agentsclimarketplace

Code review checklist

Skill ulpi-io/plugin-marketplace/plugins/sickn33/skills/code-review-checklist

Code review guidelines covering code quality, security, and best practices.From its SKILL.md

Install
npx -y skills add ulpi-io/plugin-marketplace --skill code-review-checklist

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

2 things to look at

  • no licenseNo license file was found in the repository. Code published without one is not open source by default, so using it at work is a question for whoever answers licensing questions where you are.
  • 1 stars1 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.

SKILL.md

2.5 KB, 621 tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it

Code Review Checklist

Quick Review Checklist

Correctness

  • Code does what it's supposed to do
  • Edge cases handled
  • Error handling in place
  • No obvious bugs

Security

  • Input validated and sanitized
  • No SQL/NoSQL injection vulnerabilities
  • No XSS or CSRF vulnerabilities
  • No hardcoded secrets or sensitive credentials
  • AI-Specific: Protection against Prompt Injection (if applicable)
  • AI-Specific: Outputs are sanitized before being used in critical sinks

Performance

  • No N+1 queries
  • No unnecessary loops
  • Appropriate caching
  • Bundle size impact considered

Code Quality

  • Clear naming
  • DRY - no duplicate code
  • SOLID principles followed
  • Appropriate abstraction level

Testing

  • Unit tests for new code
  • Edge cases tested
  • Tests readable and maintainable

Documentation

  • Complex logic commented
  • Public APIs documented
  • README updated if needed

AI & LLM Review Patterns (2025)

Logic & Hallucinations

  • Chain of Thought: Does the logic follow a verifiable path?
  • Edge Cases: Did the AI account for empty states, timeouts, and partial failures?
  • External State: Is the code making safe assumptions about file systems or networks?

Prompt Engineering Review

// ❌ Vague prompt in code
const response = await ai.generate(userInput);

// ✅ Structured & Safe prompt
const response = await ai.generate({
  system: "You are a specialized parser...",
  input: sanitize(userInput),
  schema: ResponseSchema
});

Anti-Patterns to Flag

// ❌ Magic numbers
if (status === 3) { ... }

// ✅ Named constants
if (status === Status.ACTIVE) { ... }

// ❌ Deep nesting
if (a) { if (b) { if (c) { ... } } }

// ✅ Early returns
if (!a) return;
if (!b) return;
if (!c) return;
// do work

// ❌ Long functions (100+ lines)
// ✅ Small, focused functions

// ❌ any type
const data: any = ...

// ✅ Proper types
const data: UserData = ...

Review Comments Guide

// Blocking issues use 🔴
🔴 BLOCKING: SQL injection vulnerability here

// Important suggestions use 🟡
🟡 SUGGESTION: Consider using useMemo for performance

// Minor nits use 🟢
🟢 NIT: Prefer const over let for immutable variable

// Questions use ❓
❓ QUESTION: What happens if user is null here?

What ships with it

Read from the repository

Just SKILL.md. No reference files, no scripts.

Gives 0 of the 12 instructions most code review skills give in 621 tokens

Counted across 668 of the 814 authors here whose files we hold, read 2026-09-06

  • Provide technical reasoning when pushing backin 84 of 668, across 70 files
  • Fix critical issues immediatelyin 77 of 668, across 60 files
  • Dispatch a code reviewer subagentin 76 of 668, across 59 files
  • Fix important issues before proceedingin 73 of 668, across 56 files
  • Ask for clarification on unclear itemsin 68 of 668, across 56 files
  • Verify feedback against codebase before implementationin 66 of 668, across 55 files
  • Implement fixes one at a timein 64 of 668, across 53 files
  • Test each fix individuallyin 62 of 668, across 51 files
  • Restate technical requirements in own wordsin 57 of 668, across 46 files
  • Reply to inline comments in the specific threadin 51 of 668, across 40 files
  • Note minor issues for laterin 49 of 668, across 34 files
  • Group findings by severityin 48 of 668, across 47 files

Said here and by no other author read

  • Write unit tests for new code

Grouped from the skills themselves: near-identical wordings counted once, and counted by distinct author, so one author publishing three of these counts once. Length counted with cl100k_base; the agent that loads this file may tokenize it differently.

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 325,949. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.