E2e testing
Writes and runs end-to-end tests that prove critical user flows work in a real browser. Use when unit tests pass but user journeys need verification, before release of UI flows, or when regressions happen only in full-stack integration.From its SKILL.md
npx -y skills add vindreshsingh/engineering-skills --skill e2e-testingAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 0 stars0 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
SKILL.md
4.2 KB, 992 tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it
E2E Testing
Unit tests prove functions work; E2E tests prove users can complete journeys. A checkout flow, login, or "first connection" path that only works in isolation is not shippable — exercise it in a real browser against a running app.
Pairs with [[test-first]] for unit/integration layers, [[browser-checks]] for manual/exploratory verification, [[spec-first]] for scenarios to automate, [[pipeline-ops]] to run E2E in CI, and [[launch-readiness]] before promoting to production.
Use the e2e testing checklist alongside this process.
When to Use
- Critical user journey must not break (auth, signup, payment, core feature path)
- Bug only reproduces full-stack or in browser
- Before release of a new UI flow
- After refactor touching routing, auth, or API integration
- Replacing manual regression with automated smoke suite
Skip for pure backend/API changes with no user journey impact — use [[test-first]] only.
Process
1. Pick flows — not every screen
Prioritize by risk and frequency:
| Tier | Examples | E2E depth |
|---|---|---|
| P0 smoke | Login, signup, core happy path | Every PR / nightly |
| P1 | Settings, secondary flows | Nightly |
| P2 | Edge cases, admin | Weekly or pre-release |
Start with 3–5 P0 flows max — flaky huge suites get ignored.
2. Write scenarios from spec
Each test = one user goal from [[spec-first]] acceptance criteria:
Given [starting state]
When [user actions]
Then [observable outcome]
One behavior per test. Name tests after the user outcome, not the selector.
3. Choose stack and conventions
Pick one and stick to it:
- Playwright — recommended for modern web (Chromium, Firefox, WebKit)
- Cypress — good DX for React apps
Conventions:
data-testidfor stable selectors — avoid CSS classes and nth-child- Page object or fixture pattern when flows share steps
- Seed test data via API or factory — don't depend on prod data
- Run against staging or local with test DB — never prod
4. Implement — arrange, act, assert
1. Arrange — seed user/data, navigate to start URL
2. Act — user clicks, fills, submits (one journey)
3. Assert — URL, visible text, API side effect, DB state
4. Cleanup — delete test user/data if needed
Rules:
- No arbitrary sleeps — wait for network idle, selector, or API response
- Isolate tests — each can run alone and in parallel
- Deterministic data — unique emails (
test+${runId}@example.com) - Capture artifacts on failure — screenshot, trace, video in CI
5. Wire into CI ([[pipeline-ops]])
- Run P0 smoke on PR (allow 5–10 min budget)
- Full suite nightly
- Fail PR on P0 break; quarantine flaky tests within 24h — don't mute forever
- Store traces as CI artifacts
6. Maintain — flaky is failure
- Retry max 1–2 in CI only after fixing root cause
- Track flaky rate; >2% means investigate selectors or timing
- Update tests when intentional UI change — same PR as code
Common Rationalizations
- "Unit tests cover it" — Integration gaps hide in wiring, routing, and cookies.
- "E2E is too slow for CI" — Run smoke only on PR; full suite nightly.
- "We'll add E2E later" — Later never comes; P0 flows first.
- "Sleep 3 seconds works" — Flakes follow; use proper waits.
Red Flags
- Tests depend on execution order
- Hard-coded prod URLs or credentials
- Selectors tied to CSS modules that change weekly
- Suite disabled in CI "temporarily" for months
- No test for the primary revenue or signup path
Verification
- P0 flows identified (3–5 max) with spec traceability
- Tests use stable selectors and deterministic data
- Each test runs isolated; no sleep-based waits
- P0 smoke runs in CI on PR
- Failure artifacts (screenshot/trace) configured
- Flaky tests quarantined or fixed — not ignored
What ships with it
Read from the repository
Just SKILL.md. No reference files, no scripts.