Profiling tables
Skill ulpi-io/plugin-marketplace/plugins/astronomer/skills/profiling-tables
Deep-dive data profiling for a specific table. Use when the user asks to profile a table, wants statistics about a dataset, asks about data quality, or needs to understand a table's structure and content. Requires a table name.From its SKILL.md
npx -y skills add ulpi-io/plugin-marketplace --skill profiling-tablesAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
2 things to look at
- no licenseNo license file was found in the repository. Code published without one is not open source by default, so using it at work is a question for whoever answers licensing questions where you are.
- 1 stars1 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
SKILL.md
3.8 KB, 893 tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it
Data Profile
Generate a comprehensive profile of a table that a new team member could use to understand the data.
Step 1: Basic Metadata
Query column metadata:
SELECT COLUMN_NAME, DATA_TYPE, COMMENT
FROM <database>.INFORMATION_SCHEMA.COLUMNS
WHERE TABLE_SCHEMA = '<schema>' AND TABLE_NAME = '<table>'
ORDER BY ORDINAL_POSITION
If the table name isn't fully qualified, search INFORMATION_SCHEMA.TABLES to locate it first.
Step 2: Size and Shape
Run via run_sql:
SELECT
COUNT(*) as total_rows,
COUNT(*) / 1000000.0 as millions_of_rows
FROM <table>
Step 3: Column-Level Statistics
For each column, gather appropriate statistics based on data type:
Numeric Columns
SELECT
MIN(column_name) as min_val,
MAX(column_name) as max_val,
AVG(column_name) as avg_val,
STDDEV(column_name) as std_dev,
PERCENTILE_CONT(0.5) WITHIN GROUP (ORDER BY column_name) as median,
SUM(CASE WHEN column_name IS NULL THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) as null_count,
COUNT(DISTINCT column_name) as distinct_count
FROM <table>
String Columns
SELECT
MIN(LEN(column_name)) as min_length,
MAX(LEN(column_name)) as max_length,
AVG(LEN(column_name)) as avg_length,
SUM(CASE WHEN column_name IS NULL OR column_name = '' THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) as empty_count,
COUNT(DISTINCT column_name) as distinct_count
FROM <table>
Date/Timestamp Columns
SELECT
MIN(column_name) as earliest,
MAX(column_name) as latest,
DATEDIFF('day', MIN(column_name), MAX(column_name)) as date_range_days,
SUM(CASE WHEN column_name IS NULL THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) as null_count
FROM <table>
Step 4: Cardinality Analysis
For columns that look like categorical/dimension keys:
SELECT
column_name,
COUNT(*) as frequency,
ROUND(COUNT(*) * 100.0 / SUM(COUNT(*)) OVER(), 2) as percentage
FROM <table>
GROUP BY column_name
ORDER BY frequency DESC
LIMIT 20
This reveals:
- High-cardinality columns (likely IDs or unique values)
- Low-cardinality columns (likely categories or status fields)
- Skewed distributions (one value dominates)
Step 5: Sample Data
Get representative rows:
SELECT *
FROM <table>
LIMIT 10
If the table is large and you want variety, sample from different time periods or categories.
Step 6: Data Quality Assessment
Summarize quality across dimensions:
Completeness
- Which columns have NULLs? What percentage?
- Are NULLs expected or problematic?
Uniqueness
- Does the apparent primary key have duplicates?
- Are there unexpected duplicate rows?
Freshness
- When was data last updated? (MAX of timestamp columns)
- Is the update frequency as expected?
Validity
- Are there values outside expected ranges?
- Are there invalid formats (dates, emails, etc.)?
- Are there orphaned foreign keys?
Consistency
- Do related columns make sense together?
- Are there logical contradictions?
Step 7: Output Summary
Provide a structured profile:
Overview
2-3 sentences describing what this table contains, who uses it, and how fresh it is.
Schema
| Column | Type | Nulls% | Distinct | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
Key Statistics
- Row count: X
- Date range: Y to Z
- Last updated: timestamp
Data Quality Score
- Completeness: X/10
- Uniqueness: X/10
- Freshness: X/10
- Overall: X/10
Potential Issues
List any data quality concerns discovered.
Recommended Queries
3-5 useful queries for common questions about this data.
What ships with it
Read from the repository
Just SKILL.md. No reference files, no scripts.
Gives 0 of the 12 instructions most profiling optimisation skills give in 893 tokens
Counted across 119 of the 180 authors here whose files we hold, read 2026-09-06
- Capture snapshots at baseline, target, and final statesin 10 of 119, across 4 files
- Determine whether the leak is browser-side or Node.js-sidein 10 of 119, across 4 files
- Repeat the interactions ten times to amplify the leakin 10 of 119, across 4 files
- Use memlab to identify leak traces from heapsnapshotsin 9 of 119, across 3 files
- Revert the page and check whether memory is releasedin 9 of 119, across 3 files
- Run the compare_snapshots fallback with Node.js when memlab is unavailablein 9 of 119, across 3 files
- Ask the user before nulling detached DOM nodesin 8 of 119, across 3 files
- Update profiles quarterlyin 6 of 119, across 3 files
- Obtain ISAC approval before external sharingin 6 of 119, across 3 files
- Qualify attribution confidence as low, medium, or highin 6 of 119, across 3 files
- Identify the leak's root cause in the codein 6 of 119, across 2 files
- Map group TTPs to ATT&CK using mitreattack-pythonin 6 of 119, across 3 files
Said here and by no other author read
- Query column metadata from INFORMATION_SCHEMA
- Locate unqualified table names before profiling
- Count total rows via run_sql
- Gather statistics matching each column's data type
- Analyse value frequency for categorical columns
- Fetch ten representative sample rows
Grouped from the skills themselves: near-identical wordings counted once, and counted by distinct author, so one author publishing three of these counts once. Length counted with cl100k_base; the agent that loads this file may tokenize it differently.