Security by design
Expert AI Agent Skills for SDD, SRE, DevSecOps and Enterprise Engineering
npx -y skills add valdomirosouza/agent-skills --skill security-by-designAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
2 things to look at
- no licenseNo license file was found in the repository. Code published without one is not open source by default, so using it at work is a question for whoever answers licensing questions where you are.
- 0 stars0 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Embeds security as a structural property of systems from the spec phase — covering threat modeling (STRIDE/LINDDUN), Secure by Default, Defense in Depth, Privacy by Design (LGPD/GDPR), and Attack Surface Reduction. Use when reviewing or writing a spec for security completeness, performing threat modeling, designing access control, evaluating privacy impact (DPIA), or verifying that a system follows Security by Design principles. Also use when asked about fail-safe defaults, blast radius, CSP headers, or DPIA.
SKILL.md
6.3 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
Security by Design
Security is a structural property — not a layer added after coding. This skill governs the security architecture phase that precedes DevSecOps tooling.
Contents
- Secure SDLC: security gates per development phase
- Threat Modeling (STRIDE) → threat-modeling.md
- Secure by Default (fail-safe, deny-all, HTTP headers)
- Defense in Depth (8-layer model)
- Privacy by Design + DPIA → privacy-by-design.md
- Attack Surface Reduction
- Spec approval checklist
Secure SDLC — Gates per Phase
| Phase | Security activity | Artifact |
|---|---|---|
| Spec Draft | Threat modeling, PII classification | Security section in spec |
| Tech Review | Threat model + controls validated | Spec with security sign-off |
| Implementation | Secure coding, SAST pre-commit, no hardcoded secrets | Code with traceability header |
| Harness / Tests | Authorization tests, negative tests | Security tests in harness |
| CI/CD | SAST, SCA, secret scan, container scan | Security report in PR |
| Staging | DAST, TLS/mTLS validation | DAST report |
| Production | Artifact signature verified, SBOM validated | Signed deploy evidence |
| Operations | Anomaly monitoring, log review, SIEM | Monthly security reports |
| Deprecation | Credential revocation, data sanitization | Decommission checklist |
Secure by Default
Fail-safe principle: On failure, deny access — never permit by omission.
Examples:
Auth middleware fails? → HTTP 500, NOT bypass
Vault unavailable? → Service does NOT start (no hardcoded fallback)
Feature flag unavailable? → Feature OFF, not ON
Circuit breaker open? → Return error, do NOT retry infinitely
Deny-all defaults:
- Kubernetes NetworkPolicy: deny-all ingress/egress by default; explicit allowlist
- Security Groups: deny-all; allow by specific port and source
- WAF: block mode for OWASP Core Rule Set
- All routes require explicit permission — no public routes by default
Mandatory HTTP security headers:
Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff
X-Frame-Options: DENY
Content-Security-Policy: [defined restrictive policy]
Referrer-Policy: strict-origin-when-cross-origin
Permissions-Policy: [restrict unused browser APIs]
Cookies: Secure; HttpOnly; SameSite=Strict (or Lax when required)
CORS: Explicit origin allowlist — never wildcard (*) in production
Defense in Depth — 8 Layers
Layer 8: People & Process → Training, blameless postmortem, threat intel
Layer 7: Data → Encryption at rest, PII anonymization, DLP, retention/purge
Layer 6: Application → Input validation, authn/authz, SAST, DAST, SCA
Layer 5: Identity → MFA, RBAC, JIT access, session management, Zero Trust
Layer 4: Endpoint/Workload → Container hardening, EDR, Falco, admission controllers
Layer 3: Network → mTLS, NetworkPolicy, WAF, API Gateway, egress filtering
Layer 2: Perimeter → Firewall, VPC, Security Groups, ZTNA
Layer 1: Physical/Cloud → Cloud provider shared responsibility model
Design rule: For every critical security control, ask:
- "What happens if this control fails?"
- "Is there an independent control that still protects?"
- "Is the failure of this control detectable and alerted?"
Threat Modeling
Mandatory for: services with L1/L2 data, external API exposure, architectural changes.
STRIDE quick reference:
| Threat | Control |
|---|---|
| Spoofing | Strong authentication (OAuth 2.0/OIDC, mTLS) |
| Tampering | TLS 1.3, digital signatures, checksums |
| Repudiation | Immutable and audited logging (SIEM) |
| Information Disclosure | Encryption, PII masking, RBAC |
| Denial of Service | Rate limiting, circuit breaker, auto-scaling |
| Elevation of Privilege | Least Privilege, per-operation authorization |
Full process, DFD template, and LINDDUN for privacy → threat-modeling.md
Attack Surface Reduction
| Area | Key rules |
|---|---|
| Code | Remove unused dependencies; disable beta features in production |
| Network | Expose only necessary ports; egress allowlist for external calls |
| API | Version and deprecate old endpoints; no bulk endpoints without auth + rate limiting |
| Dependencies | Audit each new dependency; no open version ranges in production |
| Infrastructure | Remove unused cloud resources; monthly IAM permission audit |
Security by Design — Spec Approval Checklist
Before approving any spec with new service, data access, or architecture change:
### Threat Modeling
- [ ] STRIDE applied to main components
- [ ] DFD with trust boundaries documented
- [ ] High-risk threats have mapped controls
- [ ] LINDDUN applied if PII involved (or DPIA initiated)
- [ ] Residual risks accepted and documented
### Secure by Default
- [ ] System initial state is maximally restrictive
- [ ] Fail-safe defined for each critical failure point
- [ ] Security HTTP headers configured
- [ ] Debug/admin interfaces disabled in production
- [ ] Timeouts defined for all integrations
### Defense in Depth
- [ ] For each critical control: independent backup control exists?
- [ ] Control failure is detectable and alerted?
- [ ] No single point of security failure
### Privacy by Design
- [ ] Data collected is minimal for the purpose
- [ ] Legal basis (LGPD/GDPR) identified for each data type
- [ ] Retention policy defined
- [ ] Data subject rights implemented (DSAR, erasure, portability)
- [ ] DPIA completed if applicable
### Approval
| Reviewer | Role | Date | Status |
|----------|------|------|--------|
| | Engineer | | |
| | SecOps | | |
| | DPO (if L1/L2 PII) | | |