Pwrl end session commit

PWRL End Session Commit

Draft a descriptive commit message and create the session commit with proper attribution.

Interaction Method

• Use platform's ask_user_question, ask_user, ask_user_input, vscode/askQuestions or any available extension/tool for user interaction for all decisions
• Ask one question at a time
• Use multiple-choice questions when possible
• If input is empty, ask: "What summarizes this session's work? Provide context and key decisions for the commit message."
• Provide clear recovery suggestions when errors occur

Purpose

Commit is the second phase of session cleanup. It takes the checkpoint artifact from Phase 1, crafts a meaningful commit message that explains the session's work and next steps, detects version changes, and creates the commit:

• Draft commit subject (imperative mood, ≤50 chars)
• Write commit body with decisions, blockers, and next steps
• Detect version bumps and update CHANGELOG.md if needed
• Get user approval, stage files, and create commit
• Capture commit SHA for logging and learnings chaining

Usage

# Typically invoked by /pwrl-end-session after checkpoint succeeds
# Direct usage for testing or recovery:
/pwrl-end-session-commit [checkpoint-artifact-path]

This is the second phase of /pwrl-end-session orchestrator, executed after Phase 1 (checkpoint) completes.

Support Files

• references/commit-protocol.md — Message drafting rules and version bump handling
• references/commit-examples.md — Examples for different session completion types

Detailed Workflow

For complete step-by-step instructions, see commit-protocol.md.

This SKILL.md provides an overview. The detailed workflow document contains:

• Commit subject drafting with imperative mood
• Commit body structure (why/what/next)
• Version bump detection and CHANGELOG.md updates
• User approval flow with edit capability
• Git staging and commit creation
• Error handling and recovery

Quality Gate Validation

After completing this phase, run quality gate validation:

/pwrl-phase-checkpoint end-session 2 [artifact-path]

See pwrl-phase-checkpoint for validation rules.

---

Workflow

Phase 1: Draft Commit Message

Create a meaningful commit message with subject and body.

See detailed workflow: commit-protocol.md

• Draft subject line (imperative, ≤50 chars)
• Write body: explain why, what changed, blockers/notes, next steps
• Validate format (subject ≤50, body readable, proper structure)

Phase 2: Handle Version Bump

Detect and process version changes with CHANGELOG.md updates.

See detailed workflow: commit-protocol.md

• If version_bumped flag is false: skip to Phase 3
• If true: extract new version from checkpoint artifact
• Update CHANGELOG.md with entry (date, version, summary)
• Stage CHANGELOG.md alongside approved files

Phase 3: User Approval

Get explicit approval of commit message before staging/committing.

See detailed workflow: commit-protocol.md

• Display full commit message to user
• Ask approve/edit/cancel
• If edit: allow modification of subject/body/next steps
• Re-validate message after edits
• Once approved, proceed to staging

Phase 4: Create Commit

Stage files and create the commit with proper git handling.

See detailed workflow: commit-protocol.md

• Verify git state (no merge/rebase in progress)
• Stage approved files: git add [files...]
• Verify staging with git status
• Create commit: git commit -m "[subject]" -m "[body]"
• Capture commit SHA
• Verify commit exists and contains [AGENT: ...] trailer

Rules

• ✓ Commit subject must be ≤50 chars, imperative mood
• ✓ User approval required before staging/committing
• ✓ No automatic push (user controls push timing)
• ✓ Version bump detection automatic, CHANGELOG.md auto-staged if needed
• ✓ Capture and return commit SHA for audit trail and learnings chaining

Best Practices

• Subject should be a clear, single action: "Fix typo" not "Fixed some typos and other stuff"
• Body should explain why work ended here, not just what changed
• Link to task/plan file if applicable (e.g., "Completed: docs/tasks/to-do/U1-feature.md")
• If work is partial or blocked, be explicit about blockers and next steps
• Keep message readable and future-friendly (someone will read this in 6 months)

Acceptance Criteria

• ✓ Input: Checkpoint artifact with approved_files and session_reason
• ✓ Output: Commit artifact with commit_sha, message, version_bumped flags
• ✓ Message: Subject ≤50 chars, body explains why/what/next, trailer present
• ✓ Verification: Commit created, SHA captured, version bump detected and CHANGELOG.md staged if needed
• ✓ User approval: Explicit confirmation obtained before committing