Experiment loop
AI software team for Claude Code - 138 agents, 295 skills, 73 hooks. Self-learning, multi-agent swarm, autonomous skill evolution.
npx -y skills add vibeeval/vibecosystem --skill experiment-loopAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Autonomous experiment loop: hypothesize > modify > test > evaluate > keep/discard > repeat. Run N experiments automatically with measurable metrics. Works for performance optimization, A/B testing, prompt engineering, and any measurable improvement task.
SKILL.md
7.1 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
Experiment Loop
Autonomous, iterative improvement inspired by Karpathy's autoresearch methodology. Define a metric, set a target, and let the loop run until the target is met or the iteration limit is reached.
The 5-Step Loop
1. HYPOTHESIZE -> Form a specific, falsifiable improvement hypothesis
2. MODIFY -> Apply the minimal code/config/prompt change
3. TEST -> Run the measurement suite (benchmarks, tests, evals)
4. EVALUATE -> Compare result against baseline and previous best
5. DECIDE -> KEEP if better, DISCARD (git stash pop --index) if worse
|
Repeat until target met OR max_iterations reached
Each iteration is atomic: one hypothesis, one change, one measurement, one decision.
Experiment Definition
Define an experiment in your task or in thoughts/EXPERIMENTS.md:
experiment:
name: "reduce-api-latency"
metric: "p95 response time (ms)"
baseline: 340
target: 200
direction: minimize # minimize | maximize
max_iterations: 10 # hard cap, never exceed
measurement_cmd: "npm run bench:api"
measurement_key: "p95" # JSON key from bench output
scope: "src/api/" # files the loop is allowed to touch
Key Fields
| Field | Description |
|---|---|
metric | Human-readable name of what you are measuring |
baseline | Measured value before any changes (run this first) |
target | Success condition -- loop exits when this is met |
direction | minimize for latency/size, maximize for coverage/score |
max_iterations | Safety cap, default 10, absolute maximum 10 |
measurement_cmd | Shell command that produces JSON with the metric value |
scope | Directories/files the loop is allowed to modify |
Safety Protocol
Before every experiment iteration:
# Save current state
git stash push -u -m "experiment-loop: iteration N baseline"
# Run experiment
# ... apply hypothesis change ...
# ... run measurement ...
# Decision
if result is better:
git stash drop # keep changes, discard stash
else:
git stash pop --index # restore exactly: staged + unstaged
Never skip the stash. Never accumulate multiple iterations without a decision checkpoint. If the measurement command fails or times out, treat it as DISCARD.
Agent Integration
The experiment loop coordinates three vibecosystem agents:
| Phase | Agent | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Hypothesize | profiler | Identify bottlenecks, suggest what to change |
| Modify | spark | Apply the focused code change |
| Test + Evaluate | verifier / tdd-guide | Run benchmarks, tests, evals and parse results |
Spawn profiler once at the start to get the initial hypothesis queue. Then run spark + verifier in tight loops per iteration.
Example Experiments
Bundle Size Reduction
experiment:
name: "optimize-bundle-size"
metric: "gzipped bundle size (KB)"
baseline: 420
target: 300
direction: minimize
max_iterations: 10
measurement_cmd: "npm run build && node scripts/measure-bundle.js"
measurement_key: "gzipped_kb"
scope: "src/"
Hypothesis queue to try in order:
- Add tree-shaking for unused lodash imports (use named imports)
- Replace
momentwithdate-fns(smaller footprint) - Move large dependencies to dynamic
import()at route boundaries - Enable
usedExports: truein webpack/rollup config - Replace
axioswith nativefetchwrapper
API Latency
experiment:
name: "reduce-api-latency"
metric: "p95 response time (ms)"
baseline: 340
target: 200
direction: minimize
max_iterations: 8
measurement_cmd: "npm run bench:api"
measurement_key: "p95"
scope: "src/api/"
Hypothesis queue:
- Add Redis cache for repeated DB reads (TTL 60s)
- Replace N+1 queries with single JOIN query
- Add connection pool sizing (
max: 20) - Move synchronous validation to async parallel (
Promise.all) - Add response compression (gzip middleware)
Test Coverage
experiment:
name: "improve-test-coverage"
metric: "line coverage (%)"
baseline: 64
target: 80
direction: maximize
max_iterations: 10
measurement_cmd: "npm test -- --coverage --json > coverage.json"
measurement_key: "coverageMap.total.lines.pct"
scope: "src/"
Prompt Engineering (LLM Eval)
experiment:
name: "improve-extraction-accuracy"
metric: "extraction F1 score"
baseline: 0.71
target: 0.85
direction: maximize
max_iterations: 10
measurement_cmd: "python eval/run_evals.py --output eval/results.json"
measurement_key: "f1"
scope: "prompts/"
Results Log Format
Append each iteration result to thoughts/EXPERIMENTS.md:
## Experiment: reduce-api-latency
Started: 2026-04-07T10:00:00Z
Baseline: 340ms | Target: 200ms | Direction: minimize
### Iteration 1
- Hypothesis: Add Redis cache for repeated DB reads
- Change: `src/api/users.ts` lines 45-67 -- wrap DB call with cache layer
- Result: 280ms (improvement: -60ms, -17.6%)
- Decision: KEEP
- Cumulative best: 280ms
### Iteration 2
- Hypothesis: Replace N+1 queries with JOIN
- Change: `src/api/users.ts` lines 89-102 -- rewrite fetchWithPosts()
- Result: 210ms (improvement: -70ms, -25%)
- Decision: KEEP
- Cumulative best: 210ms
### Iteration 3
- Hypothesis: Add connection pool sizing max:20
- Change: `src/db/pool.ts` line 12 -- max: 10 -> 20
- Result: 215ms (regression: +5ms)
- Decision: DISCARD (restored via git stash pop)
- Cumulative best: 210ms
### Final Result
- Target: 200ms | Achieved: 210ms | Status: NEAR_MISS (within 5%)
- Iterations: 3 of 10 used
- Total improvement: -38% from baseline
Iteration Limits and Exit Conditions
| Condition | Action |
|---|---|
| Target met | EXIT -- log SUCCESS, keep all accumulated changes |
| max_iterations reached | EXIT -- log PARTIAL, keep best achieved state |
| 3 consecutive DISCARDs | PAUSE -- re-run profiler for new hypothesis queue |
| Measurement command fails | DISCARD current iteration, continue loop |
| Git stash fails | STOP -- do not continue, report error |
Running the Loop
Invoke this skill by describing the experiment:
Use experiment-loop to reduce the API p95 latency from 340ms to under 200ms.
Baseline measurement: npm run bench:api
Max iterations: 8
Scope: src/api/
The loop will:
- Read any existing
thoughts/EXPERIMENTS.mdfor prior runs on the same metric - Ask
profilerfor an ordered hypothesis queue - Execute iterations with safety stashing
- Log each result immediately after measurement
- Report final state with all changes that were kept
Hard Limits
- Maximum 10 experiments per invocation (no exceptions)
- Scope must be specified -- loop will not touch files outside scope
- Measurement command must be deterministic (no unbounded network calls)
- Total wall-clock time cap: 30 minutes (prevents runaway loops)
- Never auto-merge to main -- changes stay on current branch