agentsclimarketplace

Voice of customer

Skill varunk130/ai-gtm-skill-library/revops-skills/voice-of-customer

Voice of Customer program - multi-source signal collection, theming and prioritization, evidence-to-action routing, and product / CS / marketing feedback loop closure. Use when: voice of customer, VoC program, customer feedback, NPS / CSAT / CES, qualitative theming, feedback synthesis, product feedback loop, customer insight engine.From its SKILL.md

Install
npx -y skills add varunk130/ai-gtm-skill-library --skill voice-of-customer

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

One thing to look at

  • 4 stars4 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.

SKILL.md

5.9 KB, ~1.3k tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it

Voice of Customer (ECHO Framework)

Design a Voice-of-Customer program that turns raw feedback into routed, prioritized, evidence-backed actions - not a quarterly NPS report nobody reads. ECHO replaces ad-hoc surveys with a multi-source signal pipeline that PMs, CS, and marketing all rely on.

Core Principle

VoC fails when it conflates collection with insight. A survey isn't a program. ECHO standardizes how signal is elicited, themed, prioritized, and closed - with the loop back to the customer being the most often skipped step.

The ECHO Framework

LetterStageThe Question
EElicitWhat sources are tapped, with what cadence, and how is bias controlled?
CCategorizeHow is feedback themed, tagged, and made queryable?
HHighlightWhat prioritization frame separates signal from noise?
OOperationalizeWho owns the action, what's the SLA, and how is the loop closed with the customer?

Elicitation Sources

A robust program reads from multiple channels and triangulates:

SourceQualityVolumeBias Risk
Surveys (NPS, CSAT, CES)Quantitative + open-endedHighSurvey fatigue, selection bias
Win / loss interviewsDeep qualitativeLowSelection bias toward closed deals
Customer advisory boardStrategic qualitativeVery lowTop-customer bias
Support ticketsReactive, problem-focusedVery highSkewed to broken, not desired
Product analyticsBehavioral, not statedVery highObservation without intent
CSM call notesContextual qualitativeHighCSM filter
Sales call recordingsPre-sale voiceHighSales-stage filter
Community / public reviewsHonest, publicMediumVocal-minority bias
Churn / contraction interviewsHigh-signalLowPainful but most actionable

Theming & Tagging

Without disciplined theming, VoC becomes a junk drawer. Adopt:

FieldSpec
ThemeStandardized taxonomy (refreshed quarterly, not ad-hoc)
SeverityCritical / Major / Minor - based on revenue impact, not emotion
SourceChannel of origin (survey, ticket, call, etc.)
SegmentICP segment, plan tier, motion
StagePre-sale / Onboarding / Adoption / Renewal / Churn
Evidence CountNumber of distinct customers raising the theme
Revenue at Risk / OpportunityARR exposure or expansion potential

Prioritization Frame

LensQuestion
FrequencyHow many distinct customers, by segment?
SeverityRevenue impact if unaddressed (churn risk, deal blocker)
SolvabilityEffort vs leverage of the fix
Strategic FitDoes the fix advance the platform thesis or fix a wart?
ReachWhat share of ARR or users does the change touch?

Combine into a RICE-style score, but never let the score replace judgment - leadership review is part of the process.

Operationalize: Route, Act, Close

Theme TypeOwnerSLA
Product bug / frictionPM / EngTriaged in 5 business days
Onboarding gapCS OpsUpdated playbook in 10 business days
Messaging / positioning gapProduct MarketingRefreshed asset in 15 business days
Pricing / packaging objectionPricing CouncilQuarterly review
Roadmap signalPM LeadershipRoadmap update in next planning cycle
Service qualitySupport OpsTriaged in 5 business days

Loop closure with the customer is non-negotiable. Every customer who raised a theme should hear back when a related change ships - closes trust loop and earns the next round of feedback.

Output

Save to outputs/voice-of-customer-[scope]-[YYYY-MM-DD].md

ArtifactDescription
Source PipelineInventory of channels, cadence, bias controls
Theme TaxonomyStandardized themes with definitions and examples
Prioritization SpecScoring criteria, weights, refresh cadence
Routing MapTheme types → owners → SLAs
Loop-Closure ProtocolHow and when customers are informed of action taken
VoC Operating CadenceWeekly triage, monthly review, quarterly roadmap sync
VoC DashboardTheme volume, severity distribution, action SLA performance, NPS / CSAT trend, closed-loop rate

Process

  1. Inventory sources and design the cadence; eliminate redundant surveys
  2. Standardize the taxonomy with PM, CS, and marketing co-sign
  3. Score and prioritize with a written rubric, leadership review monthly
  4. Route to owners with SLAs; track action time, not just intent
  5. Close the loop with every customer who raised an actioned theme
  6. Refresh the taxonomy quarterly - emergent themes deserve their own bucket

Tips

  1. Survey fatigue is real - cap touches per customer per quarter
  2. Triangulate sources - single-source insights are usually wrong
  3. Behavioral data beats stated preference - pair always
  4. Loop closure is the most under-invested step - and the highest-leverage one
  5. VoC is a system - one-off projects don't compound

Pairs With

  • customer-success - VoC themes feed CS risk plays and EBR agendas
  • customer-analytics - Behavioral data complements stated feedback
  • journey-architect - Stage tags align VoC with journey gates
  • enablement-forge - Updated objection handling responds to recurring VoC themes

What ships with it

Read from the repository

Just SKILL.md. No reference files, no scripts.

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 325,949. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.