Knowledge ask

Knowledge Ask

Answer a freeform question by searching the Basic Memory knowledge graph, loading relevant notes, traversing 1-hop neighbors, and synthesizing a cited answer. Each answer includes a confidence tier (Direct, Partial, or No Coverage) so the user knows how much the graph actually covers.

Read-only -- never writes or modifies notes. When coverage is incomplete, suggests /intel or /knowledge-gaps to fill the gap.

Arguments

The user provides a topic or question after the skill invocation:

Form	Example
Topic phrase	/knowledge-ask fastify error handling
Natural language question	/knowledge-ask how does pino redaction work?
Concept	/knowledge-ask IndieWeb
Package identifier (with prefix)	/knowledge-ask npm:undici
Tool identifier (with prefix)	/knowledge-ask brew:ripgrep
gh CLI extension (with prefix)	/knowledge-ask gh:meiji163/gh-notify

Prefixed identifiers (npm:, crate:, brew:, action:, gh:, etc.) trigger a fast existence check via list_directory in addition to the hybrid search.

Edge Cases

• No results -- assign "No Coverage" confidence. Report "Basic Memory has no notes matching this question." Suggest /intel <pkg> if the query looks like a package or tool name.
• BM unavailable -- report the error and suggest trying again later. The PostToolUseFailure hook covers BM write-tool errors only; read-tool failures (search_notes, read_note, build_context) surface as raw error strings.
• Ambiguous query -- if search_notes returns results spanning 3+ unrelated topics, pick the best-matching cluster and note "Results also touched [other topics] -- narrow your query for those."
• Package/tool not in BM -- if a prefixed query (e.g., npm:undici) has no list_directory match and no search results, report "No note found for npm:undici." and suggest /intel undici to create it.
• Very broad query -- if the query maps to an entire ecosystem directory (e.g., "what do I know about npm packages"), use list_directory(dir_name="npm", depth=1) to report directory-level counts rather than loading individual notes. Suggest /knowledge-prime for project-scoped overviews or /knowledge-gaps for coverage audits.
• Schema notes in results -- exclude notes with titles starting with schema/ from the answer synthesis. These are structural definitions, not knowledge content.

Workflow

1. Search

Run a hybrid search (the default mode) against Basic Memory:

search_notes(query="<user question>", page_size=10)

If the query contains a recognized ecosystem prefix (npm:, crate:, go:, composer:, pypi:, gem:, brew:, cask:, action:, docker:, vscode:, gh:), also run a fast existence check:

list_directory(dir_name="<ecosystem-dir>", file_name_glob="*<name>*")

Prefix-to-directory mapping:

Prefix	Directory
npm:	npm/
crate:	crates/
go:	go/
composer:	composer/
pypi:	pypi/
gem:	gems/
brew:	brew/
cask:	casks/
action:	actions/
docker:	docker/
vscode:	vscode/
gh:	gh/

Filter out schema notes (titles starting with schema/) from the results.

If fewer than 3 unique note topics are returned, note this as a sparse coverage signal for the confidence tier in step 4.

2. Load candidates

For the top 3 results from step 1, load full note content:

read_note(identifier="<note-title>", include_frontmatter=true)

Extract observations relevant to the user's question. When multiple observations match, prioritize by category: [gotcha] > [breaking] > [limitation] > [pattern] > [decision] > [lesson]

Token budget: Load at most 3 notes fully. If a note is very long (50+ observations), extract only the observations relevant to the question rather than quoting the entire section.

3. Traverse graph

Expand the highest-scoring note's immediate neighborhood:

build_context(url="<top-result-title>", depth=1, max_related=5)

Check whether any 1-hop neighbor is more relevant to the question than the direct search results. If a neighbor is a better fit, load it:

read_note(identifier="<neighbor-title>", include_frontmatter=true)

Load at most 1 additional note from graph traversal. Stop at 1 hop -- do not recurse further.

4. Assign confidence

Based on the loaded notes and observations, assign one of three confidence tiers:

Tier	Condition
Direct	One or more notes directly address the question with specific observations
Partial	Notes touch the topic but don't fully answer, or only tangential neighbors matched
No Coverage	No notes found, or only schema notes matched

5. Synthesize answer

Produce a structured answer using this template:

## Answer: <question>

**Coverage:** Direct / Partial / No Coverage

<Prose answer, 2-5 sentences. Quote observations directly with
[[note-title]] - [category] citations. Stick to what the graph contains --
never hallucinate facts not present in the loaded notes.>

### Sources
- [[<note-title>]] -- <one-line reason this note was relevant>

### Coverage Gaps
<Only if Partial or No Coverage>
- **<subject>** -- Not documented. Run `/intel <pkg>` to create.

Rules:

• Omit the "Coverage Gaps" section entirely when confidence is Direct.
• For "No Coverage" answers: report "Basic Memory has no notes matching this question." -- never invent content.
• If the query looks project-scoped (mentions "this project", "our deps", "this codebase"), add a handoff hint: "For project-wide context, try /knowledge-prime."
• If the query is broad enough to warrant a coverage audit, suggest /knowledge-gaps instead.

Guidelines

• Read-only -- this skill never writes, edits, or deletes notes
• Graph-first -- always search Basic Memory before answering; never answer from general knowledge alone
• Cite sources -- every factual claim must reference a [[note-title]]
• Prefer precision -- a narrow accurate answer beats a broad speculative one
• Gap-fill suggestions -- when coverage is incomplete, suggest the right skill to fill it (/intel or /knowledge-gaps)
• Max 1-hop traversal -- stop at direct neighbors to keep latency low and avoid context bloat