Microservices design
Skill vignesh2027/AI-AGENT-SKILLS/skills/microservices-design
Turn your ai agent into senior engineer..The result is fast code that fails slowly. AI Agent Skills solves this by giving agents the same disciplined workflows senior engineers use
npx -y skills add vignesh2027/AI-AGENT-SKILLS --skill microservices-designAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 2 stars2 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Design service boundaries, contracts, and failure modes for distributed systems
SKILL.md
2.6 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
Overview
Microservices solve a people problem (independent team deployments) while creating a technical problem (distributed systems complexity). This skill only adds microservices when they solve a real problem, and designs them to be independently deployable, failure-isolated, and observable.
When to Use
- Before splitting a monolith into services
- When designing a new service in an existing distributed system
- When services are tightly coupled in ways that prevent independent deployment
Process
Step 1: Justify the split
A service split is justified when: teams are blocked on each other's deployments, scaling requirements differ dramatically, or technology requirements differ. Don't split for "separation of concerns" alone — a module achieves that at lower cost.
Step 2: Define service boundaries by business capability
Services should own a business capability end-to-end. Don't split by technical layer (don't make a "user data service" that stores data for 10 other services).
Step 3: Design the interface contract
Services communicate via explicit contracts. Define the contract before implementation. Version it from day one.
Step 4: Choose communication style
- Sync (HTTP/gRPC): Use when caller needs the result immediately
- Async (messaging): Use when caller does not need immediate result; decouples availability
Async is better for resilience; sync is simpler to reason about. Choose based on the requirement.
Step 5: Design for failure isolation
Service A must not fail because Service B is slow or unavailable:
- Timeouts on all outbound calls
- Circuit breakers for repeated failures
- Fallback responses or graceful degradation
- Bulkhead pattern: don't let one failing downstream exhaust connection pools
Step 6: Distributed data
Each service owns its data store. No shared databases. Services that need data from another service: use the API, or replicate via events. Cross-service joins are a design smell.
Step 7: Distributed tracing
All services propagate trace IDs. You must be able to trace a request across all services it touches.
Verification Requirements
- Service split justified with a specific team or scaling problem
- Service boundary follows business capability
- Contract versioned from day one
- All outbound calls have timeouts and circuit breakers
- No shared databases between services
- Distributed tracing propagated