Hermes skill portfolio review

Portfolio Review

When to Use

Use this skill when the user wants to:

• review one or more crypto wallets;
• inspect visible DeFi, staking, claimable, or protocol positions;
• build a weekly/monthly portfolio informer;
• compare portfolio changes without storing raw balances or wallet data in state;
• troubleshoot DeBank/Jupiter browser extraction.

Procedure

1. Confirm the review goal: quick review, full allocation review, thesis/rebalance review, or recurring informer.
2. Load wallet addresses from a local ignored file such as addresses.conf, or ask the user for addresses explicitly.
3. For EVM wallets, open https://debank.com/profile/<address> through the configured browser path.
4. For Solana wallets, open https://jup.ag/portfolio/<address> and collect visible Jupiter Portfolio data.
5. Extract the top summary first: total/net worth, chain/wallet split, top tokens, protocol positions, staked/claimable amounts, and visible PnL/change signals.
6. Do not replace Jupiter Portfolio with a native-SOL-only RPC fallback in automated reports. That hides DeFi/staked/claimable positions and creates false confidence.
7. Reconcile rows before trusting totals: protocol rows and their wallet-token wrappers must not both be counted; liabilities subtract from value; stale or disputed rows stay audit-only.
8. Return a compact, actionable review: facts, issues, candidate actions, missing information, and 1–2 decisions for the next review cycle.
9. For recurring jobs, store only privacy-safe state: hashes, timestamps, and decision metadata. Do not store raw wallet addresses, balances, token amounts, percentages, holdings, or page text.

Local Configuration

Create a local addresses.conf from the example:

cp addresses.example.conf addresses.conf

Format:

evm_example=0xYOUR_EVM_ADDRESS
sol_example=11111111111111111111111111111111

addresses.conf, state files, logs, and debug outputs are intentionally ignored by git.

Source contracts

Use references/source-contracts-and-reconciliation.md when changing collectors or report logic. It defines source precedence, row contracts, stale/degraded reporting, correction-registry shape, and accounting invariants.

Scripts

Primary public script:

python3 scripts/chro-informer.py --dry-run --pretty
python3 scripts/validate-public-export.py

If your environment uses a wrapper script, keep it outside the repository or document it without private paths.

Pitfalls

• Browser-visible portfolio pages can merge totals, percentages, token rows, and protocol values into one accessibility-tree line; parser logic must handle that.
• Jupiter can show human-verification, marketing/login text, or an empty DOM in some browser profiles.
• A native Solana RPC balance is not equivalent to Jupiter Portfolio coverage.
• Do not publish live wallet addresses, state files, or debug dumps.
• Do not let a stale or disputed source row enter a clean total; mark it degraded/audit-only until reconciled.

Verification

• Run the script in dry-run mode against example or explicitly provided addresses.
• Confirm no raw wallet addresses/balances are written to state.
• Confirm the report includes source-specific sections for EVM/DeBank and Solana/Jupiter when both are configured.
• Confirm row accounting reconciles and stale/disputed rows are labeled degraded or audit-only.
• Run python3 scripts/validate-public-export.py before publishing.
• Run a static security scan before publishing.