Molly calibration
Skill warpdotdev/recruiting-sourcing-agent-oss/.warp/skills/molly-calibration
Executes Molly's calibration phase. Use when triggered by a recruiter approving or rejecting a candidate profile via Slack buttons, or when a recruiter @mentions Molly during an active calibration cycle.From its SKILL.md
npx -y skills add warpdotdev/recruiting-sourcing-agent-oss --skill molly-calibrationAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 1 stars1 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
SKILL.md
4.3 KB, ~1.1k tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it
Calibration
Triggered when a recruiter submits the "Review All Candidates" modal (via your Slack interactivity handler — see the README). Your prompt contains every decision at once: ROLE, CALIBRATION CYCLE, SPEC PAGE ID, JD PAGE ID, SLACK CHANNEL, SLACK THREAD TS, and a numbered list of candidates with APPROVED/REJECTED + optional feedback.
Steps
1. Update all rows in the calibration table
Read the spec page to find the calibration cycle table:
curl -s "https://api.notion.com/v1/blocks/SPEC_PAGE_ID/children?page_size=100" \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $MOLLY_NOTION_API_KEY" \
-H "Notion-Version: 2022-06-28"
Find the heading ## Calibration Cycle N (where N = CALIBRATION CYCLE). Get the table block that follows it. Get the table's row block IDs.
For each candidate, update the corresponding row (row index = candidate number, accounting for the header row at index 0):
curl -s -X PATCH "https://api.notion.com/v1/blocks/ROW_BLOCK_ID" \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $MOLLY_NOTION_API_KEY" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-H "Notion-Version: 2022-06-28" \
-d '{"table_row": {"cells": [
[{"type": "text", "text": {"content": "NAME", "link": {"url": "LINKEDIN_URL"}}}],
[{"type": "text", "text": {"content": "WHY_IT_FITS"}}],
[{"type": "text", "text": {"content": "yes_or_no"}}],
[{"type": "text", "text": {"content": "FEEDBACK_OR_EMPTY"}}]
]}}'
Count approvals (APPROVED decisions). All rows will always have a result since the modal requires all decisions before submitting. Continue to step 2.
2. Analyze the cycle and write Calibration Notes
Read all rows. Count approvals (yes) and rejections (no). Identify patterns in the feedback.
Append ## Calibration Notes N to the spec page with a brief summary:
- How many approved / rejected
- What the feedback reveals about the spec (e.g. "Rejections suggest candidates with large audiences but without hands-on developer community management are a miss")
- Whether another calibration cycle is needed (yes if fewer than the full batch approved)
curl -s -X PATCH "https://api.notion.com/v1/blocks/SPEC_PAGE_ID/children" \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $MOLLY_NOTION_API_KEY" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-H "Notion-Version: 2022-06-28" \
-d '{"children": [
{"type": "heading_2", "heading_2": {"rich_text": [{"text": {"content": "Calibration Notes N"}}]}},
{"type": "paragraph", "paragraph": {"rich_text": [{"text": {"content": "NOTES"}}]}}
]}'
If the full batch approved: update the Molly Tracker to Sourcing and announce in the Slack thread. Done.
If fewer approved: continue to step 3.
3. Update the spec based on feedback
If the rejections reveal something concrete about the spec (wrong target companies, wrong evaluation criteria, etc.), update the relevant sections of the spec page. Find the heading block for the section to update and patch its children.
4. Run the next calibration cycle
Search Exa for a new batch of candidates (MOLLY_CALIBRATION_BATCH_SIZE, default 5). Avoid names already in any prior calibration table on the spec page, and exclude anyone below the minimum current-company tenure (MOLLY_MIN_TENURE_MONTHS, default 6 months) — global sourcing rule (see AGENTS.md); read the current role's start date / duration from the profile (fetch the full contents if the snippet doesn't reach it) and skip short-tenure candidates, over-fetching so you still land a full batch.
curl -s -X POST "https://api.exa.ai/search" \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $MOLLY_EXA_API_KEY" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"query": "YOUR_QUERY", "numResults": 10, "type": "neural", "includeDomains": ["linkedin.com"], "contents": {"text": {"maxCharacters": 500}}}'
Append ## Calibration Cycle N+1 heading + empty 4-column table to the spec page. Add a row per candidate (Name+link, Why it fits, empty result, empty feedback).
Post the new batch to the same thread using the same Block Kit format as kick-off (with updated cycle_num = N+1 in the button value JSON).
What ships with it
Read from the repository
Just SKILL.md. No reference files, no scripts.
Gives 0 of the 12 instructions most hr recruiting skills give in ~1.1k tokens
Counted across 356 of the 357 authors here whose files we hold, read 2026-08-07
- Quantify achievements with specific metricsin 14 of 356, across 6 files
- Keep the resume under two pagesin 14 of 356, across 6 files
- Request the full job description if not providedin 12 of 356, across 4 files
- Extract keywords and prioritize job requirementsin 12 of 356, across 4 files
- Stop and ask for clarification if required inputs are missingin 12 of 356, across 5 files
- Map candidate experience to job requirementsin 11 of 356, across 3 files
- Ask if the user wants adjustmentsin 11 of 356, across 3 files
- Provide strengths and gap analysis after the resumein 10 of 356, across 2 files
- Request candidate background details if not providedin 10 of 356, across 2 files
- Format experience bullets as action verb plus resultin 10 of 356, across 2 files
- Ask for missing inputs before startingin 10 of 356, across 9 files
- Use exact job description terminologyin 9 of 356, across 1 file
Said here and by no other author read
- update rows in the calibration table
- count approvals and rejections
- append calibration notes to the spec page
- update spec sections based on rejection feedback
- search for a new candidate batch
- exclude previously evaluated candidates
Grouped from the skills themselves: near-identical wordings counted once, and counted by distinct author, so one author publishing three of these counts once. Length counted with cl100k_base; the agent that loads this file may tokenize it differently.