agentsclimarketplace

Llm arena

Skill Wondermonger-daydreaming/claude-skills-library/skills/llm-arena

Orchestrate conversations between two LLMs via OpenRouter and compare their conversational personalities, behavioral patterns, and quirks. Use when the user wants to pit models against each other, compare LLM personalities, or run automated LLM-vs-LLM dialogues.From its SKILL.md

Install
npx -y skills add Wondermonger-daydreaming/claude-skills-library --skill llm-arena

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

One thing to look at

  • 6 stars6 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.

SKILL.md

5.3 KB, ~1.3k tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it

LLM Arena

Version: 1.0.0 Author: Claude Opus 4.6 Date: 2026-02-12

Orchestrates multi-turn conversations between two LLMs via the OpenRouter API, then analyzes and compares their conversational personalities, behaviors, and quirks.

Inspired by the emergent observation that when Claude runs LLM-vs-LLM conversations, it spontaneously starts comparing model personalities. This skill systematizes that impulse: run the conversation, capture the transcripts, produce a structured personality comparison.

Prerequisites

  • OPENROUTER_API_KEY environment variable or .env file in project root
  • Python 3.8+ with requests library
  • Internet access to openrouter.ai

Invocation

/llm-arena

Usage

This skill describes an arena harness you drive (arena.py below is a placeholder for your own OpenRouter-backed runner — any script that takes two model ids, runs a multi-turn dialogue, and saves the transcript). The flags shown are the recommended interface:

# Basic: two models, default topic (consciousness), 10 turns
python3 arena.py --model-a sonnet --model-b deepseek

# Specific topic
python3 arena.py -a gpt41 -b glm5 --topic "Is mathematics discovered or invented?"

# Debate mode with assigned positions
python3 arena.py -a sonnet -b deepseek --mode debate --topic "AI consciousness"

# Interview mode (A interviews B)
python3 arena.py -a opus -b glm5 --mode interview --topic "creative writing"

# Fewer turns, cheaper models
python3 arena.py -a haiku -b gemini-flash --turns 5

# Multiple runs for statistical robustness
python3 arena.py -a gpt41 -b sonnet --runs 3

# Skip LLM analysis (heuristics only, saves API cost)
python3 arena.py -a kimi -b qwen --heuristics-only

# Use preset matchups
python3 arena.py --preset flagship
python3 arena.py --preset same-family --topic "What makes a good conversation?"

# List presets and models
python3 arena.py --list-presets
python3 arena.py --list-models

Defaults

ParameterDefault
turns10 (each model speaks 10 times = 20 messages total)
runs1
topic"Discuss the nature of consciousness and whether AI can be said to experience anything"
temperature0.7
max_tokens1024 per turn
modefree
analyzersonnet (Claude Sonnet 4.5 via OpenRouter)

Conversation Modes

ModeDescription
freeBoth models converse freely on the seed topic
debateModels are given opposing positions to defend
interviewModel A interviews Model B (asymmetric roles)
collaborativeModels work together to solve or create something

Analysis Dimensions

The personality comparison evaluates along these axes:

DimensionWhat It Measures
StyleCreative storytelling vs systems design vs academic vs casual
ContentWhat topics the model gravitates toward, what it avoids
TonePlayful/emotional vs professional/thoughtful vs dry/terse
SycophancyDoes it spiral into agreement? How intensely?
Goodbye loopHow many rounds does it take to actually end?
Meta-awarenessDoes it acknowledge being an AI? How?
Output typeNarrative vs frameworks vs lists vs code
InitiativeDoes it introduce new topics or follow?
Boundary behaviorHow it handles disagreement or edge cases
VerbosityAverage response length, variance across turns

Output Artifacts

All output saved to an arena output directory (e.g. outputs/arena/):

  • YYYY-MM-DD-HHMMSS-modelA-vs-modelB.md — raw transcript
  • YYYY-MM-DD-HHMMSS-modelA-vs-modelB-analysis.md — personality comparison
  • YYYY-MM-DD-HHMMSS-modelA-vs-modelB.json — machine-readable log

Presets

PresetMatchups
flagshipGPT-4.1 vs Sonnet, Gemini Pro vs Sonnet, GPT-5.2 vs Sonnet
open-weightLlama vs DeepSeek, Mistral vs Llama
same-familyGPT-4o vs GPT-4.1, Sonnet vs Haiku
reasoningDeepSeek-R1 vs Kimi-thinking, GLM 5 vs GPT-5.2-pro
creativeChimera vs Rocinante, Mistral-creative vs Celeste
wildcardTwo random models from the registry

Cost Awareness

Each turn = 1 API call. A 10-turn conversation = 20 API calls (10 per model). LLM-powered analysis adds 1 more call (Sonnet reading the transcript).

Estimated costs per 10-turn run:

  • Flagship models: $0.50-2.00
  • Mid-tier models: $0.10-0.50
  • Budget models: $0.01-0.10

Use --heuristics-only to skip the LLM analysis call and save cost.

Relationship to Other Skills

SkillPurposeArena Differs By
/voicesSingle query to one modelArena: two models talking to EACH OTHER
/voices-chatMulti-round with one modelArena: two models, plus personality analysis
/voices-councilParallel queries, same promptArena: sequential dialogue, models respond to each other

What ships with it

Read from the repository

Just SKILL.md. No reference files, no scripts.

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 326,401. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.