Test quality analysis
Detect test smells, overmocking, flaky tests, and coverage issues. Analyze test effectiveness, maintainability, and reliability. Use when reviewing tests or improving test quality.From its SKILL.md
npx -y skills add VRIL-LABS/skill-jam --skill test-quality-analysisAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
2 things to look at
- no licenseNo license file was found in the repository. Code published without one is not open source by default, so using it at work is a question for whoever answers licensing questions where you are.
- 0 stars0 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
SKILL.md
4.7 KB, ~1.1k tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it
Test Quality Analysis
Expert knowledge for analyzing and improving test quality - detecting test smells, overmocking, insufficient coverage, and testing anti-patterns.
Core Dimensions
- Correctness: Tests verify the right behavior
- Reliability: Tests are deterministic, not flaky
- Maintainability: Tests are easy to understand
- Performance: Tests run quickly
- Coverage: Tests cover critical code paths
- Isolation: Tests don't depend on external state
Test Smells
Overmocking
Problem: Mocking too many dependencies makes tests fragile.
// ❌ BAD: Overmocked
test('calculate total', () => {
const mockAdd = vi.fn(() => 10)
const mockMultiply = vi.fn(() => 20)
// Testing implementation, not behavior
})
// ✅ GOOD: Mock only external dependencies
test('calculate order total', () => {
const mockPricingAPI = vi.fn(() => ({ tax: 0.1 }))
const total = calculateTotal(order, mockPricingAPI)
expect(total).toBe(38)
})
Detection: More than 3-4 mocks, mocking pure functions, complex mock setup.
Fix: Mock only I/O boundaries (APIs, databases, filesystem).
Fragile Tests
Problem: Tests break with unrelated code changes.
// ❌ BAD: Tests implementation details
await page.locator('.form-container > div:nth-child(2) > button').click()
// ✅ GOOD: Semantic selector
await page.getByRole('button', { name: 'Submit' }).click()
Flaky Tests
Problem: Tests pass or fail non-deterministically.
// ❌ BAD: Race condition
test('loads data', async () => {
fetchData()
await new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(resolve, 1000))
expect(data).toBeDefined()
})
// ✅ GOOD: Proper async handling
test('loads data', async () => {
const data = await fetchData()
expect(data).toBeDefined()
})
Poor Assertions
// ❌ BAD: Weak assertion
test('returns users', async () => {
const users = await getUsers()
expect(users).toBeDefined() // Too vague!
})
// ✅ GOOD: Strong, specific assertions
test('creates user with correct attributes', async () => {
const user = await createUser({ name: 'John' })
expect(user).toMatchObject({
id: expect.any(Number),
name: 'John',
})
})
Analysis Tools
# Vitest coverage (prefer bun)
bun test --coverage
open coverage/index.html
# Check thresholds
bun test --coverage --coverage.thresholds.lines=80
# pytest-cov (Python)
uv run pytest --cov --cov-report=html
open htmlcov/index.html
Best Practices Checklist
Unit Test Quality (FIRST)
- Fast: Tests run in milliseconds
- Isolated: No dependencies between tests
- Repeatable: Same results every time
- Self-validating: Clear pass/fail
- Timely: Written alongside code
Mock Guidelines
- Mock only external dependencies
- Don't mock business logic or pure functions
- Use real implementations when possible
- Limit to 3-4 mocks per test maximum
Coverage Goals
- 80%+ line coverage for business logic
- 100% for critical paths (auth, payment)
- All error paths tested
- Boundary conditions tested
Test Structure (AAA Pattern)
test('user registration', async () => {
// Arrange
const userData = { email: '[email protected]' }
// Act
const user = await registerUser(userData)
// Assert
expect(user.email).toBe('[email protected]')
})
Code Review Checklist
- Tests verify behavior, not implementation
- Assertions are specific and meaningful
- No flaky tests (timing, ordering issues)
- Proper async/await usage
- Test names clearly describe behavior
- Minimal code duplication
- Critical paths have tests
- Both happy path and error cases covered
Common Anti-Patterns
Testing Implementation Details
// ❌ BAD
const spy = vi.spyOn(Math, 'sqrt')
calculateDistance()
expect(spy).toHaveBeenCalled() // Testing how, not what
// ✅ GOOD
const distance = calculateDistance({ x: 0, y: 0 }, { x: 3, y: 4 })
expect(distance).toBe(5) // Testing output
Mocking Too Much
// ❌ BAD
const mockAdd = vi.fn((a, b) => a + b)
// ✅ GOOD: Use real implementations
import { add } from './utils'
// Only mock external services
const mockPaymentGateway = vi.fn()
See Also
vitest-testing- TypeScript/JavaScript testingplaywright-testing- E2E testingmutation-testing- Validate test effectiveness
What ships with it
Read from the repository
Just SKILL.md. No reference files, no scripts.