Rite quick
Skill ViktorsBaikers/DevRites/evals/behavioral/controls/rite-quick
Express lane for a small reversible change: typo/copy/config, rate-limit constant, error message, local variable rename, feature flag, README link, one-file/function fix.From its SKILL.md
npx -y skills add ViktorsBaikers/DevRites --skill rite-quickAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
2 things to look at
- no licenseNo license file was found in the repository. Code published without one is not open source by default, so using it at work is a question for whoever answers licensing questions where you are.
- 1 stars1 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
SKILL.md
5.5 KB, ~1.3k tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it
/rite-quick: express lane for small changes
The full DevRites lifecycle is right for real features; it is ceremony for a typo, a
copy tweak, a one-function fix, or a small config change. /rite-quick keeps the
discipline that matters (idiom, TDD, evidence, escape-to-full-lifecycle) and drops the
artifacts that don't, in a single pass. Senior-engineer "right step, right time" made
executable, not advisory.
The significance gate (the whole safety story)
Run this first. If ANY of these holds, STOP and route to /rite-spec. Do NOT use the
express lane:
- Touches auth / authz, a data migration, a public API contract, or any
destructive / data-loss path in the irreversible-risk list. See
standards/afk-hitl.md. - Spans more than one vertical slice, or more than a couple of files of real logic.
- Ambiguous scope: you'd have to guess what "done" means, or the ask hides a design decision (data model, new dependency, second design system).
- Security-sensitive input handling, or a measurable performance-critical path.
- Would break a declared project principle (
.devrites/principles.md) with no recorded, human-approved exception: the express lane never relaxes a project gate; a needed exception is a deliberate human decision, so route it to/rite-spec.
If none hold, the change is small + reversible + unambiguous → proceed. When in doubt, escalate: the cost of the full lifecycle on a small change is minutes; the cost of the express lane on a risky one is the failure mode the lifecycle exists to prevent.
Rules consulted
Load this lane's conditional standards when needed:
coding-style.md: naming, guard clauses, reuse-first.testing.md: TDD, completeness (every touched behavior/element asserted) + assertion strength (no tautological tests; see it fail first), scaled to the change.error-handling.md/security.md: only if the change touches input/errors.principles.md: when.devrites/principles.mdexists; a change that breaks an invariant is a gate, not a quick fix.definition-of-done.md: standing Done bar: acceptance mapped, fresh proof, no open hard gates, scoped edits, rollback/docs where needed.
Workflow
- Orient. Read
core.md. If a.devrites/workspace is active, run the preamble to see it;/rite-quickdoes not require one and does not create the full tree. - Significance gate (above). Fail → STOP, tell the user to run
/rite-spec <feature>. - One-line contract. Restate in 1-3 lines: the change, its acceptance (how you'll
know it works), and the scope boundary (what you will NOT touch). This is the entire
"spec + plan" for a quick change: keep it in the chat; optionally drop a
brief.md+evidence.mdunder.devrites/work/<slug>/if the user wants a record. This is the/rite-frameFRAME move: if the acceptance won't reduce to a check that could be false, the ask is ambiguous → escalate per the significance gate. Its AUDIT pass is the diff self-review in step 5. - Build with TDD. Failing test first when behavior changes (see it fail for the right reason) → smallest complete change in the project's idiom (reuse before you write, anti-AI-slop) → cover every touched behavior / interactive element with a real assertion. UI → check the states + a browser glance.
- Prove (scoped). Run the targeted tests + typecheck / lint for what changed (not the whole suite) → green. Record the command + output. A tautological test that can't fail is not proof.
- Review-lite + ship. Self-review the diff for correctness, scope, and idiom. If
.devrites/principles.mdexists, confirm that no declared invariant is broken. This is/rite-frame's AUDIT pass: one pass, no subagent fan-out. Show the diff, then on the user's confirm commit it (Conventional Commits, atomic), or hand to/rite-shipif a workspace is active. Never push without the user asking.
Escalation (mid-flight): the Spec Drift Guard still applies
If the "small" change turns out to be not small: a second slice appears, a real design
decision surfaces, scope grows past the boundary, or you hit an irreversible-risk item:
STOP, say so, and route to /rite-spec / /rite-define. Don't quietly grow a quick
fix into an unreviewed feature; that's the exact drift the lifecycle guards against.
Output
Run devrites-engine progress when a workspace is active; otherwise skip it. Then use the
shared completion reply contract
(devrites-lib/reference/reply-contract.md).
Default success shape:
Done: quick change complete — <one line>.
Changed: <files touched>
Evidence: tests <cmd -> pass>; assertion check <real asserts saw red | n/a>; boundary held yes
Open: <none | non-blocking follow-up | tracked workspace needs ship>
Next: <single recommended command>
Record: <commit/PR path | .devrites/work/<slug>/evidence.md | not applicable>
↻ Hygiene: /clear after commit
If the quick boundary does not hold or an escalation remains, use Stopped / blocked
and route to the full lifecycle; do not render Done.
DO NOT use this lane to dodge the gate: the express lane is for changes that are genuinely small, not for shipping risky work faster.