agentsclimarketplace

Vector db patterns

Skill vibeeval/vibecosystem/skills/vector-db-patterns

AI software team for Claude Code - 138 agents, 295 skills, 73 hooks. Self-learning, multi-agent swarm, autonomous skill evolution.

Install
npx -y skills add vibeeval/vibecosystem --skill vector-db-patterns

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

What its author says it does

Copied from the file, not written here

Embedding strategies, ANN algorithms, hybrid search, RAG chunking strategies, and reranking for semantic search and retrieval.

SKILL.md

8.7 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it

Vector DB Patterns

Semantic search and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) patterns with vector databases.

Embedding Strategies

import { OpenAI } from 'openai'

const openai = new OpenAI()

// Batch embedding for efficiency (max 2048 inputs per request for text-embedding-3-small)
async function embedTexts(texts: string[]): Promise<number[][]> {
  const BATCH_SIZE = 2048
  const allEmbeddings: number[][] = []

  for (let i = 0; i < texts.length; i += BATCH_SIZE) {
    const batch = texts.slice(i, i + BATCH_SIZE)
    const response = await openai.embeddings.create({
      model: 'text-embedding-3-small',  // 1536 dimensions, good cost/quality
      input: batch,
      dimensions: 512,                  // Reduce dims for speed (Matryoshka)
    })
    allEmbeddings.push(...response.data.map(d => d.embedding))
  }

  return allEmbeddings
}

// Embed with prefix for asymmetric retrieval
async function embedForSearch(query: string): Promise<number[]> {
  const [embedding] = await embedTexts([`search_query: ${query}`])
  return embedding
}

async function embedForStorage(document: string): Promise<number[]> {
  const [embedding] = await embedTexts([`search_document: ${document}`])
  return embedding
}

Chunking Strategies for RAG

interface Chunk {
  id: string
  text: string
  metadata: {
    sourceId: string
    chunkIndex: number
    startChar: number
    endChar: number
  }
}

// Recursive character splitting with overlap
function chunkText(
  text: string,
  chunkSize: number = 512,
  overlap: number = 50
): Chunk[] {
  const separators = ['\n\n', '\n', '. ', ' ']
  return recursiveSplit(text, separators, chunkSize, overlap)
}

function recursiveSplit(
  text: string,
  separators: string[],
  chunkSize: number,
  overlap: number
): Chunk[] {
  if (text.length <= chunkSize) {
    return [{ id: crypto.randomUUID(), text, metadata: {} as any }]
  }

  const separator = separators.find(s => text.includes(s)) ?? ''
  const parts = text.split(separator)
  const chunks: Chunk[] = []
  let current = ''

  for (const part of parts) {
    const candidate = current ? current + separator + part : part
    if (candidate.length > chunkSize && current) {
      chunks.push({ id: crypto.randomUUID(), text: current.trim(), metadata: {} as any })
      // Overlap: keep last N chars of previous chunk
      const overlapText = current.slice(-overlap)
      current = overlapText + separator + part
    } else {
      current = candidate
    }
  }
  if (current.trim()) {
    chunks.push({ id: crypto.randomUUID(), text: current.trim(), metadata: {} as any })
  }

  return chunks
}

// Semantic chunking: split at topic boundaries using embeddings
async function semanticChunk(text: string, threshold: number = 0.3): Promise<Chunk[]> {
  const sentences = text.match(/[^.!?]+[.!?]+/g) ?? [text]
  const embeddings = await embedTexts(sentences)
  const chunks: string[][] = [[sentences[0]]]

  for (let i = 1; i < sentences.length; i++) {
    const similarity = cosineSimilarity(embeddings[i - 1], embeddings[i])
    if (similarity < threshold) {
      // Low similarity = topic boundary = new chunk
      chunks.push([sentences[i]])
    } else {
      chunks[chunks.length - 1].push(sentences[i])
    }
  }

  return chunks.map((sentences, i) => ({
    id: crypto.randomUUID(),
    text: sentences.join(' ').trim(),
    metadata: { sourceId: '', chunkIndex: i, startChar: 0, endChar: 0 }
  }))
}

Vector Search with Metadata Filtering

// Using Pinecone
import { Pinecone } from '@pinecone-database/pinecone'

const pinecone = new Pinecone()
const index = pinecone.index('documents')

// Upsert with metadata
async function indexDocument(doc: Document, chunks: Chunk[]): Promise<void> {
  const embeddings = await embedTexts(chunks.map(c => c.text))

  const vectors = chunks.map((chunk, i) => ({
    id: chunk.id,
    values: embeddings[i],
    metadata: {
      text: chunk.text,
      sourceId: doc.id,
      sourceTitle: doc.title,
      category: doc.category,
      createdAt: doc.createdAt.toISOString(),
      chunkIndex: i,
    }
  }))

  // Upsert in batches of 100
  for (let i = 0; i < vectors.length; i += 100) {
    await index.upsert(vectors.slice(i, i + 100))
  }
}

// Query with metadata filter
async function searchDocuments(
  query: string,
  filters?: { category?: string; after?: Date },
  topK: number = 10
): Promise<SearchResult[]> {
  const queryEmbedding = await embedForSearch(query)

  const filter: Record<string, any> = {}
  if (filters?.category) {
    filter.category = { $eq: filters.category }
  }
  if (filters?.after) {
    filter.createdAt = { $gte: filters.after.toISOString() }
  }

  const results = await index.query({
    vector: queryEmbedding,
    topK,
    includeMetadata: true,
    filter: Object.keys(filter).length > 0 ? filter : undefined,
  })

  return results.matches.map(m => ({
    id: m.id,
    score: m.score ?? 0,
    text: m.metadata?.text as string,
    sourceId: m.metadata?.sourceId as string,
    sourceTitle: m.metadata?.sourceTitle as string,
  }))
}

Hybrid Search (Vector + Keyword)

// Combine vector similarity with BM25 keyword matching
async function hybridSearch(
  query: string,
  topK: number = 10,
  alpha: number = 0.7  // 0.7 = 70% semantic, 30% keyword
): Promise<SearchResult[]> {
  // Run both searches in parallel
  const [vectorResults, keywordResults] = await Promise.all([
    vectorSearch(query, topK * 2),
    keywordSearch(query, topK * 2),  // BM25 via Elasticsearch
  ])

  // Reciprocal Rank Fusion (RRF)
  const k = 60  // RRF constant
  const scores = new Map<string, number>()

  vectorResults.forEach((r, rank) => {
    const current = scores.get(r.id) ?? 0
    scores.set(r.id, current + alpha * (1 / (k + rank + 1)))
  })

  keywordResults.forEach((r, rank) => {
    const current = scores.get(r.id) ?? 0
    scores.set(r.id, current + (1 - alpha) * (1 / (k + rank + 1)))
  })

  // Sort by combined score, return top K
  const allResults = [...vectorResults, ...keywordResults]
  const uniqueResults = new Map(allResults.map(r => [r.id, r]))

  return [...scores.entries()]
    .sort((a, b) => b[1] - a[1])
    .slice(0, topK)
    .map(([id, score]) => ({
      ...uniqueResults.get(id)!,
      score,
    }))
}

Reranking

// Cross-encoder reranking: slower but much more accurate than bi-encoder
async function rerankResults(
  query: string,
  results: SearchResult[],
  topK: number = 5
): Promise<SearchResult[]> {
  // Use Cohere Rerank or cross-encoder model
  const response = await fetch('https://api.cohere.ai/v1/rerank', {
    method: 'POST',
    headers: {
      Authorization: `Bearer ${process.env.COHERE_API_KEY}`,
      'Content-Type': 'application/json',
    },
    body: JSON.stringify({
      model: 'rerank-english-v3.0',
      query,
      documents: results.map(r => r.text),
      top_n: topK,
      return_documents: false,
    }),
  })

  const data = await response.json()

  return data.results.map((r: any) => ({
    ...results[r.index],
    score: r.relevance_score,
  }))
}

// RAG pipeline: retrieve → rerank → generate
async function ragQuery(query: string): Promise<string> {
  // Step 1: Retrieve candidates (broad, fast)
  const candidates = await hybridSearch(query, 20)

  // Step 2: Rerank (narrow, accurate)
  const reranked = await rerankResults(query, candidates, 5)

  // Step 3: Generate answer with context
  const context = reranked.map(r => r.text).join('\n\n')
  const response = await openai.chat.completions.create({
    model: 'gpt-4o',
    messages: [
      { role: 'system', content: `Answer based on the context below.\n\nContext:\n${context}` },
      { role: 'user', content: query },
    ],
  })

  return response.choices[0].message.content!
}

Checklist

  • Chunk size 256-1024 tokens with 10-20% overlap
  • Asymmetric embedding prefixes for query vs document
  • Metadata stored alongside vectors for pre-filtering
  • Hybrid search (vector + BM25) for best recall
  • Reranking top-N candidates with cross-encoder
  • Batch embedding calls (never one-by-one)
  • Dimension reduction (Matryoshka) for cost/speed optimization
  • Evaluation: hit rate, MRR, NDCG on test queries

Anti-Patterns

  • Embedding entire documents as single vectors (context lost, poor retrieval)
  • Fixed-size chunking ignoring sentence/paragraph boundaries
  • Only vector search without keyword fallback (misses exact matches)
  • Embedding queries and documents identically (asymmetric retrieval needs prefixes)
  • Not evaluating retrieval quality (building blind)
  • Storing embeddings without source text (can't debug or rerank)

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 328,083. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.