agentsclimarketplace

Pr validate

Skill ulpi-io/plugin-marketplace/plugins/boshu2/skills/pr-validate

PR-specific validation: isolation, upstream alignment, quality, scope creep. Triggers: "validate PR", "pr validation", "check PR scope", "scope creep check", "isolation check".From its SKILL.md

Install
npx -y skills add ulpi-io/plugin-marketplace --skill pr-validate

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

2 things to look at

  • no licenseNo license file was found in the repository. Code published without one is not open source by default, so using it at work is a question for whoever answers licensing questions where you are.
  • 1 stars1 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.

What its file declares

Copied from the file, not written here

The file declares its own license as MIT. That is the author’s claim about this one file, and it is not the same thing as the license GitHub reports for the repository, which is listed with the other numbers below.

SKILL.md

4.6 KB, ~1.0k tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it

PR Validate Skill

PR-specific validation that ensures changes are clean, focused, and ready.

Overview

Validates a PR branch for submission readiness by checking isolation, upstream alignment, scope containment, and quality gates.

Input: Branch name (default: current branch)

When to Use:

  • Before running $pr-prep
  • After $pr-implement completes
  • When suspicious of scope creep

Workflow

1.  Branch Discovery     -> Identify branch and upstream
2.  Upstream Alignment   -> FIRST: Check rebase status (BLOCKING)
3.  CONTRIBUTING.md      -> Verify compliance (BLOCKING)
4.  Isolation Check      -> Single type, thematic files
5.  Scope Check          -> Verify changes match intended scope
6.  Quality Gate         -> Tests, linting (non-blocking)
7.  Report Generation    -> Summary with pass/fail

Phase 2: Upstream Alignment (BLOCKING - CHECK FIRST)

# Fetch latest upstream
git fetch origin main

# How many commits behind?
BEHIND=$(git rev-list --count HEAD..origin/main)
echo "Behind upstream: $BEHIND commits"
CheckPass Criteria
Minimal divergence< 20 commits behind
No conflictsMerge/rebase would succeed

Phase 4: Isolation Check (BLOCKING)

# Commit type analysis
git log --oneline main..HEAD | sed 's/^[^ ]* //' | grep -oE '^[a-z]+(\([^)]+\))?:' | sort -u

# File theme analysis
git diff --name-only main..HEAD | cut -d'/' -f1-2 | sort -u
CheckPass Criteria
Single commit typeAll commits share same prefix
Thematic filesAll changed files relate to PR scope
Atomic scopeCan explain in one sentence

Phase 5: Scope Check

# Infer scope from commit messages
SCOPE=$(git log --format="%s" main..HEAD | grep -oE '\([^)]+\)' | sort -u | head -1)

# All files should be within expected scope
git diff --name-only main..HEAD | grep -v "$SCOPE"

Report Generation

Pass Output

PR Validation: PASS

Branch: feature/suggest-validation (5 commits)
Upstream: main (in sync)

Checks:
  [OK] Isolation: Single type (refactor)
  [OK] Upstream: 0 commits behind
  [OK] Scope: 100% in internal/suggest/
  [OK] Quality: Tests pass

Ready for $pr-prep

Fail Output

PR Validation: BLOCKED

Checks:
  [FAIL] Isolation: Mixed types (refactor, fix, docs)
  [WARN] Upstream: 15 commits behind

Resolutions:
1. ISOLATION: Split branch by commit type
   git checkout main && git checkout -b refactor/suggest
   git cherry-pick <refactor-commits>

Run $pr-validate again after resolution.

Resolution Actions

Mixed Commit Types

# Cherry-pick to clean branch
git checkout main
git checkout -b ${BRANCH}-clean
git cherry-pick <relevant-commits-only>

Upstream Divergence

# Rebase on latest upstream
git fetch origin main
git rebase origin/main

Anti-Patterns

DON'TDO INSTEAD
Analyze stale branchCheck upstream FIRST
Skip validationRun before $pr-prep
Ignore scope creepExtract unrelated changes
Mix fix and refactorSeparate PRs by type

Examples

Validate PR Before Submission

User says: "Validate this PR branch for isolation and scope creep."

What happens:

  1. Check upstream alignment and branch freshness.
  2. Detect scope creep and unrelated file changes.
  3. Output remediation steps and pass/fail status.

Pre-Prep Gate

User says: "Run PR validation before I run $pr-prep."

What happens:

  1. Execute isolation and scope checks.
  2. Confirm quality gate readiness.
  3. Return a go/no-go recommendation.

Troubleshooting

ProblemCauseSolution
Validation reports stale branchUpstream advancedRebase/merge from upstream then rerun
Scope creep detectedExtra files or mixed objectivesSplit unrelated changes into follow-up PR
Alignment check failsBranch diverged from target expectationsReconcile base branch and acceptance criteria
Output unclearFindings not prioritizedSort findings by blocker vs non-blocker severity

What ships with it: 1 file

1.3 KB alongside SKILL.md, 1 of them executable

scripts/

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 326,852. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.