Planning and task breakdown
Skill vignesh2027/AI-AGENT-SKILLS/skills/planning-and-task-breakdown
Turn your ai agent into senior engineer..The result is fast code that fails slowly. AI Agent Skills solves this by giving agents the same disciplined workflows senior engineers use
npx -y skills add vignesh2027/AI-AGENT-SKILLS --skill planning-and-task-breakdownAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 2 stars2 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Decompose work into atomic, independently verifiable tasks
SKILL.md
2.9 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
Overview
Good task breakdown is the difference between a project that ships incrementally and one that delivers a big-bang surprise at the deadline. Tasks must be atomic (one logical unit), verifiable (you can prove it's done), and independent (completable without blocking on other tasks).
When to Use
- After writing a spec, before starting implementation
- When estimating a project
- When coordinating work across multiple engineers
- When a task has been "in progress" for more than 2 days
Process
Step 1: Identify vertical slices
A vertical slice delivers end-to-end value: from input to storage to output. Prefer slices over horizontal layers (don't plan "do all the models, then all the controllers, then all the views").
Step 2: Write tasks in the format: [Verb] [Object] [Constraint]
Good: "Add rate limiting to the /api/search endpoint (max 100 req/min per user)" Bad: "Rate limiting"
Step 3: Apply the two-day rule
No task should take more than 2 days. If it does, break it down further. If it genuinely can't be broken down, flag it as a risk.
Step 4: Define done for each task
Each task must have a clear, observable "done" state: test passes, endpoint returns 200, UI renders without error, migration runs cleanly.
Step 5: Identify dependencies
Draw or list which tasks must complete before others can start. Minimize dependencies — they are schedule risk.
Step 6: Identify the critical path
The longest chain of dependent tasks sets the minimum delivery time. Optimize this chain first.
Step 7: Add a buffer
Add 20% time to estimates for unknowns. If you've never done something before, add 50%.
Step 8: Sequence for early learning
Put the riskiest tasks first. You want to discover impossible requirements on day 2, not day 20.
Anti-Rationalizations
"These tasks are too small to track" If it's too small to track, it's too small to lose track of — which means it will be forgotten. Track it.
"I'll figure out the subtasks as I go" Figuring out subtasks during execution means context-switching between planning mode and execution mode. Do the planning upfront.
"The spec is clear enough — I don't need to break it down" A spec describes the destination. A task breakdown is the map. You need both.
Red Flags
- Tasks without acceptance criteria
- Tasks estimated at "a few hours" that have been open for a week
- All tasks blocked on one person
- No buffer in the plan
Verification Requirements
- Every task has a verb-object-constraint format
- No task is estimated over 2 days
- Every task has a measurable "done" state
- Dependencies are mapped
- Critical path is identified
- 20% buffer included
- Riskiest tasks are sequenced first