Breach incident response
Skill vaquarkhan/compliance-agent-skills/skills/breach-incident-response
30 Agent Skills for deterministic USA compliance auditing of AI agents — HIPAA, NIST AI RMF, FERPA, COPPA, PCI-DSS, SOC 2, FedRAMP, CMMC, GLBA, privacy & GDPR. Presidio PHI redaction, MCP templates, Pydantic AI, VS Code & JetBrains plugins.
npx -y skills add vaquarkhan/compliance-agent-skills --skill breach-incident-responseAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 2 stars2 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Executes USA breach and security incident response—HIPAA Breach Notification Rule (45 CFR §164.400–414), HITECH 60-day notification, state breach laws, and SOC 2 CC7.4/CC7.5 incident management—for agent, MCP, and LLM-related events. Trigger when investigating suspected PHI/PII exposure, unauthorized MCP access, LLM data leakage, or preparing breach notifications. Do not use for preventive logging design (use audit-logging-integrity) or routine vulnerability scanning.
SKILL.md
8.0 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
Breach Incident Response
Overview
This skill orchestrates security incident and breach response for USA regulatory obligations:
- HIPAA Breach Notification Rule: 45 CFR §164.400–§164.414 (individual, HHS, media notification timelines)
- HITECH: 60-day notification to individuals; HHS OCR reporting
- State breach laws: variable timelines (many 30–90 days)—California, New York, etc.
- SOC 2 CC7.4/CC7.5: Incident identification, response, recovery, communication
AI-specific incidents include: unredacted ePHI sent to non-BAA LLM, MCP tool exfiltration, deanonymization abuse, compromised agent API keys, and prompt injection leading to data disclosure.
When to Use
Use this skill when:
- Suspected or confirmed unauthorized access/disclosure of ePHI, CHD, or confidential data
- LLM data leakage (raw PHI in model logs, training pipeline, vendor breach notification)
- MCP compromise (rogue tool registration, stolen OAuth tokens)
- Agent credential theft or skill tampering detected
- Preparing breach notification letters, HHS OCR reporting, state AG notifications
- Tabletop exercises for agent/MCP incident scenarios
- Post-incident root cause analysis for SOC 2 and HIPAA documentation
Do not use this skill when:
- Designing preventive audit logs (use
audit-logging-integrity) - General vendor risk questionnaires (use
vendor-third-party-risk) - Non-security operational outages without data impact (use availability runbooks)
Core Process
Execute steps in order. Contain first—do not delay containment for documentation.
Step 1: Detection and classification
- Triage alert source: SIEM, CCM, user report, vendor notification, red team.
- Classify incident type:
- Security incident (attempted access, no confirmed disclosure)
- Breach (acquisition/access/disclosure of unsecured PHI per §164.402 definitions)
- PCI incident (CHD/SAD suspected compromise)
- Assign severity and incident commander.
- Start immutable incident timeline (UTC timestamps, actor actions).
Step 2: Immediate containment
- Isolate affected systems without destroying forensic evidence:
- Revoke compromised MCP OAuth tokens and API keys
- Disable affected agent deployments; block LLM API keys
- Snapshot logs and MCP server state before changes
- Preserve evidence with SHA-256 hashes; chain of custody log.
- Do not deanonymize logs for investigation unless authorized forensic path.
Step 3: Scope and impact assessment
- Determine what data was involved:
- ePHI elements, volume, individuals affected
- CHD/SAD if payment systems involved
- Determine unsecured PHI analysis per §164.402:
- Was data encrypted per HIPAA guidance such that disclosure is impracticable?
- Risk assessment per four-factor test (§164.402(2)): nature of PHI, unauthorized person, acquisition/view, mitigation
- Use audit logs (
audit-logging-integrityartifacts) for timeline reconstruction. - Document minimum necessary findings—avoid spreading PHI in incident tickets.
Step 4: HIPAA breach determination
- If unsecured PHI involved, apply breach presumption (§164.402)—breach unless low probability of compromise documented.
- Privacy officer/legal confirms breach vs security incident.
- If breach: start notification clock (60 days to individuals per §164.404; HHS per §164.408).
Step 5: Notification workflows
HIPAA (if breach confirmed)
| Audience | Requirement | Timeline |
|---|---|---|
| Individuals | Written notice (mail or email if opted) | Without unreasonable delay, max 60 days |
| HHS OCR | Portal submission | ≤60 days; <500 individuals = annual log |
| Media | If >500 residents of a state | Without unreasonable delay, max 60 days |
- Draft notification content per §164.404(c): description, types of PHI, steps for individuals, CE contact, mitigation steps.
- Do not include unnecessary PHI in notification letters.
State laws
- Identify affected individuals' states; check state breach statutes (timeline may be shorter than HIPAA).
- Notify state AG where required (e.g., CA, NY thresholds).
SOC 2 CC7.5
- Document customer notification if incident affects service commitments or confidentiality.
- Align with contractual incident notification SLAs.
Step 6: PCI incident response (if CHD involved)
- Engage PCI forensics (PFI) if required by acquirer/brands.
- Do not store full PAN in incident docs—use tokenized references.
- Cross-notify payment brands per merchant agreement.
Step 7: Eradication and recovery
- Remove attacker access: rotate all secrets, patch vulnerabilities, remove rogue MCP tools.
- Restore from known-good baselines; re-run
compliance-as-code-governancescans. - Verify redaction gate and MCP allowlists before re-enabling agent production traffic.
Step 8: Post-incident review
- Root cause analysis: technical, process, human factors.
- Update skills, runbooks, CCM rules to prevent recurrence.
- Document lessons learned for board/management (CC1.2, CC2.2).
- Retain incident records per HIPAA documentation requirements (6 years common).
Step 9: Regulatory reporting completion
- Track notification deliveries and HHS submission confirmation.
- Archive all artifacts in encrypted evidence store with access controls.
Common Rationalizations
| Excuse the agent might generate | Required rebuttal |
|---|---|
| "It's probably not a breach—skip notification planning." | HIPAA applies breach presumption until documented four-factor risk assessment proves low probability. |
| "We contained it—notification can wait." | Notification clocks start upon discovery—delay beyond regulatory timelines is a secondary violation. |
| "Put full incident details in Slack for speed." | Incident channels must use approved secure tools—no cleartext PHI in Slack unless BAA-covered and scoped. |
| "LLM vendor deleted the data—no breach." | Vendor assurance does not replace your breach determination and notification obligations. |
| "Only 10 patients—no HHS report needed." | HHS reporting still required (annual log if <500)—individual notification still required. |
| "Forensics can wait until after we're back online." | Snapshot logs and MCP state before recovery actions destroy evidence. |
Red Flags
- Raw ePHI confirmed in non-BAA LLM vendor logs
- Deanonymization tool used anomalously without ticket correlation
- Incident commander lacks privacy/legal engagement on PHI breach
- Notification letters drafted past 60-day HIPAA deadline
- Full patient list posted in unencrypted incident spreadsheet
- MCP rogue tool remained registered during containment phase
- No HHS OCR submission tracking for reportable breach
Verification
- Incident classified (security incident vs breach) with privacy/legal sign-off
- Containment executed with forensic snapshots hashed before destructive changes
- Scope assessment completed with four-factor risk analysis documented
- HIPAA notification timeline tracked with individual/HHS/media requirements identified
- Applicable state breach notifications identified and scheduled
- SOC 2/customer contractual notifications sent per SLA
- PCI PFI engaged if CHD compromise suspected
- Eradication verified; agent/MCP production restored only after control revalidation
- Post-incident RCA completed with CCM/policy updates implemented
- All incident artifacts stored encrypted with access audit trail