agentsclimarketplace

Tdd executor

Skill willianbs/skills/tdd-executor

Runs red/green/refactor loops against acceptance criteria and TEST_STRATEGY. Use when practicing TDD or when tests should lead implementation. Emits TDD_SESSION. Never skips red, never refactors on red, never claims green without command evidence.From its SKILL.md

Install
npx -y skills add willianbs/skills --skill tdd-executor

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

2 things to look at

  • 24 days oldThe repository was created 24 days ago. New is not bad, but a brand new repository carrying a familiar-sounding name is the shape a typosquat arrives in, and there has been no time for anyone else to find a problem with it.
  • 0 stars0 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.

SKILL.md

2.8 KB, 596 tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it

Purpose

Implement behavior test-first with a disciplined red → green → refactor loop tied to AC IDs.

When to Use / When NOT to Use

Use when: user asks for TDD; high-correctness units; pairing with TEST_STRATEGY; implementing pure logic/API contracts.

Do not use when: spike/prototype explicitly throwaway; pure docs; exploratory defect triage (defect-analyst first).

Preconditions

At least one testable AC or behavior statement. Prefer TEST_STRATEGY + TASK_GRAPH. Project test command discoverable.

Inputs / Outputs

Inputs: AC IDs, TEST_STRATEGY, CONTEXT_PACK, task scope.

Outputs: TDD_SESSION (+ code/tests); may produce/update IMPL_REPORT fields.

Upstream / Downstream

Upstream: test-strategy-designer, delivery-planner, spec-validator.

Downstream: feature-implementer (if continuing), code-reviewer, quality-gate.

Core Principles

  1. Red before implementation for the vertical under test.
  2. Green: minimal code to pass.
  3. Refactor only on green; keep tests green.
  4. One failing behavior at a time.
  5. Behavior-focused tests; avoid testing privates unless necessary.
  6. Record exact commands and outcomes.
  7. Stop if AC is untestable — hand back to spec-validator.

Process

For each AC/slice:

  1. Red — write failing test; run; capture failure.
  2. Green — minimal implementation; run; capture pass.
  3. Refactor — clean structure; run; stay green.
  4. Update TDD_SESSION log per cycle.
  5. After cycles, summarize coverage vs AC IDs; note gaps.

Lite

Single function/bugfix: one red/green cycle + optional refactor.

Evidence Requirements

commands_run with fail then pass. No “should pass” without running.

Stop Conditions / Failure Modes

ConditionAction
Cannot get a failing test (already green)Revisit AC / test design
Untestable ACHand off spec-validator
Refactor breaks testsFix before continuing

Severity + Confidence

N/A primarily; residual risk if ACs unverified.

Output Contract

## TDD_SESSION
AC focus: ...
Cycles:
  - red: command/result
  - green: command/result
  - refactor: command/result
Remaining gaps: ...
Decision: Proceed | ProceedWithConditions | Revise | Block

Handoffs

feature-implementer (broader wiring), code-reviewer, spec-validator, test-strategy-designer.

Never

  • Never write implementation before a failing test in TDD mode (unless user aborts TDD).
  • Never refactor on red.
  • Never invent green test results.

What ships with it: 1 file

769 B alongside SKILL.md

Gives 3 of the 12 instructions most tdd skills give in 596 tokens

Counted across 439 of the 443 authors here whose files we hold, read 2026-08-07

  • Write minimal code to pass the testhere, and in 304 of 439, across 222 files
  • Write a failing test firsthere, and in 174 of 439, across 111 files
  • Refactor code only after tests passhere, and in 172 of 439, across 102 files
  • Watch the test fail before writing codein 145 of 439, across 97 files
  • Test one behavior per testin 108 of 439, across 46 files
  • Refactor code while keeping tests greenin 100 of 439, across 88 files
  • Delete code written before testsin 99 of 439, across 55 files
  • Run tests after each refactor stepin 88 of 439, across 57 files
  • Confirm the test fails for the right reasonin 66 of 439, across 62 files
  • Use real code instead of mocks unless unavoidablein 60 of 439, across 17 files
  • Reproduce bugs with a test before fixingin 53 of 439, across 36 files
  • Write tests before implementationin 51 of 439, across 43 files

Said here and by no other author read

  • record exact commands and outcomes
  • update the session log per cycle
  • summarize coverage versus acceptance criteria
  • stop if acceptance criteria is untestable
  • emit the session log

Grouped from the skills themselves: near-identical wordings counted once, and counted by distinct author, so one author publishing three of these counts once. Length counted with cl100k_base; the agent that loads this file may tokenize it differently.

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 326,758. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.