agentsclimarketplace

Interview cue sheet writer

Skill ur-grue/autopunk-media-skills/skills/radio-audio/scripting/interview-cue-sheet-writer

Produces a formatted radio interview cue sheet with scripted intro, key questions, suggested follow-ups, factual reference points, and a clean out-cue for the presenter.From its SKILL.md

Install
npx -y skills add ur-grue/autopunk-media-skills --skill interview-cue-sheet-writer

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

One thing to look at

  • 16 stars16 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.

SKILL.md

7.7 KB, ~1.6k tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it

Interview Cue Sheet Writer

What This Skill Does

Produces a formatted radio interview cue sheet with scripted intro, key questions, suggested follow-ups, factual reference points, and a clean out-cue for the presenter.

When To Use This Skill

  • A presenter needs a structured document to run a live or pre-recorded studio interview
  • You have a guest booked and need to brief the presenter on background, angles, and likely defensive answers
  • An interview needs to serve a specific editorial purpose (news-breaking, human interest, accountability, expert explanation) and the questions need to be shaped accordingly
  • A producer is preparing a presenter who has little prior knowledge of the subject

What You Need To Provide

Required: Guest name and role, the topic or news hook for the interview, and the interview's editorial purpose (e.g. accountability, explanation, human interest, debate). Optional: Programme name and tone, interview duration, any sensitive areas to handle carefully, background notes or pre-interview research, specific claims to challenge, and whether the interview is live or pre-recorded.

How the Assistant Approaches This

  1. Establishes the interview's editorial purpose and uses it to sequence the questions — opening questions build rapport and establish context; mid-interview questions go to the core of the story; the final section handles accountability, challenge, or forward-looking angles
  2. Writes 6–10 primary questions in plain spoken English, each focused on a single point; adds 2–3 follow-up prompts per key question to handle likely deflections or non-answers
  3. Provides a scripted intro (20–30 seconds) that the presenter can read verbatim, a factual reference card (3–5 bullet points) for use mid-interview, and a clean out-cue thanking the guest and returning to the programme

Output Format

A single A4-equivalent document divided into four sections: SCRIPTED INTRO, FACTUAL REFERENCE CARD, QUESTIONS, and OUT-CUE. Questions are numbered and bold; follow-ups are indented in plain text below each. Factual reference card uses bullet points. Document includes a header showing guest name, role, interview duration, and programme name. Total length: 400–600 words. Tone of the questions matches the stated editorial purpose — probing but fair for accountability, curious and warm for human interest.

Quality Criteria

  • Opening question is accessible and open — it does not presuppose facts or put the guest immediately on the defensive
  • At least one question directly addresses the news hook or the reason the guest was booked
  • Follow-up prompts anticipate the most likely deflection or non-answer and provide a redirect
  • Factual reference card contains only verified facts provided in the input — no invented figures or statistics
  • Out-cue is a natural spoken close that does not sound abrupt or formulaic
  • Questions are in spoken English — no legalese, no compound questions, no double negatives

Example

Input

Programme: "Drive Time" — afternoon news-feature show, accessible and engaged tone Guest: Dr. Amara Osei, consultant in emergency medicine Topic: Record A&E waiting times published today — national figures show one in four patients waiting over 8 hours Editorial purpose: Explanation and mild accountability — what is causing this, what could fix it, who is responsible Interview duration: 6 minutes Sensitive area: Do not imply the NHS is failing; frame around systemic pressure, not individual failure

Output


DRIVE TIME — INTERVIEW CUE SHEET Guest: Dr. Amara Osei, Consultant in Emergency Medicine Topic: Record A&E Waiting Times Duration: 6 minutes (live) Date: [insert broadcast date]


SCRIPTED INTRO (~25 secs)

New figures out today show that one in four patients in England waited more than eight hours in A&E last month — the highest proportion on record. Those are the kinds of delays that can mean the difference between a good outcome and a very difficult one. Joining me now is Dr. Amara Osei, a consultant in emergency medicine. Dr. Osei — welcome to the programme.


FACTUAL REFERENCE CARD

  • National A&E figures published today: 25% of patients waited more than 8 hours (record high)
  • Target: 95% of patients to be seen within 4 hours (this target has not been met nationally since 2015)
  • Ambulance handover delays are a key contributing factor — average handover time now 45 minutes
  • "Corridor care" — treating patients in corridors due to lack of beds — was cited in today's report
  • Discharge delays (patients medically fit to leave but with no social care package in place) account for approximately 14% of occupied beds

QUESTIONS

1. When you see those figures — one in four patients waiting more than eight hours — what does that mean in practice for the people in your department?

  • Follow-up: Can you give us a sense of what eight hours in an A&E waiting room actually looks like for a patient?
  • Follow-up: Is this a situation that has crept up on the system, or did it feel like it arrived suddenly?

2. The report highlights ambulance handover delays as a significant factor. For listeners who don't know what that means — can you explain what happens at a handover, and why it takes so long?

  • Follow-up: So the ambulance crew cannot leave until they hand the patient to a nurse — and if there's no nurse free, the ambulance just waits outside?

3. There's a concept in today's report called "corridor care." Is that as stark as it sounds?

  • Follow-up: How do you, as a clinician, manage that situation — both for the patient and for your own team?

4. A lot of people listening will be thinking: where do you start fixing this? What is the single pressure point that, if it were resolved, would make the biggest difference?

  • Follow-up: The discharge delay issue — that's about social care, not NHS care. Is that a problem emergency medicine can solve from within?
  • Follow-up: If you were briefing the Health Secretary for five minutes tomorrow, what would you say?

5. For someone listening who may need to use A&E — perhaps tonight, perhaps next week — what is your honest advice?

  • Follow-up: Are there situations where you'd say: don't come to A&E, go somewhere else instead?

OUT-CUE

Dr. Amara Osei, consultant in emergency medicine — thank you very much for joining us on Drive Time this afternoon. We'll have more on today's NHS figures after the traffic update, coming up.


Known Limitations

  • Follow-up questions are based on typical interview patterns and common deflections; a guest with an unusual or highly technical response may not be well-covered by the suggested redirects
  • Cannot anticipate breaking news that emerges after the cue sheet is generated — presenters should always check for late developments before going live
  • The factual reference card only contains facts explicitly provided in the input; the skill does not conduct independent research or verify figures
  • For very short interviews (under 3 minutes), the full question set will need pruning — the skill will not automatically reduce questions to fit a 2-minute slot

Related Skills

What ships with it: 1 file

4.2 KB alongside SKILL.md

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 326,834. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.