agentsclimarketplace

Modals and dialogs

Skill Uxcel-Lab/product-skills/ux/components/modals-and-dialogs

Design or critique modals, dialogs, alerts, popovers, and bottom sheets — gate WHEN interrupting users is justified, then apply dismissal, title/button, and focus best practices. Trigger when the user asks to design or review a modal, dialog, popup, overlay, confirmation, alert, permission request, lightbox, or bottom sheet — or asks whether something should be a modal at all.From its SKILL.md

Install
npx -y skills add Uxcel-Lab/product-skills --skill modals-and-dialogs

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

One thing to look at

  • 5 stars5 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.

What its file declares

Copied from the file, not written here

The file declares its own license as MIT. That is the author’s claim about this one file, and it is not the same thing as the license GitHub reports for the repository, which is listed with the other numbers below.

SKILL.md

9.4 KB, ~2.1k tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it

Modals & Dialogs Skill

How this skill behaves (read first)

This is a generative skill. The default failure modes: interrupting for everything (modals for success messages, tips, newsletters — attention spent like it's free), trapping users (no visible close, no Esc, stacked modals), and vague choices ("Are you sure?" → Yes/No). A modal takes the whole interface hostage — that's justified only in high-stakes moments, and the price is paid back with crystal-clear purpose and effortless exit. This skill gates:

  1. Gate the interruption itself — is a modal even justified here? The most important decision happens before any design.
  2. Apply the always-true core — purpose in the title, explicit buttons, easy dismissal, focus management.
  3. Surface the type and timing decisions (popup/fullscreen/popover/bottom sheet, permission priming) with trade-offs.

Then it hands off to ux-heuristics-audit, ux-accessibility-audit, ux-aesthetics-audit, ux-microcopy-audit, and ux-dark-patterns-audit for validation.


Step 0 — Gate the interruption (the decision that matters most)

A modal blocks everything. It earns that only for high-stakes moments:

  • Confirming destructive or irreversible actions (delete account, discard draft) — show impact ("12 files will be deleted").
  • Critical errors or warnings (system restart, unsaved changes at risk).
  • Information required to continue the current task (login to save, payment details).

Everything else — success messages, tips, FYIs, promotions — uses non-modal patterns: inline messages, toasts, banners, popovers. Also establish:

  • Who triggers it? User-initiated modals (clicked a button) are expected; system-initiated modals (timed popups, upgrade nags) interrupt without warning — avoid unless truly urgent (session expiry, critical update).
  • Timing — never interrupt high-stakes flows in progress (mid-checkout is the classic crime).
  • Platform — desktop alert vs. iOS alert / Android dialog conventions; bottom/action sheets for mobile action lists.

If the content fails the high-stakes test, stop designing a modal and recommend the inline/toast alternative.


The always-apply core (correct for every modal that survives the gate)

Purpose, title, buttons

  • The title carries the whole message — users skim or skip body text. "Discard draft?" not "Warning." Body text adds the why and context; nothing vital lives only in the body.
  • Explicit button labels answering the title: ❌ "Yes" / "No" / "Cancel" ✅ "Discard draft" / "Keep editing." Users must know what each button does without reading anything else.
  • Maximum two action buttons. A third ("Learn more") leaks users out of the decision.
  • Never blame or shame in opt-out labels ("No thanks, I hate saving money" → dark-patterns flag).

Dismissal is a right, not a feature

  • Multiple visible exits: Close/Cancel button + the × in the corner + Esc on desktop / Back on mobile.
  • Click/tap outside closes it — when no entered data would be lost; suppress only when dismissal would destroy work.
  • Never stack modals. A modal on a modal is a hostage situation with extra steps.

Focus and attention mechanics

  • Dark overlay behind the modal — focuses attention, blocks outside interaction, doubles as a close target.
  • Keyboard focus moves into the modal on open (onto the primary action); all controls keyboard-reachable.
  • Centered placement — dead-center on mobile; horizontally centered and slightly above center on desktop (stable under window resizing).
  • Critical alerts look critical: red accents and an alert icon for destructive/urgent confirmations, so habituated users don't dismiss on autopilot.

The context-dependent decisions (surface, don't auto-apply)

DecisionApply whenAvoid / adapt whenDefault recommendation
Popup modalThe standard high-stakes interrupt over dimmed contentContent that needs a whole pageDefault modal type
Fullscreen modalComplex focused tasks: multi-step forms, payments, T&Cs, mobile spotlight momentsSimple confirmations (overkill); anything users may need to escape fast — make dismissal obviousOnly when the task genuinely fills a screen
PopoverExtra detail/options anchored to an element, without blocking the pageCritical information (too easy to miss)The non-modal default for contextual help
LightboxImage/video magnification with navigation, captions, zoomNon-media contentMedia-rich products only
Bottom / action sheet (mobile)Lists of related actions or share targets, per OS conventionCritical confirmations (use an alert/dialog)Android bottom sheet / iOS action sheet for action lists
Success feedbackInline or on-page statesSuccess modals — interrupting to say "it worked"Modal success only if users must acknowledge before continuing
Permission requestsIn context, at the moment the feature needs it; primed with a pre-permission explainer; one permission at a time; a compelling reason (+81% grant likelihood)At first launch, in batches, with "Recommended" pressure labels, or mid-taskPrime → contextual ask → graceful path to reverse a denial
System-initiated modalsTruly urgent: session expiry, security, data lossSubscription nags, timed promos, rating begsAlmost never; use banners/badges instead

Validate the result (orchestration)

Hand-offs name each lens by its installable skill name. Invoke one only if that skill is installed; if it isn't, this skill's own core already carries these rules — proceed without it rather than blocking.

After generating or revising, hand the result to the audit lenses rather than declaring it done. These are candidate lenses — posture is set by docs/orchestration-policy.md, or route the whole thing through ux-design-review. Here, heuristics, microcopy, and dark-patterns are Tier A (auto-run); accessibility, aesthetics, and mobile-responsiveness are Tier B (offered) — under an existing design system aesthetics is suppressed and accessibility narrows to usage; mobile-responsiveness applies only on mobile. If the user invoked this skill for one specific thing, respect that scope.

  • ux-heuristics-audit (Tier A) — user control and freedom (exits), error prevention (explicit confirmations), match to expectations (platform conventions).
  • ux-accessibility-audit (Tier B — offer; narrow under a design system) — focus trap correctness, keyboard dismissal, screen-reader announcement, contrast of overlay content.
  • ux-aesthetics-audit (Tier B — offer; suppress under a design system) — modal visual hierarchy, overlay treatment, alert-styling restraint.
  • ux-microcopy-audit (Tier A) — title clarity, button explicitness, body brevity, permission-reason wording.
  • ux-dark-patterns-audit (Tier A) — this skill's interruptions are prime dark-pattern territory: nagging system modals, shame opt-outs, permission pressure, hard-to-find dismissal.
  • ux-mobile-responsiveness-audit (Tier B — offer; applies only on mobile) — when the context is mobile: sheet conventions, dismissal gestures, fullscreen behavior.

If the audits surface a conflict (e.g., growth wants a signup modal on page load vs. user control), resolve back toward the primary task: the user was doing something — the modal must either protect that task or get out of its way.


Common do/don't patterns

❌ Don't✅ Do
Modal for a success message or a tipInline state / toast; modals for high-stakes only
Timed subscription popup mid-readingUser-initiated modals; system interrupts only for urgency
"Are you sure?" → Yes / No"Discard draft?" → "Discard" / "Keep editing"
Three+ buttons including "Learn more"Two actions, aligned to the title
No × , no Esc, no outside clickClose button + Esc/Back + outside click (when safe)
Modal opens on top of another modalOne modal at a time, ever
Vital info buried in body textThe title carries the message
Permission batch on first launchPrimed, contextual, one-at-a-time requests with reasons
"No thanks, I like missing out"Neutral, respectful opt-out labels
Focus stays on the page behindFocus moves into the modal, onto the primary action
Ship without checkingHand off to heuristics + accessibility + aesthetics + microcopy + dark-patterns

Source lessons (Uxcel)

What ships with it

Read from the repository

Just SKILL.md. No reference files, no scripts.

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 326,764. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.