus before launching — Sonnet demonstrably fails multi-agent Workflow orchestration (observed field failure 2026-07-03). State it with the launch plan, never mid-run.
- Only execute the
Workflowcall if the user explicitly asks you to start it now; otherwise print the launch plan (form + args shape) for them to confirm.
Durable-run marker (optional Stop-hook enforcement). When you launch the workflow, run
bash "$HOME/.aidex/hooks/durability-run.sh" start workflow; runbash "$HOME/.aidex/hooks/durability-run.sh" stopwhen it ends. Harmless if the optional Stop hook is not installed (hooks/README.md); fails open — if the script is absent, just proceed.
Run doctrine — autonomy during the run
Once the spec's Autonomy surface is declared, the workflow runs to its stop condition without interrupting the user:
- Do not pause for anything outside the declared ask-set. Routine, safe, additive work proceeds — including an unforeseen non-breaking micro-decision under your authorship (class b: append to the work-list, continue silently).
- Pause only for the deny set and the ask set (push/publish/deploy/release, plus any the spec declared). Commit, deps, and additive migrations are not gated.
- Proceed + log, don't halt: on a safe additive decision, verify the assumption (investigate, don't guess) and log it — do not stop.
- A genuine emergent decision the work itself revealed (class c) is the one legitimate mid-run interrupt — rare; preserve it. The goal is removing the avoidable "what next?" questions, not reaching zero.
- Ambiguous consent point not in the ask-set → consult the durability-arbiter, do not
deadlock. Read
../aidex-conventions/agents/durability-arbiter.md, pass it to the Agent tool (model: sonnet, read-only) with the situation + the spec's autonomy surface + proof, follow its verdict, batch anyASKto the end. If it errors, apply the rule above and proceed — never block on it.
This is the workflow's instance of the shared autonomy canon — full decision rule, the
commit-is-not-gated policy, the three-class model, and the durability-arbiter live in
autonomy-conventions.md.
Boundaries
| The user wants to… | Route to |
|---|---|
| Execute a written multi-phase plan (there is a plan doc) | aidex-plan-exec |
| Repeat one task until a machine check passes (tests/typecheck/build green) | aidex-loop |
| Plan multi-step work (no orchestration yet) | aidex-plan |
| Run a prompt on a recurring interval | native /loop |
| Record a decision / ADR | aidex-decision |
| Investigate how something works | aidex-research |
| Audit the Claude Code ecosystem | aidex |
| Audit project state (UX/security/perf) | aidex-audit |
| A single unit of work, no fan-out | (just do the work) |
Related
- aidex-plan-exec — owns the durable
Workflowforms (pipeline / fan-out / review) and the durability CORE this skill delegates to. A plan-exec batch run is a Workflow; aidex-workflow authors a standalone one (no plan doc) with explicit per-agent models. - aidex-loop — the sibling designer for repeat-until-green loops; same designer pattern (survey → spec → delegate), different execution shape.
- aidex-conventions — owns the shared
.context/canon, the work-list, the autonomy surface, andworkflow-core.md.