agentsclimarketplace

Empty states

Skill Uxcel-Lab/product-skills/ux/screens/empty-states

Design or critique empty states — first-use screens, cleared states, no-results pages, and 404s that explain why the screen is empty and guide the next action instead of dead-ending. Trigger when the user asks to design or review an empty state, blank screen, zero-data view, first-run dashboard, no-results page, or 404 page.From its SKILL.md

Install
npx -y skills add Uxcel-Lab/product-skills --skill empty-states

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

One thing to look at

  • 5 stars5 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.

What its file declares

Copied from the file, not written here

The file declares its own license as MIT. That is the author’s claim about this one file, and it is not the same thing as the license GitHub reports for the repository, which is listed with the other numbers below.

SKILL.md

7.5 KB, ~1.7k tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it

Empty States Skill

How this skill behaves (read first)

This is a generative skill. The default failure mode is the dead screen: "No tasks found." — a blank dead-end at exactly the moment a user is newest, most confused, or most blocked. Every empty state is secretly one of the product's highest-leverage screens: it's onboarding (first use), reassurance (cleared), or recovery (no results / 404). The opposite failure exists too — an "empty" screen so stuffed with text, illustration, and three CTAs that it's no longer calm. This skill gates:

  1. Establish why the screen is empty — the cause picks the pattern.
  2. Apply the always-true core — explain + guide, never blame, stay calm.
  3. Surface the embellishment decisions (illustration, CTAs, humor) with trade-offs.

Then it hands off to ux-heuristics-audit, ux-accessibility-audit, ux-aesthetics-audit, and ux-microcopy-audit for validation.


Step 0 — Establish why the screen is empty

The cause picks the pattern:

  • First use — the user hasn't created anything yet. This is onboarding's last mile: explain what lives here and make the first action effortless ("Add your first task").
  • Cleared / completed — the user emptied it themselves (inbox zero, done list). Tone shifts to positive reinforcement: "You're all caught up!" + a low-pressure next step.
  • No results — a search/filter came up empty. Not really "empty" — it's a recovery moment: spelling check, search tips, popular categories, recent searches (align with ux-search's no-dead-ends rule).
  • Error / 404 — something's missing or broken. Explain plainly, no jargon, no blame, and route back to safety (homepage, popular content).

Also establish platform and brand voice — they bound illustration style and whether humor is safe.


The always-apply core (correct for almost every case)

Explain + guide — the two jobs every empty state has

  • Say why it's empty, specifically. ❌ "No tasks found" ✅ "You're all caught up! Add a new task to stay productive." Clarity plus encouragement, never a bare negation.
  • Always offer a next step. Even a basic informational empty state hints at what to do ("Your inbox is empty. Start by composing a new message"). An empty state with no path forward is a defect.
  • Action empty states pair message and CTA: the button continues the sentence — "Your cart is empty. Start shopping now!" → [Shop now]. Secondary paths (docs, examples) can live as links in the copy.
  • Never blame the user — especially on no-results and 404 pages. The system explains what happened and offers routes, not fault.

CTAs that actually move users

  • Specific, action-oriented labels: "Add your first task," "Explore features" — not "OK" or "Get started" floating contextless.
  • One primary action. If two are warranted (template vs. custom), the recommended path is visually primary and the alternative clearly secondary — never two equal buttons.

Calm over clutter

  • An empty screen is not a billboard. Concise microcopy + minimal visuals; every element nudges toward the user's primary goal. First-run dashboards especially: guide, don't carpet-bomb with tips, tours, and banners at once.

The context-dependent decisions (surface, don't auto-apply)

DecisionApply whenAvoid / adapt whenDefault recommendation
IllustrationIt communicates the state (sun-behind-clouds for no weather data) and fits brand personalityDecoration that adds noise or delays comprehension; inconsistent styleRelevant, on-brand, subordinate to the message
Humor / personalityBrands where playfulness fits; low-frustration moments (cleared states)Error/404 contexts for serious products; users mid-task and blockedWarmth always; jokes only where frustration is low
Second CTAA genuine alternative path (template vs. custom)Choice paralysis on a screen meant to unblockOne primary; secondary visually subordinate
Educational content (docs links, demos)Complex products where the first action needs contextSimple actions that need no manualLink in copy, not a competing button
Sample/demo dataDashboards where showing the value beats describing itWhen fake data could be mistaken for realClearly-labeled sample content as a preview
404 navigation aidsLinks to homepage + popular content; search boxA bare "page not found"Illustration + plain explanation + ≥2 routes onward

Validate the result (orchestration)

Hand-offs name each lens by its installable skill name. Invoke one only if that skill is installed; if it isn't, this skill's own core already carries these rules — proceed without it rather than blocking.

After generating or revising, hand the result to the audit lenses rather than declaring it done. These are candidate lenses — posture is set by docs/orchestration-policy.md, or route the whole thing through ux-design-review. Here, heuristics and microcopy are Tier A (auto-run); accessibility and aesthetics are Tier B (offered) — under an existing design system aesthetics is suppressed and accessibility narrows to usage. If the user invoked this skill for one specific thing, respect that scope.

  • ux-heuristics-audit (Tier A) — visibility of system status (why is it empty?), error recovery quality, match to user expectations per state type.
  • ux-accessibility-audit (Tier B — offer; narrow under a design system) — illustration alt text, CTA contrast and target size, message readability.
  • ux-aesthetics-audit (Tier B — offer; suppress under a design system) — calm-vs-clutter balance, illustration consistency with the product's visual language.
  • ux-microcopy-audit (Tier A) — this skill lives or dies on copy: explanation specificity, CTA labels, tone (encouraging, never blaming).

If the audits surface a conflict (e.g., brand wants a big illustration vs. fast comprehension), resolve back toward the primary task: the user hit this screen wanting to do something — get them doing it.


Common do/don't patterns

❌ Don't✅ Do
"No data available." and nothing elseWhy it's empty + what to do next, every time
Generic "No tasks found""You're all caught up! Add a new task to stay productive"
Empty cart with no path"Your cart is empty. Start shopping now!" + [Shop now]
Blaming phrasing on no-results ("You entered a bad query")Spelling tips, search suggestions, popular categories
Jargon-filled 404Plain words + illustration + links onward
Three equal CTAs on a first-run screenOne primary action; alternatives subordinate
Tutorial walls on an empty dashboardMinimal copy + one clear first step (+ labeled sample data if helpful)
Random cute illustration everywhereRelevant, on-brand visuals that carry meaning
Ship without checkingHand off to heuristics + accessibility + aesthetics + microcopy

Source lessons (Uxcel)

What ships with it

Read from the repository

Just SKILL.md. No reference files, no scripts.

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 326,764. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.