Verification
Skill VoDaiLocz/kilo-kit-mcp/skills/kilo-kit/debugging/verification
Comprehensive fix verification methodology to ensure bugs are truly fixed. Use after implementing any bug fix to verify it works and hasn't caused regressions. Keywords: verify, confirm, test, validate, check, ensure, regression, fixedFrom its SKILL.md
npx -y skills add VoDaiLocz/kilo-kit-mcp --skill verificationAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 24 stars24 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
SKILL.md
9.3 KB, ~2.2k tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it
β Fix Verification Skill
Philosophy: A bug isn't fixed until it's verified. Twice.
When to Use
Use this skill when:
- You've implemented a bug fix
- Someone else's fix needs verification
- Deploying a fix to production
- Bug was high-impact and needs thorough verification
- Previous fixes for this bug have failed
Do NOT use this skill when:
- Just exploring code (no fix yet)
- Bug is trivial (e.g., typo fix)
- Running standard CI (automated verification)
Prerequisites
Before starting:
- Fix has been implemented
- You know the expected behavior
- You can reproduce the original bug (or have a failing test)
- You have access to test environment
Process
Phase 1: DIRECT VERIFICATION π―
Goal: Confirm the fix addresses the exact reported issue.
Steps:
-
Recreate the Original Bug Scenario
Exact steps that caused the bug: 1. [step 1] 2. [step 2] 3. [step 3] Expected result: [what should happen] Previous result: [what was happening - the bug] -
Execute Test with Fix Applied
- Follow exact same steps
- Document actual result
- Compare to expected
-
Verify the FIX, Not Just Absence of Error
β "It doesn't crash anymore" (incomplete) β "It returns the expected user object with correct fields" (complete) -
Test Multiple Times
- Run at least 3 times
- Note any inconsistency
Verification Checklist:
- Original bug scenario no longer produces error
- Expected behavior now occurs
- Result is consistent across multiple runs
- All variations of bug scenario work
Phase 2: EDGE CASE VERIFICATION π²
Goal: Ensure fix works for edge cases and variations.
Steps:
-
Identify Edge Cases
edge_cases: boundary_values: - Empty input - Maximum length input - Minimum valid input - Just over limit - Just under limit special_inputs: - Null/undefined - Special characters - Unicode/emoji - Numbers as strings - Whitespace only state_variations: - First time user - Returning user - Admin user - Concurrent users - High load -
Create Edge Case Matrix
Edge Case Input Expected Actual Pass? Empty "" Error msg Max length 1000 chars Success Special chars "<>&" Escaped -
Test Each Edge Case
- Document results
- Note any failures
Edge Case Checklist:
- All boundary values tested
- Special inputs handled correctly
- Different user states work
- Concurrent access works (if applicable)
Phase 3: REGRESSION TESTING π
Goal: Ensure fix hasn't broken anything else.
Steps:
-
Identify Affected Areas
affected_areas: directly_affected: - The fixed function/component - Its callers - Its dependencies indirectly_affected: - Related features - Shared utilities used - Configuration changes -
Run Targeted Tests
# Run tests for affected module npm test -- --grep "auth" # Run integration tests npm run test:integration -
Run Full Test Suite
# Ensure no regressions anywhere npm test -
Manual Smoke Test
- Test main user flows
- Pay attention to anything that feels different
Regression Checklist:
- All unit tests pass
- All integration tests pass
- Smoke test passes
- No new warnings in logs
- Performance not degraded
Phase 4: NEGATIVE TESTING π«
Goal: Verify error handling and failure modes.
Steps:
-
Test Invalid Inputs
- What happens with bad data?
- Are errors handled gracefully?
- Are error messages helpful?
-
Test Failure Scenarios
failure_scenarios: - Database connection lost - API timeout - Invalid credentials - Missing permissions - Disk full -
Test Recovery
- Does system recover after failure?
- Is data consistent after recovery?
Negative Testing Checklist:
- Invalid inputs produce clear errors
- System fails gracefully
- Recovery works correctly
- No security information leaked in errors
Phase 5: ENVIRONMENT VERIFICATION π
Goal: Ensure fix works across all environments.
Steps:
-
Test Across Environments
Environment Tested Result Notes Local dev CI/CD Staging Production -
Test Across Configurations
- Different browsers (if applicable)
- Different OS (if applicable)
- Different database sizes
- Different load levels
-
Test Across User Types
- Regular users
- Admin users
- New users
- Users with existing data
Environment Checklist:
- Works in development
- Works in staging
- Works in production (or production-like)
- Works across configurations
Phase 6: DOCUMENTATION & SIGN-OFF π
Goal: Document verification and get sign-off.
Steps:
-
Complete Verification Report
## Fix Verification Report **Bug ID:** [ID] **Fix Description:** [brief description] **Verified By:** [name] **Date:** [date] ### Direct Verification - [x] Original bug no longer occurs - [x] Expected behavior confirmed ### Edge Cases - [x] [edge case 1] - PASS - [x] [edge case 2] - PASS ### Regression Testing - [x] Unit tests: 100% pass - [x] Integration tests: 100% pass - [x] Smoke test: PASS ### Environment Testing - [x] Local: PASS - [x] Staging: PASS - [x] Production: [pending/pass] ### Sign-off - [ ] Developer - [ ] QA (if applicable) - [ ] Stakeholder (for critical bugs) -
Update Bug Tracking
- Change status to "Verified Fixed"
- Add verification notes
- Link to any new tests added
-
Add/Update Tests
- Ensure test exists for this bug
- Test should fail without fix, pass with fix
Quick Verification Checklist
For simpler bugs, use this shortened checklist:
## Quick Verification
- [ ] Original bug scenario fixed
- [ ] Edge cases work
- [ ] All tests pass
- [ ] No new warnings/errors
- [ ] Reviewed by another person (if critical)
Verification Decision Tree
Fix Implemented
β
βΌ
βββββββββββββββββββ
β Does original β
β scenario work? β
ββββββββββ¬βββββββββ
YES β NO β Back to debugging
βΌ
βββββββββββββββββββ
β Edge cases β
β work? β
ββββββββββ¬βββββββββ
YES β NO β Expand fix
βΌ
βββββββββββββββββββ
β All tests β
β pass? β
ββββββββββ¬βββββββββ
YES β NO β Fix regressions
βΌ
βββββββββββββββββββ
β Works in all β
β environments? β
ββββββββββ¬βββββββββ
YES β NO β Environment-specific fix
βΌ
VERIFIED β
Guidelines
DO β
- Verify the fix, not just absence of error
- Test edge cases thoroughly
- Document your verification
- Run the full test suite
- Have someone else verify critical fixes
DON'T β
- Assume fix works because code looks right
- Skip edge case testing
- Forget to check for regressions
- Test only in development environment
- Skip documentation
Common Pitfalls
"Works on My Machine"
Problem: Fix works locally but fails elsewhere.
Prevention:
- Always test in staging
- Use same data/config as production
- Test with production-like load
"Fixed the Symptom, Not the Bug"
Problem: Error is gone but behavior is still wrong.
Prevention:
- Verify POSITIVE behavior, not just absence of error
- Compare to expected behavior documentation
- Test the complete user flow
"Created a New Bug"
Problem: Fix introduced a regression.
Prevention:
- Always run full test suite
- Manual smoke test of related features
- Review changes with fresh eyes
Success Criteria
Before marking bug as fixed:
- Original issue verified fixed
- All edge cases pass
- No regression in tests
- Works in all environments
- Verification documented
- Test added to prevent recurrence
Related Skills
skills/kilo-kit/debugging/systematic/- For finding the bugskills/kilo-kit/debugging/root-cause/- For understanding why it happenedskills/kilo-kit/quality/testing/- For writing better tests
Fix Verification Skill v1.0.0 β Verified twice, deployed once
What ships with it
Read from the repository
Just SKILL.md. No reference files, no scripts.