Gh actionlint
(1) Rigorous notes and solutions for core algorithms and computing fundamentals broken down for deliberate practice with Anki. (2) A monorepo of libraries and CLI tools I use regularly as a software engineer.
npx -y skills add Unique-Divine/jiyuu --skill gh-actionlintAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 6 stars6 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Validate GitHub Actions workflow YAML with actionlint when editing files under `.github/workflows/`, checking CI workflow syntax, diagnosing GitHub Actions expression or schema errors, or when the user asks to lint/check Actions workflows. Prefer `bunx github-actionlint` when `bun` is available and fall back to `npx --yes github-actionlint`; use this proactively after modifying GitHub Actions workflows.
SKILL.md
3.2 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
GH Actionlint
Purpose
Use actionlint to catch GitHub Actions workflow mistakes before CI does:
YAML syntax errors, invalid workflow keys, expression mistakes, bad needs
references, invalid triggers, and other common Actions-specific issues.
Generic YAML linters are useful for indentation, but they do not understand GitHub Actions semantics. Prefer this skill whenever the file is a GitHub Actions workflow.
When To Use
Use this skill when:
- The user asks to check, lint, validate, or debug GitHub Actions workflows.
- You modify files under
.github/workflows/. - CI fails with workflow parsing, expression, trigger,
needs, matrix, or Actions schema errors. - The user asks whether a workflow step shape is valid, such as an unnamed
run:step.
Workflow
- Work from the repository root when possible.
- Identify the workflow targets:
- If the user named specific files, check those files.
- Otherwise, check
.github/workflows/.
- Choose the runner:
- If
bunis available, usebunx github-actionlint. - Otherwise, if
npxis available, usenpx --yes github-actionlint. - If neither exists, tell the user that
bunornpxis needed.
- If
- Run actionlint.
- Report whether the workflows passed. If there are failures, quote the relevant actionlint messages and suggest the smallest fix.
Commands
Check all workflows:
if command -v bun >/dev/null 2>&1; then
bunx github-actionlint .github/workflows/
elif command -v npx >/dev/null 2>&1; then
npx --yes github-actionlint .github/workflows/
else
echo "need bun or npx on PATH" >&2
exit 1
fi
Check specific workflow files:
if command -v bun >/dev/null 2>&1; then
bunx github-actionlint .github/workflows/tests.yaml
elif command -v npx >/dev/null 2>&1; then
npx --yes github-actionlint .github/workflows/tests.yaml
else
echo "need bun or npx on PATH" >&2
exit 1
fi
Use -color -verbose when extra diagnostics are helpful:
bunx github-actionlint -color -verbose .github/workflows/
Reporting Style
Keep the result concise:
- Say which command ran.
- Say whether actionlint passed.
- For failures, include file path, line/column if provided, and the exact rule message.
- Distinguish Actions validation errors from unrelated shellcheck warnings when actionlint reports both.
- Avoid adding
github-actionlinttopackage.jsonunless the user explicitly wants it pinned as a project dependency.
Test Prompts
Use these prompts to sanity-check the skill behavior:
- "I changed
.github/workflows/tests.yaml; can you check if the workflow YAML is valid?" - "While you're editing the GitHub Action, please run the action linter before you finish."
- "CI says my workflow has an unexpected key under
push; can you diagnose the Actions YAML?"