agentsclimarketplace

Write survey

Skill VincenzoImp/academic-research-skills/skills/write-survey

Use when writing the project survey from the digested SOTA or updating it after the SOTA changed — grouping design, gaps and research directions, and coverage maintenance.From its SKILL.md

Install
npx -y skills add VincenzoImp/academic-research-skills --skill write-survey

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

One thing to look at

  • 0 stars0 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.

What its file declares

Copied from the file, not written here

The file declares its own license as MIT. That is the author’s claim about this one file, and it is not the same thing as the license GitHub reports for the repository, which is listed with the other numbers below.

SKILL.md

3.1 KB, 702 tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it

Write Survey

Produce or maintain survey/survey.tex: the single, complete, detailed reading reference for the whole SOTA. After reading the survey, nobody should need to reopen syntheses or PDFs for the large majority of questions.

Read First

  • survey/README.md — the survey contract
  • sota/index.md — what the SOTA currently contains
  • survey/coverage.md — what the survey currently integrates
  • references/survey-content.md — content checklist and style

The survey renders citations author-year (biblatex style=authoryear, per survey/README.md) — a discursive review reads better than numbered [1].

Mode Selection

  • survey/coverage.md lists no citekeys → create mode.
  • Otherwise → update mode. The user can force a full rewrite, which is create mode.

Create Mode

  1. Hard gate: read every synthesis. List all digested citekeys from sota/index.md, read every sota/papers/<citekey>/synthesis.md, and confirm the count matches before writing a single word of survey prose.
  2. Design the grouping from what was read: themes, concepts, methodologies — whatever organization fits this SOTA best. Write the outline as LaTeX section comments first.
  3. Write section by section: per group, discuss each paper's contributions and notable aspects in depth, compare approaches, name tensions and contradictions. Respect each synthesis's "Safe claims / do-not-claim" section. Cite with \cite{<citekey>} only; every key resolves in the root references.bib.
  4. Write the mandatory final content section, Gaps and Research Directions, grounded in the full picture per references/survey-content.md.
  5. Fill survey/coverage.md with every integrated citekey.
  6. Build (make survey) and validate (make check). Fix all errors.

Update Mode

  1. Diff: to_add = digested keys in sota/index.md missing from coverage.md; to_remove = covered keys now excluded or gone.
  2. Read the syntheses of to_add and the survey sections they belong to.
  3. Integrate additions into the right groups — extend or restructure a group when the new papers change its internal logic; never just append.
  4. Excise removals: delete their discussion, repair comparisons and transitions that referenced them, re-check the gaps section.
  5. Update coverage.md, rebuild, run make check.

Rules

  • Every statement about a paper is supported by its synthesis (or its PDF when more depth is needed) — never by model memory.
  • The survey is self-contained: detailed enough to replace re-reading the SOTA for most purposes. No length limit; completeness wins.
  • Never edit references.bib from this skill: a missing entry means the SOTA work is incomplete — stop and report.

Done When

  • coverage.md equals the set of digested citekeys (or the user-approved subset), survey.pdf is rebuilt, make check passes

What ships with it: 1 file

1.0 KB alongside SKILL.md

references/

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 326,499. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.