Change verification
Skill vahagn-madatyan/netsec-skills-suite/skills/change-verification
The Complete Network & Network Security Skills Suite
npx -y skills add vahagn-madatyan/netsec-skills-suite --skill change-verificationAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 0 stars0 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Pre/post change verification with baseline capture, diff analysis, and rollback decision guidance across Cisco IOS-XE/NX-OS, Juniper JunOS, and Arista EOS. Structured around a single change event lifecycle — before, during, and after — with impact classification and rollback criteria.
The file declares its own license as Apache-2.0. That is the author’s claim about this one file, and it is not the same thing as the license GitHub reports for the repository, which is listed with the other numbers below.
SKILL.md
17.4 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
Change Verification
Event-driven change verification skill for structured change windows. Guides baseline capture before a change, provides change execution safety patterns, performs post-change diff analysis, and supports rollback decision-making when unexpected deviations are detected.
This skill covers a single change event lifecycle (before → during →
after). For ongoing configuration drift detection and compliance auditing, use
the config-management skill instead.
Commands are labeled [Cisco], [JunOS], or [EOS] where syntax diverges. Unlabeled statements apply to all three vendors.
Safety Note — Read-Write Operations: This skill includes procedures that modify device state during change execution and rollback phases. Steps that write to devices are marked with ⚠️ WRITE. Always confirm authorization, change ticket approval, and maintenance window status before executing write operations. Baseline capture and post-change verification steps are read-only and safe to run at any time.
When to Use
- Planned maintenance window requiring structured pre/post verification
- Configuration change (routing policy, ACLs, interface config) with rollback plan
- Software upgrade or patch requiring before/after state comparison
- Hardware replacement (linecard, SFP, PSU) with service validation
- Circuit turn-up or decommission with adjacency and traffic verification
- Emergency change requiring rapid baseline capture and rollback readiness
- Post-change soak period with periodic re-verification against baselines
Prerequisites
- SSH or console access to all devices in the change scope (read-only for baselines; enable/configure privilege for change execution and rollback)
- Approved change ticket with documented scope, expected impact, and rollback plan including timing criteria
- Pre-identified list of devices and interfaces in the change scope
- Knowledge of expected state changes: which routes will move, which interfaces will bounce, which adjacencies will flap
- Access to a file store (flash, SCP server, or local disk) for baseline archival
- Contact information for escalation if rollback criteria are met
- See
references/checklist-templates.mdfor per-change-type prerequisites
Procedure
Follow these steps sequentially for each change event. Steps 1–2 are always read-only. Steps 3–4 include write operations. Steps 5–6 are analytical and drive the rollback decision.
Step 1: Pre-Change Baseline Capture
Capture device state snapshots before any changes. Store outputs with timestamps for post-change comparison.
Routing state:
[Cisco]
show ip route summary
show ip bgp summary
show ip ospf neighbor
[JunOS]
show route summary
show bgp summary
show ospf neighbor
[EOS]
show ip route summary
show ip bgp summary
show ip ospf neighbor
Interface and adjacency state:
All vendors — capture interface status, error counters, and neighbor tables:
[Cisco]
show interfaces summary
show cdp neighbors
show ip arp
[JunOS]
show interfaces terse
show lldp neighbors
show arp no-resolve
[EOS]
show interfaces status
show lldp neighbors
show ip arp
Configuration and hardware:
[Cisco]
show running-config
show environment all
show inventory
[JunOS]
show configuration
show chassis environment
show chassis hardware
[EOS]
show running-config
show environment all
show inventory
⚠️ WRITE — Archive baseline config to persistent storage:
[Cisco] copy running-config flash:pre-change-[ticket]-[date].cfg
[JunOS] request system configuration save /var/tmp/pre-change-[ticket].conf
[EOS] copy running-config flash:pre-change-[ticket]-[date].cfg
Record baseline metrics for comparison: total route count, BGP peer count (Established), OSPF neighbor count (Full), interface error counters, and hardware sensor readings.
Step 2: Change Scope Documentation
Before executing any changes, document:
- Change description — what configuration lines are being added, modified, or removed
- Expected impact — which peers will flap, which routes will shift, which interfaces will bounce, expected duration of disruption
- Rollback trigger criteria — specific thresholds that mandate rollback (see Threshold Tables below)
- Rollback procedure — exact commands to revert (see
references/cli-reference.mdfor vendor-specific rollback commands) - Success criteria — what "done" looks like: all baselines restored, intended changes visible, no unexpected deviations
- Soak period — how long to monitor after change before declaring success
Step 3: Change Execution
⚠️ WRITE — Apply changes using commit-confirm patterns when available.
[Cisco] — No native commit-confirm. Apply changes in config mode and
immediately verify. For bulk changes, use configure replace with a prepared
config file.
[JunOS] — Use commit confirmed [minutes] to auto-rollback if not
confirmed within the timer window. Confirm with commit after verification.
configure
# ... apply changes ...
commit confirmed 5
# ... verify ...
commit
[EOS] — Use configure session for atomic staged changes. Review before
committing.
configure session change-[ticket]
# ... apply changes ...
show session-config
commit
Staged rollout for multi-device changes: Apply to one device first, verify post-change state (Step 4), then proceed to remaining devices only after the first device passes all checks.
Step 4: Post-Change Verification
Re-capture all baseline metrics from Step 1 using identical commands. Perform a structured diff against pre-change baselines.
Key comparisons:
| Metric | Compare Against | Expected Outcome |
|---|---|---|
| Route count | Pre-change summary | Within deviation threshold |
| BGP peers Established | Pre-change peer list | All peers restored (or changed per plan) |
| OSPF neighbors Full | Pre-change neighbor list | All adjacencies restored |
| Interface errors | Pre-change counters | No new sustained errors |
| Config diff | Archived pre-change config | Only intended lines changed |
Config diff verification:
[Cisco]
show archive config differences flash:pre-change-[ticket]-[date].cfg system:running-config
[JunOS]
show | compare rollback 1
[EOS]
diff running-config flash:pre-change-[ticket]-[date].cfg
Review every line in the diff output. Classify each changed line as expected (directly part of the change plan) or unexpected (not in the change scope).
Step 5: Impact Assessment
Classify all deviations from baseline into categories:
- Expected — Intended: Changes that are the direct goal of the change window (e.g., new BGP peer appearing, old ACL removed). No action needed.
- Expected — Side Effect: Changes caused by the intended change but not the primary goal (e.g., route count increase because a new peer is now advertising). Verify they are benign.
- Unexpected — Minor: Deviations not related to the change scope but low severity (e.g., a single interface counter increment). Investigate but do not necessarily roll back.
- Unexpected — Critical: Deviations indicating collateral damage (e.g., adjacency loss on an unrelated interface, route withdrawal not in change scope). Evaluate rollback immediately.
If any deviation is classified as Unexpected — Critical, proceed directly to Step 6 rollback evaluation.
Step 6: Rollback Decision
Evaluate whether to accept the change or roll back using the criteria below.
Rollback if ANY of these conditions are true:
- Service-affecting outage on interfaces/peers outside the change scope
- Route count deviation exceeds threshold AND routes are not accounted for in the change plan
- Adjacency loss persists beyond the expected convergence window
- Hardware errors (PSU, fan, temperature) emerged that were not present in baseline
- The change did not achieve its intended effect (success criteria from Step 2 not met)
Accept if ALL of these conditions are true:
- All success criteria from Step 2 are met
- Config diff contains only expected change lines
- All baseline metrics are within acceptable deviation thresholds
- No unexpected critical deviations detected
- Soak period has elapsed without regression
⚠️ WRITE — If rolling back:
[Cisco] configure replace flash:pre-change-[ticket]-[date].cfg force
[JunOS] rollback 1 then commit
[EOS] configure replace flash:pre-change-[ticket]-[date].cfg
After rollback, re-run Step 4 post-change verification to confirm the device has returned to its pre-change state.
Threshold Tables
Acceptable Deviation Thresholds
| Metric | Normal Deviation | Warning | Rollback Trigger |
|---|---|---|---|
| IPv4 route count | ±2% of baseline | ±5% of baseline | >10% or unplanned loss |
| IPv6 route count | ±2% of baseline | ±5% of baseline | >10% or unplanned loss |
| BGP Established peers | 0 lost (unless planned) | 1 lost (if in scope) | ≥1 lost outside scope |
| OSPF Full adjacencies | 0 lost (unless planned) | Flap then recover <2 min | Lost >2 min |
| Interface errors (new) | 0 new CRC/input errors | <10 in first 5 min | Sustained >10/min |
| Interface flaps | 0 (unless planned bounce) | 1 flap on in-scope intf | Any flap outside scope |
Rollback Timing Thresholds
| Phase | Maximum Duration | Action if Exceeded |
|---|---|---|
| Change execution | Per change ticket | Pause and escalate |
| Post-change convergence | 5 minutes | Begin rollback assessment |
| Adjacency re-establishment | 2 minutes per peer | Escalate if critical peer |
| Route table stabilization | 3 minutes | Check for route oscillation |
| Soak period (minor change) | 15 minutes | Declare success or investigate |
| Soak period (major change) | 60 minutes | Declare success or investigate |
| Rollback execution | 5 minutes | Escalate to senior engineer |
Decision Trees
Post-Change Diff Contains Unexpected Lines
Config diff shows unexpected changes
├── Lines are in sections RELATED to change scope
│ ├── Side effect of intended change (e.g., auto-generated route-map sequence)
│ │ └── Classify as Expected — Side Effect → Document and accept
│ └── Unintended consequence (e.g., wrong interface affected)
│ └── Classify as Unexpected — Critical → Evaluate rollback
└── Lines are in sections UNRELATED to change scope
├── Timestamps, counters, or cosmetic changes (e.g., "Last configuration change")
│ └── Classify as Expected — Side Effect → Ignore
└── Substantive config changes (e.g., ACL modified, route-map added)
└── Classify as Unexpected — Critical → Immediate rollback
Adjacency Loss Detected Post-Change
Neighbor/peer no longer in expected state
├── Device IS in the change scope
│ ├── Interface was intentionally bounced per change plan
│ │ ├── Adjacency recovers within timing threshold
│ │ │ └── Expected — document recovery time
│ │ └── Adjacency does NOT recover within threshold
│ │ └── Investigate → Check interface state, cable, peer config
│ └── Interface was NOT intentionally bounced
│ └── Unexpected — Critical → Check for config error → Rollback if unresolved
└── Device is NOT in the change scope
├── Peer is on a device that IS in scope (far-end impact)
│ └── Expected side effect → Verify peer recovers within threshold
└── Peer is on a device NOT in scope (unrelated)
└── Unexpected — Critical → Unrelated failure, separate investigation
Route Count Deviation Outside Normal Threshold
Route count differs from baseline beyond ±2%
├── Change plan includes prefix addition or removal
│ ├── Deviation direction matches plan (added routes = count increase)
│ │ └── Expected — verify exact prefix matches plan
│ └── Deviation direction opposes plan (planned addition but count decreased)
│ └── Unexpected — Critical → Check BGP/OSPF process, peer state
├── Change plan does NOT include routing changes
│ ├── Deviation is <5% and routes are from in-scope device peers
│ │ └── Warning — likely convergence artifact → Monitor for 3 min
│ └── Deviation is >5% OR routes from out-of-scope sources
│ └── Unexpected — Critical → Evaluate rollback
└── Route oscillation detected (count fluctuating)
└── Unexpected — Critical → Routing loop or flapping → Immediate rollback
Report Template
# Change Verification Report — [Ticket ID]
## Change Summary
- **Ticket:** [ID]
- **Date/Time:** [Start] — [End]
- **Devices:** [list]
- **Change Type:** [routing | switching | security | upgrade | other]
- **Executed By:** [name/team]
## Pre-Change Baseline
- Route count (IPv4/IPv6): [count]
- BGP peers Established: [count]
- OSPF adjacencies Full: [count]
- Interface errors (notable): [any]
- Config archived to: [location]
## Change Execution
- Method: [manual | commit-confirm | session | replace]
- Duration: [minutes]
- Issues during execution: [none | description]
## Post-Change Verification
- Route count (IPv4/IPv6): [count] (Δ [change])
- BGP peers Established: [count] (Δ [change])
- OSPF adjacencies Full: [count] (Δ [change])
- Interface errors (new): [count]
- Config diff lines: [expected: N, unexpected: N]
## Impact Assessment
- Expected — Intended: [list]
- Expected — Side Effect: [list]
- Unexpected — Minor: [list or none]
- Unexpected — Critical: [list or none]
## Decision
- **Result:** [ACCEPTED | ROLLED BACK | ESCALATED]
- **Rationale:** [reason]
- **Soak period:** [duration, outcome]
## Action Items
- [ ] [any follow-up tasks]
Troubleshooting
Baseline capture commands fail or return incomplete output
- Verify SSH session stability — long command outputs may be truncated by
terminal buffer limits. Use
terminal length 0[Cisco/EOS] orset cli screen-length 0[JunOS] before capture. - Check device CPU — high CPU may cause CLI timeouts. Run
show processes cpu[Cisco] /show system processes extensive[JunOS] /show processes top[EOS] to verify. - If archival to remote storage fails, save to local flash as fallback and note the location for later retrieval.
Config diff shows excessive noise
- Filter out timestamp and comment lines that change on every config display
(e.g.,
! Last configuration change at ...). - On [JunOS],
show | compare rollback 1gives clean structured diffs. On [Cisco],show archive config differencesmay include line-order differences that are not real changes — focus on substantive config lines. - Use
references/checklist-templates.mdchecklists to focus verification on change-relevant sections rather than full config comparison.
Adjacency does not recover after expected bounce
- Check interface state:
show interfaces [intf]— look fordown/downvsup/downto distinguish physical vs protocol issues. - Verify the peer device accepted the change — a mismatched configuration on both sides of a link (e.g., mismatched OSPF area, BGP ASN) will prevent adjacency formation.
- Check for hold-timer expiry: OSPF default dead interval is 40s; BGP default hold time is 180s. Wait at least one full timer cycle before escalating.
Rollback command fails or produces unexpected state
- [Cisco]
configure replacerequires the IOS archive feature to be enabled. If unavailable, manually reverse the config changes line by line. - [JunOS]
rollback Nmay fail if the commit history has been cleared or the device has rebooted since the baseline commit. Useshow system committo verify available rollback points. - [EOS]
configure replacerequires the replacement file to be a complete config, not a partial fragment. Verify the archived file is a fullshow running-configcapture. - After any rollback, re-run the full post-change verification (Step 4) to confirm the device has returned to its pre-change state.
Change window time exceeded before verification completes
- Prioritize critical services: check routing adjacencies and interface states first, defer detailed config diff analysis to after the window if services are healthy.
- If the soak period must be shortened, document the reduced observation window and schedule a follow-up verification at the next opportunity.
- Escalate if service impact is detected and the change window has closed — do not delay rollback due to window constraints if there is active service degradation.